Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Moore is the future...


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

ten bucks says if Fox was around next season and decided to keep Moore as the starter instead of drafting a QB or signing a free-agent, he would be excoriated by every know-it-all in this thread.

people are (rightly) so tired of Delhomme that they're making Moore out to be something he's not.

neither quarterback is the future.

exactly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol, how the hell could you call that ball to Smith a bad throw... That was an amazing throw and a good adjustment. Jake can't get anywhere near that length with anywhere near that accuracy at this point in his career. EDIT: That was like a 60 yard toss - that kind of distance is something not many QBs can keep good accuracy with, and Moore was accurate enough that Smith easily adjusted to it. He slowed down, yes, but not like he's had to with some other balls he's been tossed this year...

He made some very nice throws, and he was able to stretch some plays by escaping the pocket.

Moore being 'the future'? Don't know. But I do know that none of the aforementioned QBs gave much hint as to just how good they would be in their first game as a starter in two years.

Give Moore some time. His stats were deceptive; this game was about the first two drives getting plays and the Panthers riding those drives. The coaches took the ball out of his hands on just about every 3rd down play of the 2nd half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol, how the hell could you call that ball to Smith a bad throw... That was an amazing throw and a good adjustment.

it was a fuging horrible throw. if your reciever has to run ten feet to the left of his original route to catch the ball you threw, it was a horrible throw.

not that delhomme would've have done any better, but the point here is that we need a quarterback who can make these throws. we can't settle for a zero-touchdown 1-interception performance against an 1-10 team just because it's better than delhomme would've done.

moore is not the future.

delhomme is not the future.

someone else is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we can't settle for a zero-touchdown 1-interception performance against an 1-10 team just because it's better than delhomme would've done.

That's spot on, except for assuming that anyone wants to settle with today's performance. Even the biggest Moore homer wants improvement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it was a fuging horrible throw. if your reciever has to run ten feet to the left of his original route to catch the ball you threw, it was a horrible throw.

not that delhomme would've have done any better, but the point here is that we need a quarterback who can make these throws. we can't settle for a zero-touchdown 1-interception performance against an 1-10 team just because it's better than delhomme would've done.

moore is not the future.

delhomme is not the future.

someone else is.

i guess jeff george is..he can throw it over them mountains..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The throw was not horrible. Please, go watch it again. I have, over and over. Smith did not need to go back for it at all, he just had to direct himself a couple yards into the middle of the field - while still running - and he only slowed a slight bit. The ball traveled 60 yards in the air and it still landed in Smith's hands with enough time for him to run down the field for a few extra yards. It was a good play. Could Manning, Brees, or Brady thrown it better? Perhaps. But that was our longest pass completion this year, and probably the longest throw we've seen in a LONG time.

I'm not saying Moore is the future. I'm just saying that going all batshit crazy about how he's "not the future" after one game is ridiculous, especially one game in which he only threw the ball 20 times and it was his first start in ages. Give the guy some time before you start clamoring. He's 3-1 as a starter, with average stats. We'll see how he does with a real test at NE next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The throw was not horrible. Please, go watch it again. I have, over and over. Smith did not need to go back for it at all, he just had to direct himself a couple yards into the middle of the field - while still running - and he only slowed a slight bit. The ball traveled 60 yards in the air and it still landed in Smith's hands with enough time for him to run down the field for a few extra yards. It was a good play. Could Manning, Brees, or Brady thrown it better? Perhaps. But that was our longest pass completion this year, and probably the longest throw we've seen in a LONG time.

I'm not saying Moore is the future. I'm just saying that going all batshit crazy about how he's "not the future" after one game is ridiculous, especially one game in which he only threw the ball 20 times and it was his first start in ages. Give the guy some time before you start clamoring. He's 3-1 as a starter, with average stats. We'll see how he does with a real test at NE next week.

i never said he had to go back for the ball - he had to cut to the left by a huge margin. if a good throw hits the reciever in stride in his route, then by definition that was a horrible throw, because it hit smith in stride because he completely changed his route. jake would get reamed if he made a throw like that, and moore should too.

that said, i agree that he should be given more time. i'm in favor of him playing through the end of the season, as we've got nothing else to lose. i hope i'm wrong (but i don't think i am.)

