Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lamar Jackson Rumors: Ravens Could Consider Trading QB for 'Windfall' of Draft Picks

GOAT

By GOAT,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CamWhoaaCam Grand Master

CamWhoaaCam

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, CBDellinger said:

Llamar ain’t coming here.  He’s gonna go to a big market if, and it’s a big if, he is traded.  

Lamar going to whoever pays him the money.

 

If Tepper chased after Watson im sure he will at least put in a offer for Lamar.

 

My bet is the Jets offer something crazy they seem to be the most desperate team for a QB right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Lamar going to whoever pays him the money.

 

If Tepper chased after Watson im sure he will at least put in a offer for Lamar.

 

My bet is the Jets offer something crazy they seem to be the most desperate team for a QB right now.

This makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CamWhoaaCam Grand Master

CamWhoaaCam

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Don't do it. Look at the two teams that traded king's ransoms for QBs then proceeded to give them massive contracts to boot this past off-season. They suck and they have limited resources available to change that.

So are we just going to compare every QB to Russell Wilson now?

Watson hasn't played football in 2 years and you writing him off after he played 6 games?

 

Cmon these guys could easily bounce back next year. Lets wait before we say they are washed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

So are we just going to compare every QB to Russell Wilson now?

Watson hasn't played football in 2 years and you writing him off after he played 6 games?

 

Cmon these guys could easily bounce back next year. Lets wait before we say they are washed.

There's no fair trade value for an elite franchise QB in his prime. If one is potentially available, it's a huge red flag. Watson's red flag was obvious. Wilson looks washed.

What's Lamar's red flag? I'm for letting someone else mortgage their franchise to find out.

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CamWhoaaCam Grand Master

CamWhoaaCam

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

There's no fair trade value for an elite franchise QB in his prime. If one is potentially available, it's a huge red flag. Watson's red flag was obvious. Wilson looks washed.

What's Lamar's red flag? I'm for letting someone else mortgage their franchise to find out.

Lamar hasn't even hit his prime yet.lol


Check his record as a starting QB. The dude wins games. His problem is he can't stay healthy. 

 

It's crazy you rather trade the farm for the unknown Stroud, but not do the same for a proven guy in Lamar.

 

If it came down to trading the farm give me Lamar easily. I love Stroud but he's still a unknown. Lamar with a below average offense will still get you 10 wins by himself. Lets not act like Lamar Jackson isn't elite when he's playing.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Lamar hasn't even hit his prime yet.lol


Check his record as a starting QB. The dude wins games. His problem is he can't stay healthy. 

 

It's crazy you rather trade the farm for the unknown Stroud, but not do the same for a proven guy in Lamar.

 

If it came down to trading the farm give me Lamar easily. I love Stroud but he's still a unknown. Lamar with a below average offense will still get you 10 wins by himself. Lets not act like Lamar Jackson isn't elite when he's playing.

I haven't advocated trading the farm for a draft prospect either.

Inability to stay healthy is a HUGE red flag.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mills Rising Star

Mills

Posted
Posted (edited)

If Fitt’s plan is to insert a QB on a rookie contract Into a ready made roster, then Gotdammit stick to the plan. Any plan, just have one and execute it.

Id love to have Lamar here. Division title would likely be solidified. But how about just sticking to the plan for once. Please

Edited by Mills
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • LinvilleGorge
      2024 College Football Thread

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...