Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mock draft from April of last year


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Luciu5 said:

If we had beaten Tampa this year, we'd be at 19 this year. You are saying if it wasn't for that one loss, we should be sticking with Sam Darnold?

Kinda different considering Darnold being a FA and a half ass coaching staff. But had Darnold not shitt the bed against Tampa and took us to the playoffs there would be a different perception about him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, stan786 said:

I'm curious who you have so high next year other than Maye and Williams. Penix, Daniels, Leary, Travis, Nix, and Ewers all have some pretty big question marks. Levis this time last year was more intriguing than all of them tbh. If Penix and Nix came out this year its pretty unlikely they would have been in the top 4 guys. I would have had Penix over Mckee and Hooker for sure though.

It usually who catches fire and there are several that could.  The problem with Levis is he took a step backwards.   Injuries happen, but he lost some weapons this past season.

Williams and Maye are the obvious ones, but Pennix, Ward, McCall, Leary, Reed, Ewers, Daniels, Nix, Travis, Van Dyke, Jefferson, Hartman, Ulagalelei, Armstrong, Jurkovec, Rogers, Gabriel, Rising, Mordicai, Rattler and so on and so on and so on. That's not even considering the first year starters taking over guys getting drafted this year, that could come out after one season.  It's deep and talented.  I'd take nearly any of those guys NOW over Mckee in this draft and he's generally considered QB5/6.  This draft was always light at the top, but several guys went back to school and gutted the middle rounds prospects.  Most of those guys are out of eligibility after this season; they have to come out.

If any of the transfers light it up with their new schools, their draft stock will skyrocket.  It's hard to say now how may 1st rounders will be projected, but I would venture it could be as high as 6 or 7. 

Patience grasshopper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

It usually who catches fire and there are several that could.  The problem with Levis is he took a step backwards.   Injuries happen, but he lost some weapons this past season.

Williams and Maye are the obvious ones, but Pennix, Ward, McCall, Leary, Reed, Ewers, Daniels, Nix, Travis, Van Dyke, Jefferson, Hartman, Ulagalelei, Armstrong, Jurkovec, Rogers, Gabriel, Rising, Mordicai, Rattler and so on and so on and so on. That's not even considering the first year starters taking over guys getting drafted this year, that could come out after one season.  It's deep and talented.  I'd take nearly any of those guys NOW over Mckee in this draft and he's generally considered QB5/6.  This draft was always light at the top, but several guys went back to school and gutted the middle rounds prospects.  Most of those guys are out of eligibility after this season; they have to come out.

If any of the transfers light it up with their new schools, their draft stock will skyrocket.  It's hard to say now how may 1st rounders will be projected, but I would venture it could be as high as 6 or 7. 

Patience grasshopper.

Yeah I understand there’s always people who pop up, I think you are discounting how often QBs take a step back as well. The class has two great QBs at the moment and a bunch of maybes.

I think you can see a guy or two break that into the first but it just seems way overly optimistic to assume there’s going to be that many first rounders based on what we know now. 

Don’t get me wrong a few guys are intriguing but other than the top two making plans around any of them is a massive risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, stan786 said:

Yeah I understand there’s always people who pop up, I think you are discounting how often QBs take a step back as well. The class has two great QBs at the moment and a bunch of maybes.

I think you can see a guy or two break that into the first but it just seems way overly optimistic to assume there’s going to be that many first rounders based on what we know now. 

Don’t get me wrong a few guys are intriguing but other than the top two making plans around any of them is a massive risk.

Outside of a generational QB, they are ALL risks.  If you follow the draft, usually it's the other way around--expectations are low for fringe QBs early on, one or two guys are hyped and then two, three or four more end up going in the first round (last year's crap class being an exception).

There is no generational QB this draft, thus each of them have several questions. Beyond Stroud and Young, Levis and Richardson are more bust than boom prospects.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Outside of a generational QB, they are ALL risks.  If you follow the draft, usually it's the other way around--expectations are low for fringe QBs early on, one or two guys are hyped and then two, three or four more end up going in the first round (last year's crap class being an exception).

There is no generational QB this draft, thus each of them have several questions. Beyond Stroud and Young, Levis and Richardson are more bust than boom prospects.

 

Yes I follow the draft and I agree all QBs are risks. This class is probably very similar to next years class and most general classes. There have been 2 generational prospects in the past decade or so Luck and Lawrence. Caleb isnt generational yet and Maye has a lot to prove. End of the day Levis and Richardson probably slot in at the front end of that second QB group next year pretty easily at this point. Constantly waiting for a Generational Prospect isnt something that happens generally you are going to have to pick someone with risks.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...