Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So which QB do we think will be available at #9?

NAS

By NAS,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Soul Rebel Experienced

Soul Rebel

Posted
Posted

I think everyone assumes CHI finds a dance partner to trade out of 1. I think the Bears set the comp too high and nobody moves into that slot. CHI isn't taking a QB, so Indy should be fine at 4 unless they are dead-set on "their guy". 

  • 1 - Chicago stays put and takes BPA (Anderson or Carter),
  • 2 - Houston takes Young
  • 3 - Arizona takes BPA (Anderson or Carter)
  • 4- Indy takes Levis 
  • 5 - Seattle likes to trade back and Fitts taps into his old team to jump Vegas for a QB

We take Stroud at 5, give up our 60th pick, 2023 4th and a 2024 3rd to move up to 5. Still have our 40th overall and our third rounder this year to add a couple of starters.  

To answer OPs question, I think the only QB that's available at 9 is Richardson.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mage Grand Master

Mage

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

 

Respect for him if he returns to Ohio State to win the national championship.  And if that is what he wants to do, he should 100% do it.

But I really really really hope he thinks it through.  You never know what can happen.  And while I do think since he plays QB, an injury wouldn't hurt him as much as it would others at another position (Tua still went top 5)... you never know.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted (edited)

Once AR15 and Levis go through the post season workout activities BOTH could also go before we pick.  They should impress people and there are a lot of teams looking to restart at QB.  If that does happen we will probably be forced to take BPA and wait another year if we don’t trade up.

I think we will trade up and everyone better hope we get the right guy.  It will be really expensive in term of assets.
 

 

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bear Hands Grand Master

Bear Hands

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, Soul Rebel said:

I think everyone assumes CHI finds a dance partner to trade out of 1. I think the Bears set the comp too high and nobody moves into that slot. CHI isn't taking a QB, so Indy should be fine at 4 unless they are dead-set on "their guy". 

  • 1 - Chicago stays put and takes BPA (Anderson or Carter),
  • 2 - Houston takes Young
  • 3 - Arizona takes BPA (Anderson or Carter)
  • 4- Indy takes Levis 
  • 5 - Seattle likes to trade back and Fitts taps into his old team to jump Vegas for a QB

We take Stroud at 5, give up our 60th pick, 2023 4th and a 2024 3rd to move up to 5. Still have our 40th overall and our third rounder this year to add a couple of starters.  

To answer OPs question, I think the only QB that's available at 9 is Richardson.

This is what I'm thinking as well.  

That scenario could even happen if Indy trades to 1.  I just don't see anyone between us and SEA being THAT aggressive for a QB.  Raiders seem to be targeting vets, ATL has Ridder and could be a Carr candidate, SEA and DET may stand pat.  And it would be a fortune for anyone to move that high further down than us.  

The first 4 could shuffled around but still think it could be Anderson, Carter, Levis & Young in any particular order.  

What it all comes back to is this Young, Stroud, Levis debate for the teams.  The scenario operates under the assumption Indy and/or HOU will favor Levis over Stroud.  But if we really want to secure a guy, if and Chicago doesn't move, I think we may have to trade with Arizona and not rely on Indy screwing up.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bear Hands Grand Master

Bear Hands

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, Mage said:

Respect for him if he returns to Ohio State to win the national championship.  And if that is what he wants to do, he should 100% do it.

But I really really really hope he thinks it through.  You never know what can happen.  And while I do think since he plays QB, an injury wouldn't hurt him as much as it would others at another position (Tua still went top 5)... you never know.  

That would be insane. 

If he doesn't go for the draft, wonder if it makes Cameron Ward declare.  With the amount of guy returning, that could assure a guy like Ward to be QB3 or 4 off the board.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By frankw · Posted

      It amuses me how Goff's name the last few years is often used to compare to subpar or underperforming QB's. Now on the surface I get it. But when you look at his numbers he's been the same QB all along. He's improved his completion % but even with the Rams he averaged 63.4. And that Super Bowl he played in they should have won honestly. If we can get a QB as good as Goff I'll be pretty damn pleased.
    • kungfoodude
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      And it remains to be seen if Goff has that ability or not. Plenty of very good QB's like Goff were not able to get over those playoff humps. Matt Ryan, Kirk Cousins, etc. You can still be an upper tier QB and never get over that hurdle. McVay just thought(and hasn't been wrong yet) Goff was never going to be that guy.
    • kungfoodude
      We finally get to see Brooks this week

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      You literally simply have to think logically for either of those guys. Smith is locked up on a deal for 2025, so we would have to trade for him or he gets cut. Neither of those scenarios are likely in the first place.  Wilson will be 37 in 2025. Why on earth would he have any interest in a situation that is far worse than he was given in Denver and wasn't able to win there? He's a guy that can drop into any ready to win franchise in the NFL and immediately elevate their chances of winning(provided they already have QB issues).  Frankly, that is either speculation that even David Newton should be embarrassed by or it shows how disconnected with reality some people in our organization are.   I do agree with him on getting a veteran QB, however. That's our best chance to keep developing our talent.
×
×
  • Create New...