Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stafford/Carr Comparison


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The big difference for me with Carr is that this is a guy who has actually played at a high level for the majority of his career. He isn't a guy who looked decent in spot duty for an all-time great offensive coach like Teddy. He isn't a guy who played terribly but showed elite physical tools like Darnold. He isn't a guy who had one decent season but then failed to build on that like Mayfield. Carr is definitely a different type of veteran QB than we've been dealing with in recent years.

Honestly, I'd still prefer draft but I wouldn't mind Carr.

Same. I wouldn't scream either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Same. I wouldn't scream either way.

Especially since we're not involved early. Would I want to get in a bidding war for Carr with the bidding starting at $35M per year? No. But if we wait a bit and he comes to talk to us and the number comes down to more like $25M per year over day three years? Hmmm... that becomes a very different scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's lazy in terms of their really being nothing to discuss then. If we're just trusting the staff then what's to discuss?

Oh, there's still plenty to discuss.

That's my honest opinion though.

And frankly,  after fifteen years of Hurney and three years of Rhule, I'm extremely happy to even be able to say that.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

Hey guy. We're still on the same topic. I provided you information that you refuse to address because you know it destroys your narrative. Multiple things can be true. Carr is a retread. He's an upgrade over Darnold. Even Teddy Bridgewater is an upgrade over that. The issue is where folks like yourself are now chasing after and propping up anyone that fits that criteria. If he took an affordable deal that would be one thing. But 35 million a year? Big no thanks.

BTW cheers to the most triggered Carr superfan on the huddle 😂🍻

Screenshot_20230225_144009_Firefox.thumb.jpg.bc5b3b41af9293c76eea8d459cf678d0.jpg

Lol dude I think you combine people in your head or something. I’m not on Carr’s nuts. 
 

I simply said what I said about the overuse of “retread”, lumping every QB in the same category, you responded, I asked you to clarify your definition of retread, and you didn’t respond to that but argued something I wasn’t taking about. 
 

Stay organized. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, frankw said:

Hey guy. We're still on the same topic. I provided you information that you refuse to address because you know it destroys your narrative. Multiple things can be true. Carr is a retread. He's an upgrade over Darnold. Even Teddy Bridgewater is an upgrade over that. The issue is where folks like yourself are now chasing after and propping up anyone that fits that criteria. If he took an affordable deal that would be one thing. But 35 million a year? Big no thanks.

BTW cheers to the most triggered Carr superfan on the huddle 😂🍻

Screenshot_20230225_144009_Firefox.thumb.jpg.bc5b3b41af9293c76eea8d459cf678d0.jpg

That dude is crazy!

 

He literally did the same thing to me. He's pooing everybody who says something negative about Carr lol

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The big difference for me with Carr is that this is a guy who has actually played at a high level for the majority of his career. He isn't a guy who looked decent in spot duty for an all-time great offensive coach like Teddy. He isn't a guy who played terribly but showed elite physical tools like Darnold. He isn't a guy who had one decent season but then failed to build on that like Mayfield. Carr is definitely a different type of veteran QB than we've been dealing with in recent years.

Honestly, I'd still prefer draft but I wouldn't mind Carr.

He's played at a high level with 1 playoff appearance in his entire 9 year career.

 

We all get he's a middle of the pack QB which isn't bad, but we don't need a 32 year old QB with this roster. Carr needs a lot of help around him to make a run. If we sign Carr we are just a playoff team and 1st round exit every year.

 

If we had the 49ers type of roster I would be all for signing Carr. I know people trying to paint me as a Carr hater that's not true. I said from the start he isn't the QB we need with this current roster. We just don't have enough talent around him to make a run for a SB right now.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been saying that hes a good player.  Like I said, I've done a little research and the one thing I've noticed where the dividing line between good/manager QB's and franchise is the 2:1 TD to INT line.  The further someone breaks over the 2:1 the closer a QB comes to being a HOF level QB (aside from Eli in modern NFL, its something I generally see).  Carr is not a HOF QB, he IS however a franchise QB.  He's along the lines of Dak Prescott or Kirk Cousins.  These are QBs that YOU CAN win with, and generally speaking will win more than they lose (good ole Raiders managed to fug that up).  Carr is a solid/good direction we could go if we dont like the options or what it would take to get an elite qb in the draft, it would allow for us to potentially win quickly.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

He's played at a high level with 1 playoff appearance in his entire 9 year career.

We all get he's a middle of the pack QB which isn't bad, but we don't need a 32 year old QB with this roster. Carr needs a lot of help around him to make a run. If we sign Carr we are just a playoff team and 1st round exit every year.