Its also the happiest Smith has been all season.

i'm willing to bet he was happier with his two touchdowns versus Atlanta.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i never said he had to go back for the ball - he had to cut to the left by a huge margin. if a good throw hits the reciever in stride in his route, then by definition that was a horrible throw, because it hit smith in stride because he completely changed his route. jake would get reamed if he made a throw like that, and moore should too.

that said, i agree that he should be given more time. i'm in favor of him playing through the end of the season, as we've got nothing else to lose. i hope i'm wrong (but i don't think i am.)

i'm willing to bet he was happier with his two touchdowns versus Atlanta.

LOL. Maybe you missed the Jets game last week when Delhomme underthrew Smith by 10 yards on a deep route when he was wide open. THAT is horrible throw. Moore's pass to Smith was not a horrible throw. It wasn't perfect because Smith had to slightly adjust his route (not 10 feet or whatever you say). Still, it hit him in stride and was far enough away from the safety that it was never in danger of being intercepted and could only be caught by Smith. I'd say that's a decent pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i never said he had to go back for the ball - he had to cut to the left by a huge margin. if a good throw hits the reciever in stride in his route, then by definition that was a horrible throw, because it hit smith in stride because he completely changed his route. jake would get reamed if he made a throw like that, and moore should too.

that said, i agree that he should be given more time. i'm in favor of him playing through the end of the season, as we've got nothing else to lose. i hope i'm wrong (but i don't think i am.)

Part of what makes a quality receiver is the ability to react to a ball while it's in the air. Moore delivered the ball as close to where Smith was running as he could - and it was more accurate than what most could toss in this league I bet. Smith was able to adjust to the ball in mid air quite easily (and he didn't have to go ten feet to his left, more like 3) because it didn't require him to vastly change his route, stop, backpedal, anything. He barely slowed, and he caught it while still in stride enough to take it a few extra yards.

You and I just view the play differently. I see it as a nice deep pass that was put in a spot the receiver could easily adjust to. You see it as a terrible throw that was put some place that forced an adjustment. I guess the difference is that I don't consider the adjustment to be indicative of a terrible throw.

EDIT: About Smith, I think that he was fired up because he knows that Jake just can't hit that ball anymore - his accuracy is too far off. Moore is his best shot to get back into this offense in a major way and he knows it. Smith does care about his stats, but I think he wants to feel like he's making a difference. That play is really what put the game away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do
    • No one had posted in a month.  I don't think any of us were watching
    • Here is how this draft could get mind-blowingly complicated--Interesting comment about Jags floating the Jeanty idea to lure Chicago into a trade.  I have to think Ben Johnson is going to duplicate in many ways the success he had in Detroit, and I have to think their free agency was following the blueprint Carolina designed last year (one that the Saints designed before them with Brees) and they upgraded all of their interior linemen.  RT in Chicago is set; Johnson loves RT Darnell Wright.  However, at LT, Braxton Jones is coming off a December injury and is considered to be in a competition for the position this year by at least a few fans on the Bears Wire.  His PFF score, however, was solid, posting an 80+ score in pass protection and 70+ score in run blocking.  He is in his prime.  However, in some of their fan mocks, the Bears are taking a LT.  I thought they needed an Edge to play 4-3 strong side across from Sweat, but they signed Odeyingbo to a pretty big contract in March. For the Bears, in my view, it comes down to TE or Running Back. Kmet is their #1 TE and he had 474 yards in that role, which was 25th in the NFL last season for TEs.  Adding Warren would help upgrade the TE spot and give them the ability to add around an estimated 80 yards of production per game.  The Bears have D'Andre Swift at RB, but could use a RB to pair with him for a desired 2 RB attack.  So if I am Da Bears, I stay at 10 and take Warren.  If the Jags want to move on from Etienne, then they will take Jeanty. I think, if I were the Jags (with 10 picks this year) I would take Mason Graham and not try to get an 11th pick.  It is a need position, and it seems to me the only reason they are toying with the idea of moving on from Etienne is because Jeanty is on the board.  That, to me, would be a luxury pick. New GM, I think he does not get cute--they take Graham if they stay at 5.  I might say the Jags' biggest need is Corner.  #5 is too rich for Will Johnson, but remember, they have 10 picks.  could they move up with Cleveland and take Hunter, giving them a CB and WR threat?  To me, with the draft capital they have, that is the move they should make.  Cleveland then could move back to #5.  Remember, Nick Chubb is an aging (29) free agent coming off an injury--so he is gone.  With an additional second rounder, the Browns move back and take Jeanty to give Flacco a running game. The Jags pick is very interesting, but I would not be surprised to see them move up. 
×
×
  • Create New...