Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Charlie Campbell: Panthers love Bijan Robinson

thunderraiden

By thunderraiden,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Khyber53 Grand Master

Khyber53

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

Lol right?  Let's trade CMC and try it again!

If you could get CMC again at rookie wages...

That's why I said earlier this week that's why I'd take him with our pick, especially if we could trade back four or five spaces.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
37 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

If you could get CMC again at rookie wages...

That's why I said earlier this week that's why I'd take him with our pick, especially if we could trade back four or five spaces.

Trading back maybe.  Top 10 no way.  We just have more pressing needs that RB which can be replaced in the mid rounds...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raleigh PF Rising Star

Raleigh PF

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

He'd be BPA, and yet people would RIOT! 

Lmao

Yeah, the PC thing for GMs to do is talk about how they always want to select the BPA. 

Bullshit.

The best strategy is getting the best value for the pick. That means making selections that make the best economic sense AND fit the philosophy of the coaching staff. 

The most expensive positions in the NFL are QB, DL, WR and Edge, which is why we typically see those positions come off the board quickly. There are exceptions for unicorns like CMC but even that pick has been questioned.

Draft early to fill the most expensive positions unless you find a unicorn. Robinson is going to be a very good RB, but I don't think he's a unicorn.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthro Collaborator

Panthro

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Khyber53 said:

If you could get CMC again at rookie wages...

That's why I said earlier this week that's why I'd take him with our pick, especially if we could trade back four or five spaces.

Agreed
CMC was expensive, poo staff, and got injured all the time

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Khyber53 Grand Master

Khyber53

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

Trading back maybe.  Top 10 no way.  We just have more pressing needs that RB which can be replaced in the mid rounds...

But, if we have a veteran QB, with the offensive line intact (if injury recovery and resigning go well), then grabbing the best RB in the draft (and a very CMC similar skill set with a bit more mass) could be the biggest asset possible in getting our offense on tract.

I'm also looking that we grab him now, work him hard for the four years standard on the rookie contract and let him go out into the free agency world with a great resume, heavy stats and a higher price tag to someone else. He'd end up costing us less than $6 million a year, which after Foreman's performance may be less than he'd cost us to retain with a smaller skill set and more mileage. Foreman also wouldn't net us any compensatory picks when released later on while the first round RB would net us an additional 3rd.

I just think it makes a lot of sense on paper and on the field and in the salary cap department.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Raleigh PF said:

Yeah, the PC thing for GMs to do is talk about how they always want to select the BPA. 

Bullshit.

The best strategy is getting the best value for the pick. That means making selections that make the best economic sense AND fit the philosophy of the coaching staff. 

The most expensive positions in the NFL are QB, DL, WR and Edge, which is why we typically see those positions come off the board quickly. There are exceptions for unicorns like CMC but even that pick has been questioned.

Draft early to fill the most expensive positions unless you find a unicorn. Robinson is going to be a very good RB, but I don't think he's a unicorn.

I don't disagree, I'm just laughing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MasterAwesome Veteran

MasterAwesome

Posted
Posted (edited)

I don't know anything about this guy and generally speaking I agree that RB is a devalued position which I'd be wary of overdrafting.  But this kind of black-and-white thinking is what had a bunch of posters against drafting Micah Parsons because "I ain't drafting no damn LB in the first round!!" and we see how that turned out.  Rather than overly harping on the position itself, I think it's more useful to evaluate each prospect individually and the entirety of their skillset and what they bring to the table.

Edited by MasterAwesome
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
stan786 Mentor

stan786

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

I don't know anything about this guy and generally speaking I agree that RB is a devalued position which I'd be wary of overdrafting.  But this kind of black-and-white thinking is what had a bunch of posters against drafting Micah Parsons because "I ain't drafting no damn LB in the first round!!" and we see how that turned out.  Rather than overly harping on the position itself, I think it's more useful to evaluate each prospect individually and the entirety of their skillset and what they bring to the table.

I mean even the Cowboys realized the positional value and played Parsons at edge 90% of the time this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Prowler2k18
      We looked like a competent NFL team PIE thread

      By Prowler2k18 · Posted

      We could easily pick apart yesterday’s game: dropped passes, blown coverages, bad tackling and red zone issues to name a few. But it was clear that this wasn’t the same team from earlier in the season. They fought back and hung with the champs until the end. That’s what I was excited to see and it gives me hope that we’re on the right track.
    • Pejorative Miscreant
      Bryce developing before our eyes

      By Pejorative Miscreant · Posted

      I think BY played well today and exceeded expectations. I will temper future expectations as he has to string together many games of consistent quality. One game doesn’t convince me that he is a franchise QB or even a guy you want to stick with for another season. One game doesn’t erase all the negative play and limitations from the past couple of years. I hope he balls out and continues to get better but for me the verdict is still out   That said, I think he gave the team and fans hope yesterday which is a lot more than what we had when we woke up Sunday morning. 
    • Ricky Prickles
      Bryce Young - Good and Bad, what say you?

      By Ricky Prickles · Posted

      He was vastly improved today and we need to see more of Bryce the rest of the season to continue evaluate him in order to decide what the heck to do with him at the end of the season. He must play at least like this and improve more from here the rest of the season in order for me to keep him. No more 123 yard passing games and want to see at least this output weekly from him. If this is Bruce improving slowly over time then Canales is even better with developing QB's than I thought he was but still too early to tell and we need to see him the rest of the way as he has at very least earned back the starting gig moving forward.
×
×
  • Create New...