Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

HC Candidate List


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

49 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Wilson doesn't look salvageable and is also in his 'no longer hungry' phase.

I agree with you except 1 thing.  Wilson looked so bad last year I think he needs to prove something. (So far he has made Carroll look like a pretty darn good coach)  Not sure that he can. Would be fun to have the media drool all over that pairing (Payton and Wilson) and then see it not succeed. 😎

Edited by ladypanther
  • Pie 3
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ladypanther said:

I agree with you except 1 thing.  Wilson looked so bad last year I think he needs to prove something. (So far he has made Carroll look like a pretty darn good coach)  Not sure that he can. Would be fun to have the media drool all over that pairing (Payton and Wilson) and then see it not succeed. 😎

That sounds amazing and I would love to see it in Denver.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike Florio and Charean Williams debate whether or not it would be a good fit for all involved parties.

Summary:

  • No lose situation for Payton if he goes to Denver. If Russell doesn't look better next year, it's because Russ can't be fixed, not because Payton failed.
  • Indy doesn't want him. Cardinals seem less likely after hiring GM. Down to Houston, Denver, or Carolina. They don't even discuss Houston much.
  • Payton has leverage. Can always go back to New Orleans and make it very awkward for them. New Orleans will make it work to get him to a new team.
  • Payton has incentive to return to coaching this year. He's going to make 20-25 million. Money he'll never see if he holds out.
  • Best spot for Payton is Carolina. Payton/Carolina would dominate the division "for years to come" with Payton.
  • Payton has said publicly no QB in place is not a problem. New Orleans had no QB when Payton took the job. They tried to get Romo, and settled for Brees after the Dolphins rejected him. He was competitive with Jameis Winston and Ian Book.

These are not my thoughts or opinions. I am only summarizing the video for those who may not have time to watch it.

Edited by trueblade
  • Pie 8
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, trueblade said:

Mike Florio and Charean Williams debate whether or not it would be a good fit for all involved parties.

Summary:

  • No lose situation for Payton if he goes to Denver. If Russell doesn't look better next year, it's because Russ can't be fixed, not because Payton failed.
  • Indy doesn't want him. Cardinals seem less likely after hiring GM. Down to Houston, Denver, or Carolina. They don't even discuss Houston much.
  • Payton has leverage. Can always go back to New Orleans and make it very awkward for them. New Orleans will make it work to get him to a new team.
  • Payton has incentive to return to coaching this year. He's going to make 20-25 million. Money he'll never see if he holds out.
  • Best spot for Payton is Carolina. Payton/Carolina would dominate the division "for years to come" with Payton.
  • Payton has said publicly no QB in place is not a problem. New Orleans had no QB when Payton took the job. They tried to get Romo, and settled for Brees after the Dolphins rejected him. He was competitive with Jameis Winston and Ian Book.

These are not my thoughts or opinions. I am only summarizing the video for those who may not have time to watch it.

Thanks for the summary!

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, trueblade said:

Mike Florio and Charean Williams debate whether or not it would be a good fit for all involved parties.

Summary:

  • No lose situation for Payton if he goes to Denver. If Russell doesn't look better next year, it's because Russ can't be fixed, not because Payton failed.
  • Indy doesn't want him. Cardinals seem less likely after hiring GM. Down to Houston, Denver, or Carolina. They don't even discuss Houston much.
  • Payton has leverage. Can always go back to New Orleans and make it very awkward for them. New Orleans will make it work to get him to a new team.
  • Payton has incentive to return to coaching this year. He's going to make 20-25 million. Money he'll never see if he holds out.
  • Best spot for Payton is Carolina. Payton/Carolina would dominate the division "for years to come" with Payton.
  • Payton has said publicly no QB in place is not a problem. New Orleans had no QB when Payton took the job. They tried to get Romo, and settled for Brees after the Dolphins rejected him. He was competitive with Jameis Winston and Ian Book.

These are not my thoughts or opinions. I am only summarizing the video for those who may not have time to watch it.

After watching that, there is a strong possibility that Payton works it out with Tepper if both sides want it to happen. I am torn on what I want, but it doesn't matter what we want or think is good for the franchise. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

I don't have a problem with Payton as head coach, but we better not give up two 1st round picks for him. I can live with next year's 1st, but anything more other than a 4th or lower on top of that is too much.

Agree 100% - 2 firsts is TOO MUCH

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm firmly on the Steichen or Kafka bus right now.  I'll try my best to be excited if it's Moore, Dorsey or Reich.  Still really unsure about retaining Wilks & highly doubt Evero or Caldwell is happening.

It's pretty much a wait and see at this point.  

Giants-Eagles could likely have our next HC on the sidelines.

Edited by Bear Hands
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 component on the Qb scenario. I'm pretty sure that Payton and the front office in New Orleans at the time did homework on Corral. I saw articles about it awhile back. Maybe(if they get Payton) they try the Brady or vet Qb and continue  to develop  Corral. One thing is for sure, if he sat behind Brady for a year or two with Payton at the helm... he would definitely  have 2 of the top Offensive minds to learn from. If he was ever going to succeed, that's the scenario  for him. No I know the hate for both Brady and Payton is paramount but I'm speaking on  possible logic. 

Edited by Lurk21
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nah I wanna see these NFL evaluators talking about his prospects at WR aren't good because I would LOVE to see thier explanations 
    • You do realize that raw stats don't make someone a better or worse player, right? To begin with, the last time I checked, 1,319 is more yards than 1,258, so T-Mac had more yards (but I'll forgive you as a typo there and say you meant catches lol), but that's before even factoring in that Hunter did his in 13 games vs 12 for T-Mac because Arizona didn't make a bowl game. It's also completely ignoring the team around each player.  If you think Hunter having the 8th place finisher in the Heisman voting at QB isn't going to result in helping his top WRs stats, then you're sticking your head in the sand to purposefully not see it. Hunter's QB had 353 completions for 4,134 yards and 37 TDs vs T-Mac's QB who had 260 completions for 2,958 yards and 18 TDs. But sure, let's rank NFL prospects by their stats and say the guy with more catches and TDs is the better prospect.  So on that note, I now change my mind, T-Mac is no longer the best WR in the draft, it's Nick Nash who had 104 rec, 1,382 yards, and 16 TDs, all numbers better than Hunter's... because that's how this is done, right? As I've said before, if someone wants to like a player better than someone else that's totally fair, but come with real reasons, talk about their play, but to talk about things like stats as your reasoning, when you ignore the obvious and massive flaws in using those stats in that way, just makes you look dumb.
    • Nah you don't go out and put up the numbers he did without being able to run routes dude is a football junky so he works on his craft he isn’t THAT much more athletic than other players to just be able to go out and do whatever and succeed at that level 
×
×
  • Create New...