If we had the 49ers type of roster I would be all for signing Carr. I know people trying to paint me as a Carr hater that's not true. I said from the start he isn't the QB we need with this current roster. We just don't have enough talent around him to make a run for a SB right now.

A fan of Lamar Jackson probably shouldn't be using the playoffs as a criteria for judging quarterbacks 😆

Also, teams win, teams lose. Acting like QBs can be judged by a win-loss record is a clear sign you don't have a clue what you're talking about.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

A fan of Lamar Jackson probably shouldn't be using the playoffs as a criteria for judging quarterbacks 😆

Also, teams win, teams lose. Acting like QBs can be judged by a win-loss record is a clear sign you don't have a clue what you're talking about.

You bring up Lamar Jackson in every other post I make.

 

I can say the sky is blue and you will still find a way to mention Lamar Jackson.smh

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Carolina Cajun said:

I've been saying that hes a good player.  Like I said, I've done a little research and the one thing I've noticed where the dividing line between good/manager QB's and franchise is the 2:1 TD to INT line.  The further someone breaks over the 2:1 the closer a QB comes to being a HOF level QB (aside from Eli in modern NFL, its something I generally see).  Carr is not a HOF QB, he IS however a franchise QB.  He's along the lines of Dak Prescott or Kirk Cousins.  These are QBs that YOU CAN win with, and generally speaking will win more than they lose (good ole Raiders managed to fug that up).  Carr is a solid/good direction we could go if we dont like the options or what it would take to get an elite qb in the draft, it would allow for us to potentially win quickly.

We saw what a Kirk Cousins type of QB ultimately amounts to in the playoffs when they lost to the Giants. The man threw a pass behind the line of scrimmage. No way we need to hitch our wagon to a quarterback whose ceiling is that for 100+ million. Draft and develop our own for a change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

That dude is crazy!

 

He literally did the same thing to me. He's pooing everybody who says something negative about Carr lol

To give you an idea of what you are dealing with. He was once the most outspoken Matt Rhule defender here. Crazy is an understatement.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • One has a proven, offensive-minded, Super Bowl winning head coach along with a top 5 OL + defense. He's being protected and getting the ball back not having to chase the other teams. The other had Frank Reich + Thomas Brown their rookie year with a bottom 5 defense as well as a bottom 5 OL that gave up the 2nd most sacks against a rookie QB ever. The sophomore season is being ran with a top 5 OL but also with a rookie HC (that has just one year of OC experience) and a bottom 5 defense still. The Broncos defense has allowed over 20pts just three times this season (26 vs. SEA (L), 23 vs. LAC (L), 41 vs. BAL (L)). Meanwhile, the Panthers have had ONE game where the defense gave up less than 20pts (vs. NYG (W)).   I'm not sure how folks couldn't expect Bo Nix to statistically perform better given their incredibly different situations. With that said, I didn't expect Nix to keep ascending as impressively as he has this season. Hopefully his arc will give other older college QBs a better shot, especially given the recent media blitz against the NFL regarding how development of the QB position in the league seems to be non-existent. Hopefully Bryce continues to improve as well, of course.  
    • “You can learn a lot in 10 games,” Nix said. “[I’m] still learning, still growing, but just finding ways to execute the play that’s called, no matter what it is: run play, pass play. It doesn’t matter. Just finding the right way to go with the ball.” To that point, Nix noted how his developing partnership with head coach Sean Payton has helped Denver’s offense get to the next level. “To be honest, I think at the beginning, you kind of make the NFL bigger than what it actually is,” Nix said when asked where he feels he’s made the most strides. “These players are really good, but at the same time, you have really good players on your level. I think simplifying the game, trying to play as fast as possible, and finding a completion, which is what we’ve been able to do here recently. “I think as we’ve gone on, Coach and I have found a good rhythm of what we both like, what we can kind of put out there on the field, and what we can execute. Then the guys have kind of adapted to it, found our roles within the offense, and executed at a high level. It’s just all about slowing the game down and processing things in a manner that you can handle. Just kind of see one or two things, and let those guys take you to where the ball is supposed to be.” -Bo Nix From what I'm gathering regarding Bryce, the Panthers entered this season with a reset mindset. It's Young's rookie year, which explains the benching. Now, we're beginning to see the development of Canales and Young's offense. Slow development but we're winning 😃 
    • Bix has more tds through his first 11 games than bryce has his entire career....no comparison at all he made amazing throws during his first games his decision making just keeps getting better.  Young does not have the physical ability ro make the rhrows bo makes
×
×
  • Create New...