Jim Harbaugh has convo with David Tepper

[ForJimmy]

1 hour ago, Shotgun said:

Where does he rank in TDs? He's a very good WR but I wouldn't rank him top 10 in the league at his position. 9th in yardage over the last 5 years is impressive though.

Give him a real QB and his TDs will increase. In the past Sam struggled to make reads in the red zone and we would just run the ball.

[t96]

54 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I didn't. I just put in context what I was quoting (as opposed to your entire post).

Now, if you want to say that Moore is a better #2 receiver than a #1, you're not the first or the only person to make that argument. And I'd agree there could be some validity to it.

It's kinda hard to say for sure though given that he's about the only threat anybody takes seriously at that spot. Marshall has potential but it's still just that so far.

Yes you did misquote me. Your quote of my post said “average WR” my post said “average 1WR.” Big difference. And I’m not making an argument that he’s a #2 at all so I don’t know what you’re talking about. Gotta lay off the bottle my man

[Proudiddy]

For those of us who haven't been following along page by page, has there been anything else since he told that Charlotte-based media source that he prolly will be back at Michigan next season?

[TLGPanthersFan]

5 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

For those of us who haven't been following along page by page, has there been anything else since he told that Charlotte-based media source that he prolly will be back at Michigan next season?

Been looking and I haven’t seen anything else. Personally, gonna just put a pin in it for now.

[Carl Spackler]

2 hours ago, Shotgun said:

Where does he rank in TDs? He's a very good WR but I wouldn't rank him top 10 in the league at his position. 9th in yardage over the last 5 years is impressive though.

Where do his QBs rank in TDs?

[Shotgun]

3 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

Where do his QBs rank in TDs?

I don't know, where did they rank in yardage?

[Mr. Scot]

39 minutes ago, t96 said:

Yes you did misquote me. Your quote of my post said “average WR” my post said “average 1WR.” Big difference. And I’m not making an argument that he’s a #2 at all so I don’t know what you’re talking about. Gotta lay off the bottle my man

No bottle in the house.

Just paxlovid for Lady Cowboy Fan.

(I'm still negative so far)

[Mr. Scot]

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

I think that Harbaugh would be a smart move...at least until it's not. I think that you at least have to try, and it seems as though Tepper has. I'm skeptical Jimbo is coming here though (or anywhere in the league). On to Steichen and Johnson and whoever else at the appointed times.

Nothing is a smart move unless it works out, of course.

But let's say you take Harbaugh, and in doing so bypass a guy like Shane Steichen.

Harbaugh has the kind of decent four or five year stint that many people here are talking about, then leaves because that's his shelf life. Maybe that includes a championship. Maybe it doesn't.

Meanwhile, Steichen goes on to coach for ten or more years somewhere else, maybe picking up a championship or two along the way or perhaps even just coaching his team to be a perennial contender.

In that case, how smart a move was it, really?

I know some people are okay with short, successful periods. I'm not.

I prefer someone who's in for the long haul.

[ForJimmy]

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Nothing is a smart move unless it works out, of course.

But let's say you take Harbaugh, and in doing so bypass a guy like Shane Steichen.

Harbaugh has the kind of decent four or five year stint that many people here are talking about, then leaves because that's his shelf life. Maybe that includes a championship. Maybe it doesn't.

Meanwhile, Steichen goes on to coach for ten or more years somewhere else, maybe picking up a championship or two along the way or perhaps even just coaching his team to be a perennial contender.

In that case, how smart a move was it, really?

I know some people are okay with short, successful periods. I'm not.

I prefer someone who's in for the long haul.

I don’t get the 5 year comments about Harbaugh. He was fired from the Niners, he didn’t just walk away and decide to coach at Michigan. His career was all upward moves until then. QB coach in the NFL, HC for smaller school in San Diego, HC for major conference school at Stanford, and HC in the NFL Niners. He was fired and took another big college job where he has been the past 7-8 years. He wants back in the NFL where he belongs.

Hell Doug Pederson was fired from the Eagles after only 5 years. Is anyone worried about him being a short term coach?

[mav1234]

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

Give him a real QB and his TDs will increase. In the past Sam struggled to make reads in the red zone and we would just run the ball.

If he'd kept at the pace he has with Sam these last few games he'd have 14 TDs on the year. That isn't bad.

[Stuart Smith]

On 1/3/2023 at 8:39 PM, CPF4LIFE said:

Gotta wonder if getting a QB would be a deal breaker in any of this. I cant see any coach wanting to attach themselves to one of the current guys on the roster.

If he is as great as everyone thinks he could make Darnold a top 15 quarterback and build the roster. 

[mrcompletely11]

26 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Nothing is a smart move unless it works out, of course.

But let's say you take Harbaugh, and in doing so bypass a guy like Shane Steichen.

Harbaugh has the kind of decent four or five year stint that many people here are talking about, then leaves because that's his shelf life. Maybe that includes a championship. Maybe it doesn't.

Meanwhile, Steichen goes on to coach for ten or more years somewhere else, maybe picking up a championship or two along the way or perhaps even just coaching his team to be a perennial contender.

In that case, how smart a move was it, really?

I know some people are okay with short, successful periods. I'm not.

I prefer someone who's in for the long haul.

Why is 5 years his shelf life?

[therealmjl]

28 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I don’t get the 5 year comments about Harbaugh. He was fired from the Niners, he didn’t just walk away and decide to coach at Michigan. His career was all upward moves until then. QB coach in the NFL, HC for smaller school in San Diego, HC for major conference school at Stanford, and HC in the NFL Niners. He was fired and took another big college job where he has been the past 7-8 years. He wants back in the NFL where he belongs.

Hell Doug Pederson was fired from the Eagles after only 5 years. Is anyone worried about him being a short term coach?

Nvm

Edited January 5, 2023 by therealmjl

[Jon Snow]

48 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Nothing is a smart move unless it works out, of course.

But let's say you take Harbaugh, and in doing so bypass a guy like Shane Steichen.

Harbaugh has the kind of decent four or five year stint that many people here are talking about, then leaves because that's his shelf life. Maybe that includes a championship. Maybe it doesn't.

Meanwhile, Steichen goes on to coach for ten or more years somewhere else, maybe picking up a championship or two along the way or perhaps even just coaching his team to be a perennial contender.

In that case, how smart a move was it, really?

I know some people are okay with short, successful periods. I'm not.

I prefer someone who's in for the long haul.

It would be nice to find our version of Mike Tomlin or a nicer version of that evil corpse up in Boston.

Edited January 5, 2023 by Jon Snow