Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Post your 2023 Off-season Predictions!


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Carolina Cajun said:

Im not saying its what I would want, its what I think will happen.  Tepper is a lot of things, but tepper IS patient as seen by sticking with ron and Rhule a year longer than he should have, that tells me what he saw from Wilks will be the kind of stability that he's willing to roll with.  To add to that statement, remember he was open to the signing of Eric Reid who people had issues with because of his support for kaepernick, Im guessing he'd be in same boat in regards to supporting a minority candidate.

I think Darnold is a guy that will be viewed as a bridge and richardson will be our pick because he possesses all the traits needed to be an elite QB and I have a feeling that during the combine a few teams (us being one) will fall in love with him, and part of one being us will be because I think we hire Brian Johnson who has history with him.  

Macadoo fits with what I said about wilks and stability, With the instability lately, I think Tepper wants someone to just stop the bleeding and I do think Wilks has some faith in him atleast in some capacity.

Everything else seems like things that probably could happen.
 

Again, not exactly the direction I would go, its just the direction that I think we will go.

I sincerely hope you are wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

If you think we can't manipulate the cap enough to extend a center and sign a backup QB to a cheap one year deal, I really don't know what to tell you....  Burns "restructured" probably should have been extended (which can you backload if needed), but I think you are getting a little picky over a pretty calm logical post.  Your main concern was "with what money?"  which can easily be worked out.  Fitt already said he is interested in extending Bozeman which was the only possible pricey thing mentioned (depending on how you work the contract is might be relatively cheap this year as well).  

I’m not saying that, I’m saying we can’t manipulate the cap enough to keep Shaq, Resign Bozeman, Resign Darnold and Extend Brian Burns. Not “Some Center and Sam Darnold”. 
 

That “Center” has a market value of 15-17 million per season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, grimesgoat said:
  • Wilks hired as HC.
  • Reich hired as OC.
  • Bozeman resigned.  Darnold given 1 year deal.
  • Burns extended.
  • DJ restructured. 
  • Shaq kept.
  • Levis drafted at 9.
  • TE and Edge in 2nd.
  • RB in 3rd.
  • LB and S in 4th.
  • OL in 5th.

I like, and could expect, everything here except QB at 9. We can get a good one later. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

We're taking Michael Mayer from Notre Dame at #9.

We'll pick up a QB late in the draft after snagging a DE in second round and a nickelback in the 3rd.

We'll take Wilks as HC with Reich as OC. Holcomb stays at DC while we try to get Luke in as LB Coach or at least as a consultant.

We'll get Burns the extended, solid contract while renegotiating with Shaq and DJ Moore for better long term deals.

Bozeman will be re-signed for three years and will become a fixture of the team.

Moton may get restructured.

I think we move into the offseason with Corral as our QB of choice with Darnold on staff as the bridge. We may take a flyer on a FA QB or a trade if something shakes out. 

Too early for the ND TE at #9. I like this plan if can get him a little later. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HC: Johnson or McDaniel

QB Room: Young, Corral, and another TBC (Keenum?)

Trades: Burns, Moore, and our 2024 1st to CHI for #1

Draft: Young and Johnston in the 1st, TE in the 2nd, BPA rest of draft

FA: Gesicki on the other side of the rookie TE, Foreman, Bozeman

I actually think Sam goes elsewhere for 1-2 years similar to Trubisky going to Buffalo...probably a West Coast team like Seattle, SF, or Arizona. He probably gets a few starts and looks good enough to convince another non-QB focused team like TEN to be the starter after they move on from Tannehill. He's probably a poor man's Tannehill anyway.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Cdparr7 said:

I’m not saying that, I’m saying we can’t manipulate the cap enough to keep Shaq, Resign Bozeman, Resign Darnold and Extend Brian Burns. Not “Some Center and Sam Darnold”. 
 

That “Center” has a market value of 15-17 million per season.

10 to 12 mil

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, falconlynx said:

Too early for the ND TE at #9. I like this plan if can get him a little later. 

Nope. Take him there, don't eff around and miss him. We need a receiving TE more than just about anything else here. The lack of a good tight end has left the middle of the field to the defenders and is one of the main reasons DJ, TMJ and Laviska can rarely get open. We can't stress the seams enough. 

In the past, we could rely on CMC to do that work some, but those days are gone.

The only other potential spot I'd draft is DE at #9 but only if one of the two best somehow falls to us. 

 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Retain Wilks as HC.

Get the best OC available.

