Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching Staff: Final Pieces (as of 2-23-23)

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Aussie Tank Grand Master

Aussie Tank

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, rayzor said:

so do we know who they are talking to re: Tight tends coaching job?

i was just trying to get an idea of who thy might be chasing after. i started trying to do some digging, but after about 10 minutes of googling i gave up. 

i see us going three routes based on what we've done so far...either guys who have been head coaches or that are on track to be a head coach or who are position coaches and assistant head coaches...or long term players who are getting into coaching. 

so who is...

1) a former head coach who also either was a TE or coached TEs?

2) a rising star coach who may have played TE?

3) a former stud TE who is wanting to break into coaching?

 

Ditka haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PanthersATL Grand Master

PanthersATL

Posted
Posted

So now the next question is…. Does a stacked coaching staff entice players to want to come to Carolina and be a part of this show?   I mean, it cant hurt, but really how big is the player benefit when looking from the outside?
 

and I’m sure the current roster are watching this and saying WTF in a good way.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tukafan21 Grand Master

tukafan21

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, PanthersATL said:

So now the next question is…. Does a stacked coaching staff entice players to want to come to Carolina and be a part of this show?   I mean, it cant hurt, but really how big is the player benefit when looking from the outside?
 

and I’m sure the current roster are watching this and saying WTF in a good way.

In year 1, I'd have to think it really only would help with guys who played for these coaches in the past and have high opinions of playing for them.

But if we have a good year and the staff is praised as a reason why, then I could see it helping us next off season, particularly with those guys who take the 1 year deals for lesser money to try and show out and get a bigger contract the next year, such as Reddick.  

But in reality, not sure too many players are signing with anyone because of specific position coaches, mostly just HC's and the occasional OC/DC depending on the player and coaches situation.  What this will help out immensely with though, is the development of our young guys.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
EgoDogg Proficient

EgoDogg

Posted
Posted (edited)
23 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Oh so now you all love Tepper now? you guys disgust me damn hypocrites 

You should save those messages for the people who actually bitched and complained about Tepper, instead of assuming that it was everyone. At least check a poster's history first before making comments like that. 🙄

Edited by EgoDogg
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

I dont think it can properly be expressed, but I don't EVER recall an all-star, highly touted staff being assembled of THIS magnitude.  Like this is insane.

I do, but it wasn't the Panthers.

When he was hired by the Rams, Dick Vermeil hired a staff that included some ex-head coaches as well as young up-and-comers. I remember raising an eyebrow when I saw it.

They did pretty well for themselves.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, PanthersATL said:

So now the next question is…. Does a stacked coaching staff entice players to want to come to Carolina and be a part of this show?   I mean, it cant hurt, but really how big is the player benefit when looking from the outside?
 

and I’m sure the current roster are watching this and saying WTF in a good way.

 

10 hours ago, tukafan21 said:

In year 1, I'd have to think it really only would help with guys who played for these coaches in the past and have high opinions of playing for them.

But if we have a good year and the staff is praised as a reason why, then I could see it helping us next off season, particularly with those guys who take the 1 year deals for lesser money to try and show out and get a bigger contract the next year, such as Reddick.  

But in reality, not sure too many players are signing with anyone because of specific position coaches, mostly just HC's and the occasional OC/DC depending on the player and coaches situation.  What this will help out immensely with though, is the development of our young guys.

i could see this as something that will be a really good draw for free agents looking to play for a future payday. Someone who has been an underperformer who feels they just haven't been getting good coaching might want to come here. 

For guys who were previously coached by one of our new coaches, though, i think if they were as good as we have been told then we'll see players telling their agents to find some way to Carolina. that's what i'm hoping anyways.

 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • dxrfxd
      How do I resolve a problem with 𝓥𝗲𝗻𝗺𝗼? [[Issue Handled]]

      By dxrfxd · Posted

      https://support.google.com/nonprofits/thread/337663596?hl=en&sjid=4609552219380362084-NC https://support.google.com/nonprofits/thread/337663596?hl=en&sjid=4609552219380362084-NC https://support.google.com/nonprofits/thread/337663596?hl=en&sjid=4609552219380362084-NC https://support.google.com/nonprofits/thread/337663596?hl=en&sjid=4609552219380362084-NC
    • MHS831
      Panthers Prospect Visits/Meetings

      By MHS831 · Posted

      What this chart tells me with absolute certainty: In the first round, we like Georgia's #11 or #13 at 8.  However, TMac as the lone offensive player could suggest that he is the pick if on the board--if they liked him. the reason I think this?  There are edges predicted to go in all other rounds that were met with.  The others seem to be preparing for a trade back.  I think Morgan wants to do that.  We are definitely prioritizing edge over anything else in rounds 1 and 2. The overwhelming number of Edges/OLBs in rounds 1-3 might suggest that they are looking for two edges--or they are going to go after a WR and or S in round 1.  For example, if Walker is gone, they might want to take TMac.  With only 1 WR and 1 S mentioned in round 1, it makes you wonder if they are not being targeted.  At WR, Noel is listed in round 2 and Sanker is the only other S listed, in round 4.  Jon Snow's prediction that Emmanwori could be the pick in round 1 is supported by this theory. In a draft so overloaded at DT, the Panthers brought in Nolen (probably wondering if he drops to the second and if the rumors about his character are valid), TJ Sanders from the USC in the second, and Deione Walker, a NT from KY (I heard they liked him at SR Bowl) in the third.  In other words, not a lot of DT attention in the first 3 rounds. However, of the 11 players listed as prospects in rounds 2 and 3, five (5) are edge players.  We are taking an edge in rounds 1 or 2.  I think, since only 1 WR and no safeties are listed after round 1, they will be flexible in round 1.  They cannot be flexible with S based on this list, unless Sanker in round 4 is more than a fallback. Here is the dilemma--if they take an edge in round 1--based on this list only--does that force them to take Noel in round 2 and Sanker in round 4?  Big dropoffs if you consider that Princely and Swinson and Kinnard will be there in rounds 2 and 3? The lack of focus on WR is alarming. Of course, teams could use visits to analyze character because red flags are flying.  Nolen, TMac, have questions. DL seems to pick up steam at pick 140.  In fact, South Carolina has 4 DL on this list (most are local visits).    What do I get from this? Taking a S in round 1 makes sense and the rest of the draft seems to fall together.  Trade back is ideal. In round 1, we seem to be focused on Jalon Walker (LB) and Emmanwori (S).  TMac is a real possibility, allowing them to focus on D from here out. Round 2 will be an edge-maybe even if we take Walker.   However, if we do take Walker, Round 2 could be Noel (WR). Round 3  I think, based on this, the Panthers will take Knight (LB USC).  I think Morgan will love him.  Walker (NT, KY) is also on the table. Round 4  If they missed Emmanwori in the first round, Sanker is taken here.  I would also expect them to draft Trapoli (OT) a RT with excellent pass blocking skills.  Round 5  The Panthers seem to like the depth of this draft at DL enough to focus on DT depth with picks 140 and 146.  DTs Cam Jackson and Pegues are listed.  Both would be steals here.    
    • ddffgfc
      How do I resolve a problem with 𝓥𝗲𝗻𝗺𝗼? [[Issue Handled by rayzor]]

      By ddffgfc · Posted

      what you don't do is talk about it in an NFL team forum. stop this stupidity.
×
×
  • Create New...