Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marc Ryan: Wilks Unlikely To Be Next HC. Tepper has Affinity for Demeco Ryans.


Proudiddy
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

If we let Wilks go just to hire Ryans, I will be done.  What's the point?  We need an OC.  Period.  Another DC will just bring more of the same problems we have always had with DCs.  I like both Wilks and Ryans, and in any other year 10 years ago, I'd be ecstatic for either, but I do NOT want another DC.

  • Pie 7
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

 

If we let Wilks go just to hire Ryans, I will be done.  What's the point?  We need an OC.  Period.  Another DC will just bring more of the same problems we have always had with DCs.  I like both Wilks and Ryans, and in any other year 10 years ago, I'd be ecstatic for either, but I do NOT want another DC.

Yeah, you'll be done. LOL

It's all about the ties and relationships with young offensive minds. Scot may be able to help us with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, that's the other problem that I'm having with this: all DCs aren't the same. Just because Ryan's is a DC doesn't mean that he's anything like Wilks. 

I've seen way too much generalizing in the last few months. 1+1 in does in fact equal two, but 1 + 1½ or 1+1⅛ does not equal two. Get a grip!

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Yep, that's the other problem that I'm having with this: all DCs aren't the same. Just because Ryan's is a DC doesn't mean that he's anything like Wilks. 

I've seen way too much generalizing in the last few months. 1+1 in does in fact equal two, but 1 + 1½ or 1+1⅛ does not equal two. Get a grip!

MOST DCs seem cut from the same cloth. I think they see the offense as losing them the game more often than not.  Not controlling the ball long enough, or having a turnover, or whatever, that makes their defense have trouble. They want the game low-scoring, so their defense has a chance to control the tempo of the game.  That's an outdated way of playing IMO.  Can it work? To an extent, yes, and especially with the right QB. But most of us want to go out and win games, bury teams entirely, and take risks on offense to put ourselves in position to win, not just to avoid losing.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC
    • https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC
    • If there's a prospect who looks strong on the field but has the question marks, makes sense to bring them in and see if they are indeed a nutjob or not.  Especially if they couldn't get a good sense in limited time to meet him at the combine.  Randy Mueller has talked about it before -- many GMs don't just use these top-30s to validate the guys they already love.  Although we seem to do that and kind of show our cards a lot lol.   But to the point, if they love tape, have met enough coaches/teammates and talked to them at the bowls/workouts, many teams don't need to wine and dine and get to know them.   There's certain guys who get to know regional scouts, GMs and position coaches starting mid-college season last year.    On the flipside, there's the wildcards who aren't privy to developing relationships with the pro-community while in school, have bad reps, and teams need to dig a bit further into it.  A top-30 becomes a good measuring stick for those teams think could be a stellar fit but are unsure on who the guy actually is - which matters a ton at the end of the day.  Organizational fit has so much more weight than let on and is why these drafts after the first few picks get so all over the map.  
×
×
  • Create New...