Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CORRAL


scratched
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, BEASTfromdaEAST said:

Just NO NO NO NO......Soooo many posters on here have been saying I like next yrs QBs better for the last 3 years... Just stop with these retreads and get draft a rookie QB high for fugs sake. So idiotic to allow Darnold to be a QB here, he sucks.....like really bad. I feel sometimes you guys don't even watch the games at all because if you did no one would be suggesting bringing Darnold back or giving Carr any kind of contract

You underestimate the stupidity of fans. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Skack25 said:

I keep hearing "retread, retread, retread."

Carson Wentz is a retread.

Derek Carr is not a retread.

How not? Had Adams, Waller, Renfrow with Jacobs serving his best year to date in backfield and Carr didn't do ish with that. Stidham made better plays than Carr as well when put in. What makes people think he would be good here with only having Moore or a 1st Rd WR as a weapon? Yeesh Carr IS a retread. Wentz don't have any tread  to even retread. 

We don't need a veteran QB or "bridge" QB to help rookie develop that's why Reich hired McCown and this coaching staff. Draft rookie and have him and Corrall compete in camp. End. Of. Thread.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Skack25 said:

I keep hearing "retread, retread, retread."

Carson Wentz is a retread.

Derek Carr is not a retread.

I'd be interested in the definition of "retread". Wentz gets benched for Hurts and gets traded for a 1st +, Carr gets benched for Stidham and gets cut. Where is the line on retread and non retread.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

I'm not against that plan.

If Carr can come down in his asking price to $30 million. You get a 4 time Pro Bowler with a guy like Corral to learn from? Corral has all of the physical tools that should not require us to spend the 9th pick on a QB. We don't have to give up picks to get Carr. 

If it's not Carr then just bring Darnold back. He'd finally get the coaching staff the 2nd overall pick in the draft deserved as opposed to Adam Gase and f'ing Matt Rhule. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...