Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Todd McShay seems to really like Anthony Richardson


Dorian Gray
 Share

Recommended Posts

I will say this about him. I have seen some people try to compare his rawness to Willis. That's not right because AR is much further along, and of course he played in a big boy conference. That being said, he put up some stinkers due to the level of competition which is concerning. He couldn't sit back like Willis and look like a men among boys, running it and chucking it all over the field at will.

The question for Willis is whether or not he'll be able to read pro defenses and make the proper reads. This is the same question for Corral, but Corral didn't have accuracy issues. Where Richardson should have it over Corral is running ability and durability. He's bigger and presumably stronger, but the mental aspect of the game is just as important, and it's not like Corral doesn't have good mobility himself. 

It will be interesting for sure if we're the ones that actually draft Richardson.

Edited by top dawg
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I will say this about him. I have seen some people try to compare his rawness to Willis. That's not right because AR is much further along, and of course he played in a big boy conference. That being said, he put up some stinkers due to the level of competition which is concerning. He couldn't sit back like Willis and look like a men among boys, running it and chucking it all over the field at will.

The question for Willis is whether or not he'll be able to read pro defenses and make the proper reads. This is the same question for Corral, but Corral didn't have accuracy issues. Where Richardson should have it over Corral is running ability and durability. He's bigger and presumably stronger, but the mental aspect of the game is just as important, and it's not like Corral doesn't have good mobility himself. 

It will be interesting for sure if we're the ones that actually draft Richardson.

Corral has accuracy issues on his deep balls - he literally changes his throwing motion to throw the ball deep. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Varking said:

 

 

I think if you get the green light on him from your psychologists / coaches - whoever analyses his drive / coachability then you could convince yourself to take him over Young and Stroud. 

Takes a brave GM to do that though considering their relative production in College. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I will say this about him. I have seen some people try to compare his rawness to Willis. That's not right because AR is much further along, and of course he played in a big boy conference. That being said, he put up some stinkers due to the level of competition which is concerning. He couldn't sit back like Willis and look like a men among boys, running it and chucking it all over the field at will.

The question for Willis is whether or not he'll be able to read pro defenses and make the proper reads. This is the same question for Corral, but Corral didn't have accuracy issues. Where Richardson should have it over Corral is running ability and durability. He's bigger and presumably stronger, but the mental aspect of the game is just as important, and it's not like Corral doesn't have good mobility himself. 

It will be interesting for sure if we're the ones that actually draft Richardson.

I'm super intrigued by Richardson but he's definitely boom or bust. No doubt about that.

I'll be excited as hell if we draft him because that means that our very qualified and experienced coaching staff (whew, that's a relief) believes in him and their ability to develop him. I won't throw a fit if we don't draft him because then the opposite would be true and I do trust this staff to make this call more so than any staff we've ever had.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm super intrigued by Richardson but he's definitely boom or bust. No doubt about that.

I'll be excited as hell if we draft him because that means that our very qualified and experienced coaching staff (whew, that's a relief) believes in him and their ability to develop him. I won't throw a fit if we don't draft him because then the opposite would be true and I do trust this staff to make this call more so than any staff we've ever had.

I'll honor the honeymoon for a period, whether a year or two, but all this needs to lead to something. I would give them three depending upon progress, but the Rhule experience and age has made me just a little more impatient.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I'll honor the honeymoon for a period, whether a year or two, but all this needs to lead to something. I would give them three depending upon progress, but the Rhule experience and age has made me just a little more impatient.

Oh, for sure. Competence and experience doesn't automatically guarantee success. You can still swing and whiff. Bill Belichick has had no shortage of bad draft picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Some incredible plays in that video, starting to think he isnt going to drop to 9

Trading up to 3 makes a lot of sense. Hopefully the Colts jump to 1 and take “that Alabama guy” the Texans fall in love with Levis and we get Stroud at 3. AR would be the backup option…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Just think about the level of stud you gotta be to wear #15 at UF.

Speaking of which... how in the fug is #15 at UF not retired??? We all mock The Golden Calf of Bristol in the NFL but nobody should be wearing that jersey at Florida.

Nobody should be able to wear 15 at Florida. I agree. As a college player there were few with better resumes. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Some incredible plays in that video, starting to think he isnt going to drop to 9

I’m a fan of AR15 thanks to @LinvilleGorgeback in October.. however, as JT O’Sullivan showed in QB school - AR’s great are great and his bads are really bad. 
 

however, that’s the polarity you get with a player like AR. High risk, high reward.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

Trading up to 3 makes a lot of sense. Hopefully the Colts jump to 1 and take “that Alabama guy” the Texans fall in love with Levis and we get Stroud at 3. AR would be the backup option…

Yes. His body of work is small but what is there, and what is good is outerworldly

My feeling is that what he has cannot be taught

what he needs to improve on can be taught and the Panthers have teachers 

others disagree and that’s ok but for me it’s Stroud because he is an already baked cake or it’s AR who could become something very special in a world of Carrs and Tannehills

people who think this guy is going to get out of the top 10 are kidding themselves 

Edited by raleigh-panther
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...