Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL owners ending revenue sharing effective in March


carpanfan96

Recommended Posts

The good news here is unlike Baseball or Basketball, in Football you cannot buy a championship. How far has all of Snyder's FA hording got him?

With that being said, I don't like the idea of eliminating revenue sharing - it's gonna mean more teams move around and that's not good for the NFL as a whole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The good news here is unlike Baseball or Basketball, in Football you cannot buy a championship. How far has all of Snyder's FA hording got him?

With that being said, I don't like the idea of eliminating revenue sharing - it's gonna mean more teams move around and that's not good for the NFL as a whole.

Steelers, 49ers, Cowboys do you think any of them would have became dynasty's with no cap. IMO the cap is the reason for the NFL's exponential growth in the last decade and a half. I think it will end up hurting the big spending FO more in there pocket books in the long run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Panthers were very successful when there was no cap and we even spent a butt load when we first came into the league to get vet guys.

How can a team be successful when it hasn't even started playing yet? The NFL instituted a salary cap beginning in 1994, the year before the Panthers played their first game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if another CBO isn't signed the NFL will NEVER get to the point the MLB is unless rookie contracts get squashed to 2 years. Think about the average length of a baseball career compared to a NFL career. Football is the ultimate team sport and, while you do need good vets, a lot of players get 'used up' in their first 4-5 years.

The NFL always has and always will be about good drafting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's my take:

No revenue sharing and no salary cap won't prevent small market teams from winning. What it will do is make teams like the 'Skins and the 'Bitchs make the playoffs a lot more often than other teams. Any given team will still be able to win a Super Bowl. It's just that certain teams will consistently be good year in and year out, while smaller market teams will have playoff runs less often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we get any revenue sharing money and may even have to pay some so it won't hurt us. Plus with the changes in the CBA that will occur if things are uncapped at least Dallas, if they finish in the top 8, will not be able to sign free agents unless they lose some as well.

Plus if there is not a new CBA with a salary cap in 2011, we won't be playing football so the window for teams to sign free agents is going to be one year and there won't be a significant effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steelers, 49ers, Cowboys do you think any of them would have became dynasty's with no cap. IMO the cap is the reason for the NFL's exponential growth in the last decade and a half. I think it will end up hurting the big spending FO more in there pocket books in the long run.

Yup.

With out a cap, we're going to see the resurgence of the "purchased" teams like the 90's Cowboys, the 80's 49er's. Teams like Seattle, New Orleans and Buffalo will be always be at the bottom of the league.

The Panthers MIGHT benefit from this intially, as really the only other team with money to burn in our division is Atlanta. But if Jerry Richardson passes on, there will be a lot less money being pumped into the club (hopefully this won't happen, but given his age and health, it could). At that point, we would be hard pressed to have a decent team, or even be able to keep a club here.

This is definitely not good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...