Do we agree trading up to #3 with Cardinals is the best option for the team?

[raleigh-panther]

3 minutes ago, CarolinaNCSU said:

It's risky as hell, but it's probably happening. At the same time, you just hired a staff that includes Reich, McCown, Caldwell, etc. 

If that room of coaches can't identify talent that they feel a conviction about, then we're more fuged than whatever the trade package ends up costing us. 

Exactly right 

[Raleigh PF]

Here's how I see it playing out...

Chicago trades back first with Houston and then with Indy.

The Panthers trade with Arizona.

So, the draft order becomes Houston, Indy, Carolina, Chicago. Each team gets what they want and Chicago walks away with a boatload of future picks.

[OceanPanther]

 

"Do we agree trading up to #3 with Cardinals is the best option for the team? "

 

Are you kidding me ??    Since when has there ever been a "WE ALL AGREE  "  on any message board.

 

AND NOOOOOOOOOO ..  I don't want to trade up.  Stay at 9 and draft responsibly .  LOOK AT ALL THE EARLY FIRST ROUND QB's  that just don't come close to making it.  I want a QB , but there are no generational QB's in this draft. Could any become Hall of Famers, YES, but too much draft capital would be spent guessing which one. 

[LinvilleGorge]

7 minutes ago, OceanPanther said:

 

there are no generational QB's in this draft

How do we know that? No one thought Mahomes was a generational talent.

I mean, Anthony Richardson is certainly a generational prospect in terms of raw talent but we'll see how that translates.

[Actionman0z]

12 hours ago, Cdparr7 said:

It’s being said that the price will be 

9th overall

2nd Round Pick

2024 1st

2025 1st

That’s a lot of capital for a guy who might pull a Zach Wilson. Then how you gonna draft and develop cause your shits gone. They will go sign more FA QBs and the huddle with bitch for another 10 years.

Cause they have like 85 million next year 

[cookinbrak]

2 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

At this point last year …. Malik Willis was projected to be a top 3 overall pick after the combine and his pro day.

And Kenny Pickett and Sam Howell and.....

[Eric4280]

9 minutes ago, Actionman0z said:

Cause they have like 85 million next year 

And we’re still 14th in the nfl in that department. These draft picks matter. Why are we predetermined to throw these picks away? We should all agree that sitting at 9 is optimal (look how the nfl treated Fields) and letting the board naturally fall.

[CamWhoaaCam]

After sleeping on it. I think trading for #1 may be the best option.

 

At the end of the day Stroud is a elite passer. He gets the ball to his WR's. I think the AR hype if great and all but there is still a gamble with him. Bryce is good but his size is a huge concern.

 

Im still sticking with Stroud as my top QB. If we want him we probably have to go all in for #1. After sleeping on it freak those picks! Go get our franchise QB with the #1 pick. It's time Carolina gets another game changing QB in this league.

 

 

[mrcompletely11]

Just now, CamWhoaaCam said:

After sleeping on it. I think trading for #1 may be the best option.

 

At the end of the day Stroud is a elite passer. He gets the ball to his WR's. I think the AR hype if great and all but there is still a gamble with him. Bryce is good but his size is a huge concern.

 

Im still sticking with Stroud as my top QB. If we want him we probably have to go all in for #1. After sleeping on it freak those picks! Go get our franchise QB with the #1 pick. It's time Carolina gets another game changing QB in this league.

 

 

3 firsts and a 2nd

or #9 and burns

 

I would pray to sweet baby Jesus that that take #9 and burns for 1.  thats a fair trade and solves 2 sets of problems for them as they will still get the best olineman in the draft and adds immediate already developed pass rushing

[mrcompletely11]

And its for this exact fuging reason was why we wanted to trade burns.  To use those picks to get our guy and not suck the capital from down the road, but here we are

[CamWhoaaCam]

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

3 firsts and a 2nd

or #9 and burns

 

I would pray to sweet baby Jesus that that take #9 and burns for 1.  thats a fair trade and solves 2 sets of problems for them as they will still get the best olineman in the draft and adds immediate already developed pass rushing

Honestly I rather keep Burns if we can. Pass rushers are the 2nd most important position in football. You need guys who can get after the QB.

 

I would bite the bullet and give up the extra 1st.

 

We at least know we have a stable core moving forward. Remove Burns and our defense just isn't what it was. We we have no pass rush.

[mrcompletely11]

7 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Honestly I rather keep Burns if we can. Pass rushers are the 2nd most important position in football. You need guys who can get after the QB.

 

I would bite the bullet and give up the extra 1st.

 

We at least know we have a stable core moving forward. Remove Burns and our defense just isn't what it was. We we have no pass rush.

it would be 2 more firsts and we wasted the bulk of his rookie deal simply by not having a qb

[TheSpecialJuan]

14 hours ago, Varking said:

I’d prefer to get to 1 so we can know who are guy is and get him. At 3 you wonder if we just settled while other teams got what we really wanted 

The price is gonna be brutal for #1 or #3 might as well go all the way to 1

[CPcavedweller]

Ym, no. We don't agree that trading up is right at all. I think you go where you need to in order to get Stroud or Richardson.