I feel very strongly about this... Derek Carr.

[NanuqoftheNorth]

11 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

Is it even possible (this far into it) that the Raiders management still doesn't realize that they'll never find a team willing to give up picks and take on Carr's 40 million dollar contract?  And that in the unlikely event that the Raiders do, Carr is more likely than not to exercise his contractual right to turn down the trade?

What were the Raiders even thinking?  Cut Carr and move on already.

Edited February 4, 2023 by NanuqoftheNorth

[NanuqoftheNorth]

 

[Sean Payton's Vicodin]

He's not good enough to win a SB, knowing that, whats the point in getting him?

[top dawg]

Nah, man. The INTs are too real.

[frankw]

All I know is I had him as my QB2 in fantasy and he was boooooooty. Was it all him? Probably not. But I see the same reasons why he would work here that were used to justify acquiring both Darnold and Mayfield. The one thing those two had going for them was their age. Carr on the other hand will be 32 next month. Learn from our mistakes already people come on.

[parker]

I'd be more happy with Carr than giving up draft picks to move up to snag a guy.  We have too many needs.

But there are some decent free agent QBs out there too.  I think we get one and see what is available at our draft pick.

 

[Cdparr7]

I think they need to make a move for him. Otherwise, they are going to be deciding between drafting McKee or resigning Darnold. 
 

There young QBs in the draft will be gone.