Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lamar Jackson Rumors: Ravens Could Consider Trading QB for 'Windfall' of Draft Picks

GOAT

By GOAT,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CamWhoaaCam Grand Master

CamWhoaaCam

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, TheBigKat said:

I love Lamar but if he’s truly available I can’t see any possible scenario he wouldn’t be a Jet. That team can win IMMEDIATELY with their studded rookies so they’d throw a bunch of picks to make it happen

Jets all in on Aaron Rodgers.

 

 

 

 

The Ravens trading him to the NFC if they do decide to trade him.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CBDellinger Experienced

CBDellinger

Posted
Posted (edited)
49 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Seems like Cam is the poster boy for every QB who runs.

People said the same thing about Josh Allen this year saying he is gonna end up like Cam.

 

My question why wasn't this a thing before Cam?

 

Vick never had that label. 

People are stupid.  Cam didn’t get hurt because of his running ability.  He got hurt chasing down an int that KB loaded on and later again from  a one in a million shot in the pocket via TJ Watt.  
 

it’s a stupid uniformed narrative that his running did him in. 

Edited by CBDellinger
  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, KatsAzz said:

I like Lamar Jackson but it would hamstring the Panthers, considering what it would take to obtain him.

Why do you bold face every post?

Anyway…no way in hell do I trade what it will cost for Lamar.  He is already breaking down and was never a good passer.  Didn’t we already see this decline with a running QB?

Jesus…no.  Baltimore will take all those picks and go get CJ Stroud.  Lol.  Hell no

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheProcess Rising Star

TheProcess

Posted
Posted (edited)

Absolutely not!!!  Too many picks to pay too much money for a player that has missed 1/3 of his teams games the last 2 years with a playing style that will invite more injuries. Add in the Panthers luck, and this probably turns disastrous.

Use the picks to go get your QB in the draft. A rookie scale QB allows you to use that Lamar money to fill other holes in free agency.

Edited by TheProcess
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
heel31ok Experienced

heel31ok

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

I don't know about this one, I was for it earlier in the season before yet another injury derailed his season, he might have already peaked and he'll never be the same MVP level he was (due to injuries).

I am all in on the Stroud bus, trade those picks to Chicago

Lol...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CamWhoaaCam Grand Master

CamWhoaaCam

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, BullCityP said:

People saying trade those picks to get a QB on a rookie contract have to realize the QB has to actually be GOOD to win anything. Lamar is a known commodity 

Not only is he a known commodity he's shown he can take a offense with no weapons and still win a bunch of games.

 

The thing people keep overlooking with Lamar is he wins games even with a weak roster. Reminds me of Cam in that sense.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
55 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Not only is he a known commodity he's shown he can take a offense with no weapons and still win a bunch of games.

The thing people keep overlooking with Lamar is he wins games even with a weak roster. Reminds me of Cam in that sense.

He's also "known" to have injury issues and fade in the playoffs.

(things that are kind of relevant when you're talking about giving up a massive haul of pics or guaranteeing a contract)

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...