If the Ravens are moving on from Lamar should we knock on that door?

[SmokinwithWilly]

41 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

he is a mvp and in play for another one this season, in theory he was much cheaper draft capital wise then our current midget qb.  Hindsight is 20 20 for sure but holy hell Jackson is on a completely different stratosphere then young as far as ability

 

2 firsts for jackson pairing him with moore and another 2nd round pick is interesting to think about.

No disagreement from me there as far as ability goes. At the time, I believe the Ravens were asking for 3 1sts and 2nds (before the non exclusive), plus the guaranteed money to Lamar would have made it difficult to put weapons around him, which was the exact scenario he was pissed about in Baltimore. The thing is after the non exclusive, all they had to do was match the offer so it wasn't likely going to happen for that reason alone unless there was a poison pill in the contract. 

It was always about team building strategy with LJ. Wouldn't matter though because Fitts is definitely the wrong person for that job and we'd have a Ferrari QB cruising in the merge lane in this offense.

[SmokinwithWilly]

27 minutes ago, AceMan said:

Lol that sounds like the Huddle.

I remember wayyyyy back in 2009, you would have half the forum defending Jake Delhomme as a starter even after the 2009 opener against the Eagles and Cardinals meltdown.

The Huddle loves mediocre at best QBs. Huddle wants Underdog, not Superman.

We had Superman, but we broke up for 2 gloves.