Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do you trust Reich to find us (and develop) a franchise QB?


t96
 Share

Do you trust Reich to find us (and develop) a franchise QB?  

164 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you trust Reich to find us (and develop) a franchise QB?



Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, carpanfan96 said:

I trust that he along with Fitt, Morgan and the scouting department can find a qb for the future of the franchise. I think that qb will be Stroud 

I think we get Stroud at 9. Young be pick #2 & another team will fall in love with Levi’s. This would be an ideal scenario saving our draft capital with a potential move back to late first. round. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, t96 said:

Which is why I was such a big fan of Steichen -- he has experience developing Herbert and Hurts. Herbert was picked high but was by no means a unanimous top QB choice and we could get a similar caliber prospect around 9 or maybe with a smaller trade up. Hurts was a 2nd rounder and many were not high on him at all pre-draft. 

Same, although I had a brief affair with Ben Johnson.

However, I give Reich about a 40% chance of busting, Steichen I wouldn't have had that much hope for success....however if he did succeed, the highs would be higher.

I think Frank can bring some consistency, and I'm guessing that Tepper is ready for some of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Puresteel55 said:

How about trading our 1st for Purdy or Lance if (a big if) one becomes available. Having either of them along with Corral would be a plus as I see it.

 

Not a chance in hell. Purdy has a tiny sample size in an elite offense, he may not even be that good. Nick Foles and others have had similar stretches of even better play than him. Lance hasn't shown enough in the NFL yet to be worth even a 2nd. I'd trade a 3rd for him but not any more, certainly not 9th overall

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, t96 said:

Not a chance in hell. Purdy has a tiny sample size in an elite offense, he may not even be that good. Nick Foles and others have had similar stretches of even better play than him. Lance hasn't shown enough in the NFL yet to be worth even a 2nd. I'd trade a 3rd for him but not any more, certainly not 9th overall

Same thought applies to those qbs in the draft, maybe 2nd or a 3rd , certainly not 9th overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They reached for Pickett, so they are not immune to it.  I could see that as well.  I just think the Colts are flying under the radar and they have been too quiet concerning their QB situation--of course, they could think Jones is their guy (they had a good one named Jones a long time ago) but I think they are done with the Richardson experiment.   Even if I believed in Jones, I would still draft a QB--I also read one mock that said the Jets would take Sanders if he falls to 7---I disagree, but I was once wrong and it still bothers me.
    • I just switched to prime video with fanduel south. Will I be able to watch the Canes playoff games still?
    • I mean, you can use that "logic," but the problem is that most practice squad players, backups or average guys don't put the play on film that Wharton did when given their opportunities.  Perhaps you'll end up right, but I don't think that just because a guy has been in a rotation makes him inherently less productive because he gets more snaps. I will say that the KC fans I've seen on social media loved him, and considered him their second best DT,  regardless of his "rotational" status, and generally considered him a dawg, so I'm going to give him the benefit of doubt until he shows otherwise.
×
×
  • Create New...