Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

10 reasons


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Luciu5 said:

Carr is fine. Top half of the league guy currently. We will win games with Carr. That will be fun to watch winning football. He'll never get us to the super bowl. We will pick 18-28 next year and Carr has to prove he can do it or the younger guys we are mentoring and grooming will take over and get us to the promised land. Then he becomes an expensive backup who can start and maybe do a Nick Foles impression in the even of injury to our starter.

FIFY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Luciu5 said:

Carr is fine. Top half of the league guy currently. We will win games with Carr. That will be fun to watch winning football. He'll never get us to the super bowl. We will pick 18-28 every year. We won't have any hope of a franchise QB until after he moves on or retires. Panthers will continue to be a media afterthought.

Ya gotta get to the dance...that's all that matters.  I'm ready for a QB that consistently get to the playoffs, period, end of story.  Carr does that.

One player does not a Super Bowl team make, even the very best of the very best only get a shot or two at the Owl...we need to take more shots.

If you want to go trade for Mahommes, Herbert, Allen or Burrow...I'm all in.  Trade it all.

Moving up in the draft to take Stroud, sitting at 9 and grabbing AR....doesn't guarantee you anything other than a 1st round QB on your roster.  Which is great...but that doesn't mean he's good, or will consistently get you to the playoffs....or beyond...but adding Carr does.

We need to win, and soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, thefuzz said:

Ya gotta get to the dance...that's all that matters.  I'm ready for a QB that consistently get to the playoffs, period, end of story.  Carr does that.

One player does not a Super Bowl team make, even the very best of the very best only get a shot or two at the Owl...we need to take more shots.

If you want to go trade for Mahommes, Herbert, Allen or Burrow...I'm all in.  Trade it all.

Moving up in the draft to take Stroud, sitting at 9 and grabbing AR....doesn't guarantee you anything other than a 1st round QB on your roster.  Which is great...but that doesn't mean he's good, or will consistently get you to the playoffs....or beyond...but adding Carr does.

We need to win, and soon.

Carr seems to have regressed badly. Even his buddy Devanta Adams didn’t shed tears when he was benched and released 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/22/2023 at 11:58 AM, JawnyBlaze said:

I mean, he was a legit leading candidate for MVP that year and if the Eagles had not traded up and got him they wouldn’t have won their first ever Super Bowl. So I think they’d say it was worth it. 

I was going to say - isn't the aim of the game to win the SuperBowl?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OldhamA said:

I was going to say - isn't the aim of the game to win the SuperBowl?

1st goal.  Win the division.

2nd goal.  Host a home playoff game.

3rd goal.  Win game.

4th goal.  Host second home playoff game.

5th goal.  Go to Super Bowl.

6th goal.  Win the Lombardi.

 

You have to get to goal 1 to have a decent shot at goal 3, 4 or 5.  The idea is to keep getting chances to catch fire and get healthy at the same time.  I'm All In on winning an Owl, but I'm more interested in consistency and controlling our division so we can get more shots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

1st goal.  Win the division.

2nd goal.  Host a home playoff game.

3rd goal.  Win game.

4th goal.  Host second home playoff game.

5th goal.  Go to Super Bowl.

6th goal.  Win the Lombardi.

 

You have to get to goal 1 to have a decent shot at goal 3, 4 or 5.  The idea is to keep getting chances to catch fire and get healthy at the same time.  I'm All In on winning an Owl, but I'm more interested in consistency and controlling our division so we can get more shots.

Are we getting into the old "just win one Super Bowl and I'm good for the next 20 years" debate again?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Are we getting into the old "just win one Super Bowl and I'm good for the next 20 years" debate again?

The nice thing about that is it is non binding. Just win one and then if we win another I’ll be good for the next twenty all over again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Are we getting into the old "just win one Super Bowl and I'm good for the next 20 years" debate again?

Seems like it.

Personally, I'd just prefer to try to be the Packers, Steelers, Ravens, etc....learn how to win consistently and take your shots when you get close.

Just frustrating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

There's a few more than that, but they're not all starters.

Brady retiring (again) took all of his off the table.

This so dumb. You’re telling me the Bengals, Charger and Bills haven’t found their QB since they haven’t won the SB yet?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do
    • No one had posted in a month.  I don't think any of us were watching
    • Here is how this draft could get mind-blowingly complicated--Interesting comment about Jags floating the Jeanty idea to lure Chicago into a trade.  I have to think Ben Johnson is going to duplicate in many ways the success he had in Detroit, and I have to think their free agency was following the blueprint Carolina designed last year (one that the Saints designed before them with Brees) and they upgraded all of their interior linemen.  RT in Chicago is set; Johnson loves RT Darnell Wright.  However, at LT, Braxton Jones is coming off a December injury and is considered to be in a competition for the position this year by at least a few fans on the Bears Wire.  His PFF score, however, was solid, posting an 80+ score in pass protection and 70+ score in run blocking.  He is in his prime.  However, in some of their fan mocks, the Bears are taking a LT.  I thought they needed an Edge to play 4-3 strong side across from Sweat, but they signed Odeyingbo to a pretty big contract in March. For the Bears, in my view, it comes down to TE or Running Back. Kmet is their #1 TE and he had 474 yards in that role, which was 25th in the NFL last season for TEs.  Adding Warren would help upgrade the TE spot and give them the ability to add around an estimated 80 yards of production per game.  The Bears have D'Andre Swift at RB, but could use a RB to pair with him for a desired 2 RB attack.  So if I am Da Bears, I stay at 10 and take Warren.  If the Jags want to move on from Etienne, then they will take Jeanty. I think, if I were the Jags (with 10 picks this year) I would take Mason Graham and not try to get an 11th pick.  It is a need position, and it seems to me the only reason they are toying with the idea of moving on from Etienne is because Jeanty is on the board.  That, to me, would be a luxury pick. New GM, I think he does not get cute--they take Graham if they stay at 5.  I might say the Jags' biggest need is Corner.  #5 is too rich for Will Johnson, but remember, they have 10 picks.  could they move up with Cleveland and take Hunter, giving them a CB and WR threat?  To me, with the draft capital they have, that is the move they should make.  Cleveland then could move back to #5.  Remember, Nick Chubb is an aging (29) free agent coming off an injury--so he is gone.  With an additional second rounder, the Browns move back and take Jeanty to give Flacco a running game. The Jags pick is very interesting, but I would not be surprised to see them move up. 
×
×
  • Create New...