Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The QB School : Breaking down AR and Levis


Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, rebelrouser said:

That makes me feel better about AR but he was playing against the #36 defense vs. Levis against the 1st.  UK oline did Levis no favors but UGA dline is stout. 

How about Levis vs the #131 secondary at Tennessee? Their ranking may have went up after that game lol

Kentucky
Kentucky Passing
 
TEAM
 
C/ATT YDS AVG TD INT   QBR  
16/27 98 3.6 0 3   13.4  
16/27 98 3.6 0 3   --
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

How about Levis vs the #131 secondary at Tennessee? Their ranking may have went up after that game lol

Kentucky
Kentucky Passing
 
TEAM
 
C/ATT YDS AVG TD INT   QBR  
16/27 98 3.6 0 3   13.4  
16/27 98 3.6 0 3   --

Yeah I watched that game (live in Knoxville so it was hyped up around here). There wasn’t much he could do. They didn’t open up the passing game until it was out of hand. When it was like 30-6 halfway though the 3rd he did start throwing up bad balls, but to me his only other option was take a sack.

His first pick around 3:15 is just the WR getting hit and the ball shooting out of his hands. Check out around 4:00 of his 3rd down hike and immediate sacks by at least 2 different defenders busting through his terrible OL. It does get bad halfway through the 3rd though.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah I watched that game (live in Knoxville so it was hyped up around here). There wasn’t much he could do. They didn’t open up the passing game until it was out of hand. When it was like 30-6 halfway though the 3rd he did start throwing up bad balls, but to me his only other option was take a sack.

His first pick around 3:15 is just the WR getting hit and the ball shooting out of his hands. Check out around 4:00 of his 3rd down hike and immediate sacks by at least 2 different defenders busting through his terrible OL. It does get bad halfway through the 3rd though.

Yeah I caught the tail end of that game live, brutal

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nah I wanna see these NFL evaluators talking about his prospects at WR aren't good because I would LOVE to see thier explanations 
    • You do realize that raw stats don't make someone a better or worse player, right? To begin with, the last time I checked, 1,319 is more yards than 1,258, so T-Mac had more yards (but I'll forgive you as a typo there and say you meant catches lol), but that's before even factoring in that Hunter did his in 13 games vs 12 for T-Mac because Arizona didn't make a bowl game. It's also completely ignoring the team around each player.  If you think Hunter having the 8th place finisher in the Heisman voting at QB isn't going to result in helping his top WRs stats, then you're sticking your head in the sand to purposefully not see it. Hunter's QB had 353 completions for 4,134 yards and 37 TDs vs T-Mac's QB who had 260 completions for 2,958 yards and 18 TDs. But sure, let's rank NFL prospects by their stats and say the guy with more catches and TDs is the better prospect.  So on that note, I now change my mind, T-Mac is no longer the best WR in the draft, it's Nick Nash who had 104 rec, 1,382 yards, and 16 TDs, all numbers better than Hunter's... because that's how this is done, right? As I've said before, if someone wants to like a player better than someone else that's totally fair, but come with real reasons, talk about their play, but to talk about things like stats as your reasoning, when you ignore the obvious and massive flaws in using those stats in that way, just makes you look dumb.
    • Nah you don't go out and put up the numbers he did without being able to run routes dude is a football junky so he works on his craft he isn’t THAT much more athletic than other players to just be able to go out and do whatever and succeed at that level 
×
×
  • Create New...