Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Darnold had the 13th worst QB win in NFL history if we measured passer rating


ENC Pantherfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, AggieLean said:

That’s cool, and I agree with your first paragraph. I’m not down with the 2nd. My backup can’t be both inaccurate and have serious issues with processing what they’re seeing on the field. 

And, as long we’re being consistent with our labeling, I’m cool. If you’re going to call one inaccurate, and point to his numbers as proof, then we need to do the same with others that display those same %’s.

Jake Delhomme was 59.4% and Derek Anderson was 54.3%. I've read on these boards that both these guys and Darnold are more accurate than Cam. This doesn't compute.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

 

Still having a difficult time not insulting ppl with a differing opinion I see.

 

Not one person wants Sam back as our starter. But don't let that stop you from a good insult. 

I ignore you and now I get flooded with poo reactions. I have sympathy for you.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gerry Green said:

 

 

Still having a difficult time not insulting ppl with a differing opinion I see.

 

Not one person wants Sam back as our starter. But don't let that stop you from a good insult. 

Don't you get it? You are supposed to loathe Sam as much as he does.  If you do not hate Sam's guts, to him you are Sam's jock sniffing diehard fans. There's no in-between, just one extreme or the other. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Don't you get it? You are supposed to loathe Sam as much as he does.  If you do not hate Sam's guts, to him you are Sam's jock sniffing diehard fans. There's no in-between, just one extreme or the other. 

You're still stewing because I disagreed with your immediate reaction to one of the ten worst passer ratings in league history by blaming the receivers for not being open. Now who's the angry one?

Edited by frankw
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, frankw said:

You're still stewing because I disagreed with your immediate reaction to one of the ten worst passer ratings in league history by blaming the receivers for not being open. Now who's the angry one?

Your assumptions are incorrect.  Try again. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, X-Clown said:

Jake Delhomme was 59.4% and Derek Anderson was 54.3%. I've read on these boards that both these guys and Darnold are more accurate than Cam. This doesn't compute.

Jake Delhomme didn't really play in the present-day era.   Completion % averages and expectations for the QB have gone up because of the way the game is called now. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

I ignore you and now I get flooded with poo reactions. I have sympathy for you.

Look at it this way :

They value your opinion for the amount of poo you get.

If they didn't, they wouldn't give a s--t.

 

Kind of like if, for example, I say "I don't care what you say about this and that....yadda yadda yadda" and then poo your post when I don't agree with your opinion on yadda yadda yadda....That means that I actually do care.  Think About It GIF by Identity

Edited by glenwo2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

When was this said and by who?

It's been a thing that's been said for years on this board, mostly by people who never wanted Cam Newton on our team for whatever reason, not just in Cam's last season. Most recent guy I can think of who debated this was Catsfan69, but there have been other posters who aren't memorable over the last decade make the same claims.

Edited by X-Clown
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

Look at it this way :

They value your opinion for the amount of poo you get.

If they didn't, they wouldn't give a s--t.

 

Kind of like if, for example, I say "I don't care what you say about this and that....yadda yadda yadda" and then poo your post when I don't agree with your opinion on yadda yadda yadda....That means that I actually do care.  /cdn-cgi/mirage/b6cc59609b429d59b0b691caa850d7f0ab8f4d8040b169c31c378b70f8c1014a/1280/https://media2.giphy.com/media/d3mlE7uhX8KFgEmY/200.gif

These interactions are just for fun. Even when things get testy (butthead laugh) between people. But Gerry Green aka iamhubby1 does not practice what he preaches so don't fall for it. I laugh at him and wish him well.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Don't you get it? You are supposed to loathe Sam as much as he does.  If you do not hate Sam's guts, to him you are Sam's jock sniffing diehard fans. There's no in-between, just one extreme or the other. 

 

Yeah, but it's so much fun getting them all riled up. And it's so easy. Just say something positive and watch the fireworks. lol

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...