Sign Darnold to a cheap two year contract.

Start Corral at QB if he's ready. If not start Darnold until he is.

QB's Corral, Darnold and  one that is drafted in 2nd or 3rd rd.

Take best player available at # 9 in the draft.

Restructure contracts to free up money.

Resign Bozeman, Foreman, Burns to team friendly contracts..

Resod  the football field with real grass

Win the NFC South Division with a 9-8 record.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Cdparr7 said:

“Bozeman resigned, Sam Resigned, Shaq Kept, Burns restructured”

Tell me you don’t know football without telling me you don’t know football.

We have about 1 million in cap space. League may go up 5 million this year to put us at 6. What exactly are you going to restructure with Shaq and DJ? How are you going to restructure Burns on his 5th year option? He is going to want market value around 20 million per year. Which puts us at -14 million. Bozeman’s market value is 15-17 million per year which puts us at -30 million. Need 10 for draft picks which puts us at -40 million. And Sam will be around 5 million per year which puts us at -45 million without signing anyone else.

Just to close the loop on this - Signing Bozeman for a 3 year, 36m contract may look something like this...

Salary Bonus Cap hit
1 4 5
11 4 15
12 4 16

He gets 12 million up front and his salary in year 1 is 1m.  He earns 13 million in year 1.  His bonus is spread over the term of the contract.  Salary in years 2 and 3 are unguaranteed, so he can be cut with significant cap savings if something goes wrong.  Dead cap hit in year 2 is 8m.  Dead cap hit in year 3 is 4m.

Burns is due to make 17m next year.  A restructure/extension could be 5/125 with a signing bonus of 30m.  It could look like this...

Salary Bonus Cap hit
2 6 8
22 6 28
22 6 28
24 6 30
25 6 31
95 30 125

Burns earns 32m in 2023 instead of 17m, but the cap hit goes from 17m to 8m.  We save 9m on 2023 cap.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, KatsAzz said:

Retain Wilks as HC.

Get the best OC available.

Sign Darnold to a cheap two year contract.

Start Corral at QB if he's ready. If not start Darnold until he is.

QB's Corral, Darnold and  one that is drafted in 2nd or 3rd rd.

Take best player available at # 9 in the draft.

Restructure contracts to free up money.

Resign Bozeman, Foreman, Burns to team friendly contracts..

Resod  the football field with real grass

Win the NFC South Division with a 9-8 record.

Something, something....Mediocrity...Something... (just trying to do an impression of the usual suspects' replies to this.  Don't mind me)

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

Nope. Take him there, don't eff around and miss him. We need a receiving TE more than just about anything else here. The lack of a good tight end has left the middle of the field to the defenders and is one of the main reasons DJ, TMJ and Laviska can rarely get open. We can't stress the seams enough. 

In the past, we could rely on CMC to do that work some, but those days are gone.

The only other potential spot I'd draft is DE at #9 but only if one of the two best somehow falls to us. 

 

No we dont...lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • KC has a very good defense this year. It is 5th overall. Yes, still worse than last year, but their offense is considerably worse. Their passing D may be their "weakness" but they still allow fewer than 20 ppg. BY completed several deep passes yesterday, and he was able to threaten downfield in ways he didn't seem capable of before the benching. I'm not necessarily worried about his ability to connect deep anymore. What to me was impressive was that he did all this without a run game. We used the pass to set up what little running success we had. Wild.
    • Solid and fair assessment.   I will say, one of the big things I noticed yesterday was that he wasn't shy to step up into the pocket in the face of pressure.  He's trusting the IOL.  And they took care of Chris Jones yesterday.  We had clean pockets but also good success rate vs. pressure which just hasn't been the case with Bryce.   If he has more confidence the OL gets it done and he can navigate and step up for throws, that's huge.  It's one of the biggest things that's held him back.  He was previously bailing quickly and just too easily throwing away or making dead plays.     He was finding his 2nd to 3rd reads within structure/without bailing in the pocket.  That was nice to see, as much concern I have with him.  And the overall limitations will always be there. Time to back it up this week against the Bucs.  
    • Suddenly the Cowgirls look like our best chance for a win remaining. I think the Bucs are playing better than the Falcons of late.  Our lone game versus the dirty birds is in the ATL where we always struggle.  The Cardinals are marginally better than I thought they would be. We are not beating the Eagles, they are starting to roll. I'm saying two at most, next week at home versus the Bucs and the Cowgirls.
×
×
  • Create New...