Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

MNF: Bills vs. Bengals *game suspended* - prayers for Damar Hamlin


LinvilleGorge
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, mav1234 said:

Some of them may have been expecting positive news about the player, or may have just been waiting for lots to empty etc... don't judge the fans in this circumstance.

Yeah but it's still a bad look 'cause we don't know that's why they're sitting and waiting.

I would like to think that is why they're doing so but....it just looks bad when other fans are leaving and they're just still sitting there not moving an inch until the PA tells them it's over. 

It just rubs me the wrong way in a situation like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Goodell. The NFL's policy on these situations has already been posted. It's his call.

Okay cool.  Who is relaying him the info?  How reliable is the info?  Who does goddell call to cancel the game? 

 

There are just so many variables its crazy.  Like I said I doubt the nfl has a protocol on how this works.  I would love to bash the nfl on any and everything but all things considered taking control of this situation 30ish minutes after the fact is pretty damn good

 

Now if you want to bash them for not having a plan in place if someone dies on the field then yeah thats a totally different argument but for tonight they did what they could

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Captroop said:

Nah this is peak Bayless. A scorching hot take, that will not become its own entity and bring even more attention to himself, his show, and big surprise his network which is Fox. Bayless is now apart of the incident. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

who makes the call?  I know your frustration but its simply not that easy when you are dealing with an organization as big as the nfl

Goodell makes the call. You could see the players faces. This wasn't just concern. These guys were visibly shaken, some probably traumatized. It's too much to ask of any of them to go back out and play a game. Making them warm up. C'mon. A teammate, a colleague, a friend could have just died on the field for all they know and they can't decide if they need to continue in under 60 seconds? Gotta be better than that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, hepcat said:

It’s f*cking horrible. He might be alive but he was given CPR for almost 10 minutes meaning that’s 10 minutes his brain and other organs might have not been getting oxygen. Being intubated means a host of other pathogens can get into your body in an already weakened state. It’s so awful and am praying for that man and his family. This is just terrible. 

Hopefully, he received the CPR quick enough and for long enough to keep his O2 levels up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, glenwo2 said:

Yeah but it's still a bad look 'cause we don't know that's why they're sitting and waiting.

I would like to think that is why they're doing so but....it just looks bad when other fans are leaving and they're just still sitting there not moving an inch until the PA tells them it's over. 

It just rubs me the wrong way in a situation like this.

This kind of thing was tragic and a shock to everyone.  People everywhere are stunned. Not going to say how anyone should have reacted.

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

only because the players/coaches refused to play. or that's how the NFL has now made this look. which is absolutely pathetic.

They weren’t going to let them continue play. I’m sure they called down to let the coaches know the protocol (if there even is a protocol for this). It just took a minute to go down the latter to let the broadcasters know the procedure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ladypanther said:

This kind of thing was tragic and a shock to everyone.  People everywhere are stunned. Not going to say how anyone should have reacted.

You're probably right.

Still just saying how I see it.

No one has to agree with it nor am I telling people here that my viewpoint is right. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

Yeah but it's still a bad look 'cause we don't know that's why they're sitting and waiting.

I would like to think that is why they're doing so but....it just looks bad when other fans are leaving and they're just still sitting there not moving an inch until the PA tells them it's over. 

It just rubs me the wrong way in a situation like this.

I think we are all in a bit of shock and reacted strongly in various ways. But the fans in the stadium, even more than us, are likely in an extreme state of confusion and shock given what they saw live.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ForJimmy said:

They weren’t going to let them continue play. I’m sure they called down to let the coaches know the protocol (if there even is a protocol for this). It just took a minute to go down the latter to let the broadcasters know the procedure. 

I mean the coaches actually did have to intervene to prevent the officials from warming the players up and returning to the field.

Then we had to wait how long for anything close to an official announcement?

Really fuged up response IMO.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...