Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pantherj Mock Draft(s)


pantherj
 Share

Recommended Posts

1455486466_Screenshot2023-04-14at23-57-422023NFLUserMockDraft1505047NFLMockDraftDatabase.thumb.png.fa3ee5a5c375c487fe92de589165b6f0.png

Unrealistic alert. Felix to OLB. Simpson to replace Luvu at ILB. DJ to CB#2. Ika to NT, Brown moves to DE. Roy to DE or backup. That defense...

CBs Horn, Turner, Jackson, Henderson. Chinn can play nickel. Filthy lineup.

ROLB - Burns/Barno

LOLB - Felix/YGM

RILB - Shaq/Luvu

LILB - Simpson/Chinn/Luvu

I would love this lineup for our LBs, and beef up front with Ika, Brown, Tuttle, Williams, Roy and others.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like to me there are a lot of defensive players in this draft who could help us transition to the 3-4 very well, but not a lot of players who would impact our offense that much.

Bringing in a #1 TE, keeping Ian as #2 TE, and veteran WRs on the roster who are expected to start, and a very weak WR draft class, and no picks in the first outside of a QB selection, and the second round onward with no #1 WR prospects, and an already built o-line, the picture is pretty clear now.

It's looking highly likely that we will use this draft to transition our defense to the 3-4. Chark will have to be our #1 WR, Marshall #2, and slot will be Thielen. We are not using the 39th pick to upgrade Thielen in the slot. That makes no sense. Thielen is here to start, and he is backed up by Shi Smith.

This is going to be a defensive draft unless an offensive weapon falls a long way and into our lap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about the o-line? I do think we should take a guy who is a tweener like Brady Christensen again. A guy who can play OG/OT, that way we are covered better depth-wise. Brady was a great pick because if Moton goes down (he was hurting most of last season and couldn't play as well as in the past) then Brady can go out to RT, and we plug in a backup guard, like another tweener draft pick. 

Edited by pantherj
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nah I wanna see these NFL evaluators talking about his prospects at WR aren't good because I would LOVE to see thier explanations 
    • You do realize that raw stats don't make someone a better or worse player, right? To begin with, the last time I checked, 1,319 is more yards than 1,258, so T-Mac had more yards (but I'll forgive you as a typo there and say you meant catches lol), but that's before even factoring in that Hunter did his in 13 games vs 12 for T-Mac because Arizona didn't make a bowl game. It's also completely ignoring the team around each player.  If you think Hunter having the 8th place finisher in the Heisman voting at QB isn't going to result in helping his top WRs stats, then you're sticking your head in the sand to purposefully not see it. Hunter's QB had 353 completions for 4,134 yards and 37 TDs vs T-Mac's QB who had 260 completions for 2,958 yards and 18 TDs. But sure, let's rank NFL prospects by their stats and say the guy with more catches and TDs is the better prospect.  So on that note, I now change my mind, T-Mac is no longer the best WR in the draft, it's Nick Nash who had 104 rec, 1,382 yards, and 16 TDs, all numbers better than Hunter's... because that's how this is done, right? As I've said before, if someone wants to like a player better than someone else that's totally fair, but come with real reasons, talk about their play, but to talk about things like stats as your reasoning, when you ignore the obvious and massive flaws in using those stats in that way, just makes you look dumb.
    • Nah you don't go out and put up the numbers he did without being able to run routes dude is a football junky so he works on his craft he isn’t THAT much more athletic than other players to just be able to go out and do whatever and succeed at that level 
×
×
  • Create New...