Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carr’s destination betting odds


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, OldhamA said:

You aren't signing Carr then drafting a first round QB in 2023.

He's 32 in March - he gives you 4 years of high level play to find your franchise QB. It's a no brainer if he's interested.

Agree. If Reich ends up being the guy, Carr would be our Alex Smith. 3 years or so to right the ship and then we make a big reach for a QB down the road. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m not exactly sure how I feel about this. I think he’s a guy who could be a high level starter for another 2-3 years. Would you draft a raw Richardson to sit behind him or would you move towards another position of need? Next year’s crop of QB’s are good as well. Hence why I’m not exactly sure where I am with all of this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tarheel119 said:

I’m not exactly sure how I feel about this. I think he’s a guy who could be a high level starter for another 2-3 years. Would you draft a raw Richardson to sit behind him or would you move towards another position of need? Next year’s crop of QB’s are good as well. Hence why I’m not exactly sure where I am with all of this. 

REALLY good.  I'm down with a 2-year rental.  I'd rather go a cheaper route though, Minshew.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

Good point 

image.thumb.png.f856e3fe2bad885a8a352f2e0201b7ee.png

Yeah, I see this point, but Carr would not be the franchise QB--he would be the bridge--I get the feeling that they would still be in the market for a young QB this year or next.

And maybe they think they can get Darnold (if they re-sign him) playing at a decent level---I dunno.

I still think we draft a Young QB this year.

However, signing Carr and keeping your draft picks is a bit appealing---considering who we'd end up with at #9.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Tarheel119 said:

I’m not exactly sure how I feel about this. I think he’s a guy who could be a high level starter for another 2-3 years. Would you draft a raw Richardson to sit behind him or would you move towards another position of need? Next year’s crop of QB’s are good as well. Hence why I’m not exactly sure where I am with all of this. 

With a Carr and this staff, I could see us drafting next year in the 16-24 range. Or we better be if we are dropping $40 million on a QB.

Anyway, how are we getting from 16+ to #1 overall? Especially when 9x out of 10 the #1 pick needs a QB and ain't budging.

If we are drafting a QB, if we want to trade up and want our pick of the class, this is the only year to do that. Otherwise we are moving up to 8-10 to grab someone that falls. I really, really do not see us picking in the top 10 next year.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A big part of me thinks this is Carolina  returning the favor that happened with them coming in and driving up the Watson stuff.  I'm pretty sure  the more we drive his price up, the less the Saints have to spend. Who knows but interested to see how this shakes out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Luciu5 said:

With a Carr and this staff, I could see us drafting next year in the 16-24 range. Or we better be if we are dropping $40 million on a QB.

Anyway, how are we getting from 16+ to #1 overall? Especially when 9x out of 10 the #1 pick needs a QB and ain't budging.

If we are drafting a QB, if we want to trade up and want our pick of the class, this is the only year to do that. Otherwise we are moving up to 8-10 to grab someone that falls. I really, really do not see us picking in the top 10 next year.

Wait why do we have to get to #1 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Luciu5 said:

With a Carr and this staff, I could see us drafting next year in the 16-24 range. Or we better be if we are dropping $40 million on a QB.

Anyway, how are we getting from 16+ to #1 overall? Especially when 9x out of 10 the #1 pick needs a QB and ain't budging.

If we are drafting a QB, if we want to trade up and want our pick of the class, this is the only year to do that. Otherwise we are moving up to 8-10 to grab someone that falls. I really, really do not see us picking in the top 10 next year.

And I’d bet Tampa ends up with that #1 pick and Caleb Williams next year. They’re going to be bad.

I don’t want Carr at all. Would rather go draft, but if the panthers bring him in, I hope it works. I doubt it, though.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

Wait why do we have to get to #1 

I hear two qb names over and over here for next year. If they maintain their trajectory they aren't falling to 8 or 10. And if we are taking the 3rd or 4th qb next year, and trading up to do so ?? I think I'd rather go to 1 this year. Seems asinine if that is what people are thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jb2288 said:

Agree. If Reich ends up being the guy, Carr would be our Alex Smith. 3 years or so to right the ship and then we make a big reach for a QB down the road. 

Yup, and iirc, off the top of my head, I think Smith was only the starter in KC for a year or two prior to them drafting Mahomes and then started Mahomes' rookie season and then was traded.  And all due respect to Smith, but I think Carr is a much more complete QB and a lot more dynamic than Smith was.  It would be the ideal scenario, imo.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jackie Lee said:

This is not a positive breakdown of his last game. Seems like he's regressed to basically Sam/Baker quality. Bad footwork, panic throws, check downs when he should be taking shots down field..We've had enough of that the last couple years

 

Yeah, but I just don't know what all tou can take from last season for him...  McDaniels is a poo coach, the organization is dysfunctional, and he has how many years of good tape before last season's debacle?  I don't think a QB just falls off a cliff like that at 32 barring injury.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Agreed. A healthy bit from column A (stats) and column B (film) paints the most accurate picture, which is currently that Bryce is not performing up to the standard a 1st round QB (let alone drafted #1 overall) is expected to (statistically). When we dig into the film to see why, we see that while he's having his struggles (not stepping up in the pocket, bailing out early, hesitating on some throws, making occasional bad reads, etc) the team that surrounded him last season was simply awful. Bottom 5 defense, bottom 5 OL, bottom 5 weapons... but somehow one player has to overcome ALL of that in their rookie season? Yeesh... Taking this season into consideration, he started where he left off last season and was rightfully benched. Since starting again, the team has gotten on its first winning streak in a few years and he's made good plays to keep them in the game. Is he lighting it up? Nah... but he is beginning to show the reason so many draftniks had him as QB1a for his class. Re: what the team does next season... who friggin knows anymore at this point T_T. Resign Dalton? Sign Jones? Draft somebody in the mid-to-late rounds? Go with another UFA? Maybe grab an FA that can compete with Bryce for the starting position and draft a rookie to sit and develop? Might be best of both worlds for the team, but ugh... not a fun position to still be in with question marks throughout the position group.
    • Yeah, this is basically the same as asking, "What if Bryce Young suddenly had Patrick Mahomes brain, how would he do?" It isn't happening. This ship is beyond sailed. Send him somewhere else, let us move on and him move on. 
    • Dalton is too close to starting right now. If it hadn't been for a car accident, he still would be. Switching Dalton for Jones does nothing except reduce the backup's age by a decade. One is in his NFL prime, the other is almost in his NFL grave. Not a horrible move if you're trying to improve the team. We've got to get better as a team and a lateral move like that would improve the team. The problem isn't that he's close to starting. The problem is we have a GM that signed off on BY and didn't bring in any serious QB competition for camp, a HC that said yeah, he's my guy until BY poo the bed so bad he couldn't start him, and an offense that's limited because BY can't make all the throws a normal NFL QB can.  The problem isn't that Jones could be an improvement as a backup QB. The problem is he could be better than our "franchise" QB. 
×
×
  • Create New...