Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report. Panthers pivoting from Shane Steichen


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, panthers55 said:

Rivera was 10th on the list of coaches who go for it on 4 and short when they should.  The bottom number is total times versus when it an advantage to do so.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nfl.com/_amp/nfl-s-best-fourth-down-decision-makers-kevin-stefanski-john-harbaugh-

 

among-top-c

 

Don't you get tired of being wrong all the time???

simply going for it on 4rth and short doesnt make you a aggressive coach

 

and if you read the graph thats really not what its saying either

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, panthers55 said:

You keep trying to make everyone wrong because they didn't value steichen instead of looking at the elephant in the room which is that things have to be a good fit and they weren't. Eventually we will find out more about what happened. Until then it is clear that he wasn't our guy and may or may not be ready to be a head coach. But until then, feel free to continue with your baseless comments and  speculation based on your agenda.

lol I don’t care who Dave tepper thinks which guy is the right fit 

please continue to shill for the billionaire hedge fund manager a bit more though, I promise he cares nothing about you 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

simply going for it on 4rth and short doesnt make you a aggressive coach

 

and if you read the graph thats really not what its saying either

It is listing the coaches who are  making the best choices when they decide to go for it. Going for it all the time and failing doesn't make you aggressive it makes you stupid. So yeah Rivera is not only aggressive but smart when he attempts it and has a good chance of success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

It is listing the coaches who are  making the best choices when they decide to go for it. Going for it all the time and failing doesn't make you aggressive it makes you stupid. So yeah Rivera is not only aggressive but smart when he attempts it and has a good chance of success.

Bro you are really arguing that Ron Rivera is an aggressive coach.  I really cannot respond to that type of stupidity.  Really man

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Bro you are really arguing that Ron Rivera is an aggressive coach.  I really cannot respond to that type of stupidity.  Really man

Of course you have no response since I just showed you the facts and it counters your baseless speculation. Your motto is always don't let the facts get in your way......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/frank-reich-named-panthers-head-coach-john-and-billy/id1523253913?i=1000597362430

 

Billy marshall and Ellis absolutely unload on the hiring process and how absolutely moronic it was to simply dismiss him as a candidate from a bad zoom interview  What I was saying all along.  Absolute must listen about the process and the interviewing of DC's

 

starts around 30 minutes in

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/frank-reich-named-panthers-head-coach-john-and-billy/id1523253913?i=1000597362430

 

Billy marshall and Ellis absolutely unload on the hiring process and how absolutely moronic it was to simply dismiss him as a candidate from a bad zoom interview  What I was saying all along.  Absolute must listen about the process and the interviewing of DC's

 

starts around 30 minutes in

from the minute reich was fired in indy, he probably became the front runner for us. he checks all the boxes they were looking for:

1) offensive minded

2) experienced and successful HC (no learning curve)

3) local/panther ties

i don't think anyone else really had a chance. i think they were burned out relying on potential as a deciding factor because of rhule.

i just hope they are burned out on trying to make a QB reclamation project your starting QB.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I think we were intrigued and tempted by young potential offensive wunderkinds, but ultimately after the Rhule flop I think Tepper wanted a safer alternative. 

That's why I kind of expect a young potential offensive wunderkind at OC. It gives him the best of both worlds. Safer, more experienced HC with exciting potential at OC. We'll see...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, rayzor said:

from the minute reich was fired in indy, he probably became the front runner for us. he checks all the boxes they were looking for:

1) offensive minded

2) experienced and successful HC (no learning curve)

3) local/panther ties

i don't think anyone else really had a chance. i think they were burned out relying on potential as a deciding factor because of rhule.

i just hope they are burned out on trying to make a QB reclamation project your starting QB.

To be fair, Steichen has not really generated near the buzz folks thought he would. Sure he has a second interview with the Colts, but that situation is a mess.

Edited by Jaxel
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, rayzor said:

i just hope they are burned out on trying to make a QB reclamation project your starting QB.

Agree with this, although I do think there's a notable difference between Rhule picking and coaching a retread, and Reich picking and coaching a retread. Maybe this is just me being optimistic, but I'd like to think if Reich signs one it'd just be to be a bridge QB and not a long term solution.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Agreed. A healthy bit from column A (stats) and column B (film) paints the most accurate picture, which is currently that Bryce is not performing up to the standard a 1st round QB (let alone drafted #1 overall) is expected to (statistically). When we dig into the film to see why, we see that while he's having his struggles (not stepping up in the pocket, bailing out early, hesitating on some throws, making occasional bad reads, etc) the team that surrounded him last season was simply awful. Bottom 5 defense, bottom 5 OL, bottom 5 weapons... but somehow one player has to overcome ALL of that in their rookie season? Yeesh... Taking this season into consideration, he started where he left off last season and was rightfully benched. Since starting again, the team has gotten on its first winning streak in a few years and he's made good plays to keep them in the game. Is he lighting it up? Nah... but he is beginning to show the reason so many draftniks had him as QB1a for his class. Re: what the team does next season... who friggin knows anymore at this point T_T. Resign Dalton? Sign Jones? Draft somebody in the mid-to-late rounds? Go with another UFA? Maybe grab an FA that can compete with Bryce for the starting position and draft a rookie to sit and develop? Might be best of both worlds for the team, but ugh... not a fun position to still be in with question marks throughout the position group.
    • Yeah, this is basically the same as asking, "What if Bryce Young suddenly had Patrick Mahomes brain, how would he do?" It isn't happening. This ship is beyond sailed. Send him somewhere else, let us move on and him move on. 
    • Dalton is too close to starting right now. If it hadn't been for a car accident, he still would be. Switching Dalton for Jones does nothing except reduce the backup's age by a decade. One is in his NFL prime, the other is almost in his NFL grave. Not a horrible move if you're trying to improve the team. We've got to get better as a team and a lateral move like that would improve the team. The problem isn't that he's close to starting. The problem is we have a GM that signed off on BY and didn't bring in any serious QB competition for camp, a HC that said yeah, he's my guy until BY poo the bed so bad he couldn't start him, and an offense that's limited because BY can't make all the throws a normal NFL QB can.  The problem isn't that Jones could be an improvement as a backup QB. The problem is he could be better than our "franchise" QB. 
×
×
  • Create New...