Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We have our coaches. What schemes will we run?


Cam's New Arm
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Jon Snow said:

Well, if you want to develop minority coaches on the offensive side of the ball to become head coaches you've got to start somewhere.  The Panthers are doing just that. If someone is complaining about that then they are complaining just to complain. 

Also Reich’s age concerns me much less knowing he can attract these type of young coordinators. When he decides to retire I feel like we will have a solid guy in the wings waiting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Also Reich’s age concerns me much less knowing he can attract these type of young coordinators. When he decides to retire I feel like we will have a solid guy in the wings waiting.

We also have a safety net if he were to get fired or resign. There is lots of potential head coaches already on staff to promote. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DEFENSE

A variation of a two-high shell is very likely, whether be more of a hybrid 4-3 or a base 3-4.  

OFFENSE

Looking at the philosophies and where Brown, Staley and Reich bring...physical & agile RBs, more than 1 home run hitting WR, and a good TE.  With Staley, Brown & Reich, there will be elements of what Jamaal Williams & the late season surge of Akers did on the ground.  Physical but not a slow burn.  Some spread and RPO concepts but not too much. Just thinking about this makes me giddy at the prospect of a Stroud in this offense.  

 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33% blitz rate last year, Fangio probably averaged 25%. 

Sure enough, Evero took Fangio’s defensive scheme and revamped it into a more aggressive model. Where Fangio would send three or four in pass-rushing situations, Evero sent four, sometimes five or six rushers if it meant giving Denver’s defense a chance to get off the field. In 2021, Denver’s defense forced a total of 19 turnovers — in 2022 they forced 23. After intercepting 13 passes in 2021, the Broncos snagged 15 this season.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

I think so too. He compliments Luvu fairly well. If he relies on playing in the box all the time, he might as well convert. Still can use him in hybrid capacities 

I could see a linebacker group of Chinn and Thompson on the inside, Burns and Luvu on the edges.

That's assuming Thompson stays of course, which is by no means a given.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First-time defensive coordinator Ejiro Evero features a personality more consistent than a metronome, but his schemes are creative and aggressive.

Last week against the Colts, he employed three outside linebackers, some call it the NASCAR package, with rookie Nik Bonitto and Bradley Chubb outside and Baron Browning roaming from the middle. The Broncos sacked Matt Ryan six times and Caden Sterns delivered two interceptions. The idea of this defense featuring fangs began crystallizing in the spring, Chubb told Denver7 in a one-on-one interview this week.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if Rapp is going to be too expensive for us as a FA. He is ideally who we need to bring in beside Woods and allow Chinn to slide down closer to the LOS. 

Bozeman and either Foreman/Jamaal Williams need to be our top priorities, but after that Rapp would be a huge get to solidify our backend.

I think we can add a TE and DL in R2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I could see a linebacker group of Chinn and Thompson on the inside, Burns and Luvu on the edges.

That's assuming Thompson stays of course, which is by no means a given.

Luvu is the one I wonder about if better inside or out.  Think he can honestly play both, versatile guy.  

Big fan of this EDGE draft class so maybe we can add a scheme versatile guy (or two)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not so secret- All super super smart OCs run the same O. It is called " this works". If a new look D is giving everyone fits and Mcvay breaks it piceces with a 14 play designs........next week alllll the coaches will have 4 of into the playbook, the next week 9 plays added, ""

D- looks like 3-4, have to wait until what type of players are signed and drafted. But the staff looks pure 3-4. So long the points are low and TO high, idgaf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...