No Jim Harbaugh - Carolina focusing attention elsewhere

[mav1234]

4 minutes ago, SZ James (banned) said:

I think the owner might just be stupid af, just going by past decisions idk

Also a strong possibility lol

[3838]

56 minutes ago, Cullenator said:

pull a Petrino

You mean quit on his team mid-season...then get a college cheerleader pregnant?

[PanthersATL]

if it's true that Harbaugh wanted 20m/year, a new GM, and full control?   I'm fine with Tepper walking away from that.

Wilks has proven he can coach this team and the players will work hard for him.  Other than not going for it on 4th and inches, fans really don't have much to honestly complain about what Wilks has been able to accomplish in the short tenure he's been in the role

 

[mrcompletely11]

8 minutes ago, PanthersATL said:

if it's true that Harbaugh wanted 20m/year, a new GM, and full control?   I'm fine with Tepper walking away from that.

Wilks has proven he can coach this team and the players will work hard for him.  Other than not going for it on 4th and inches, fans really don't have much to honestly complain about what Wilks has been able to accomplish in the short tenure he's been in the role

 

Being a leader and getting guys to play hard for him and scheming for another nfl team are 2 completely different things. I respect the gravitas he brings and he would bring us back to respectability but we have to do better.   And it’s not the asst coaches it’s his entire old school mindset.   We have already done it that way 2x now.   It’s not that the style doesn’t work it just doesn’t work enough.   

[The Lobo]

14 minutes ago, PanthersATL said:

if it's true that Harbaugh wanted 20m/year, a new GM, and full control?   I'm fine with Tepper walking away from that.

Wilks has proven he can coach this team and the players will work hard for him.  Other than not going for it on 4th and inches, fans really don't have much to honestly complain about what Wilks has been able to accomplish in the short tenure he's been in the role

 

We don’t know what all was being discussed. We don’t even know 100% if anything is accurate at this point. 

[Mr. Scot]

1 minute ago, The Lobo said:

We don’t know what all was being discussed. We don’t even know 100% if anything is accurate at this point. 

I don't know if those specifics are true, but It wouldn't shock me if Denver ownership was trying to make a big splash (same as Tepper did with his first hire).

I'd add that while we don't know what his desires/demands are, based on his general personality and what happened in Minnesota last year, it's not hard to figure that they're probably...substantial.

[Brooklyn 3.0]

Shocking! Harbaugh chooses money and mountains over a cute little upstart team in a boring transient banking city.

[PantherKyle]

21 minutes ago, PanthersATL said:

if it's true that Harbaugh wanted 20m/year, a new GM, and full control?   I'm fine with Tepper walking away from that.

Wilks has proven he can coach this team and the players will work hard for him.  Other than not going for it on 4th and inches, fans really don't have much to honestly complain about what Wilks has been able to accomplish in the short tenure he's been in the role

 

How about not beating a team with a winning record and going 5-6? He’s not the long term answer. 

[mrcompletely11]

1 minute ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Shocking! Harbaugh chooses money and mountains over a cute little upstart team in a boring transient banking city.

What?

[The Lobo]

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't know if those specifics are true, but It wouldn't shock me if Denver ownership was trying to make a big splash (same as Tepper did with his first hire).

I'd add that while we don't know what his desires/demands are, based on his general personality and what happened in Minnesota last year, it's not hard to figure that they're probably...substantial.

I mean Harbaugh is a big splash Rhule is not. 

[Brooklyn 3.0]

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

What?

What did you not understand?

[mrcompletely11]

4 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

What did you not understand?

That’s not what he chose.   

[Brooklyn 3.0]

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

That’s not what he chose.   

I meant "chooses" in the "if" way, not in the it's happened way.

[mrcompletely11]

1 minute ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

I meant "chooses" in the "if" way, not in the it's happened way.

He is interested in us we are not in him.  You have it backwards