Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ben Johnson vs Shane Steichen


Recommended Posts

Ben Johnson has impressed me the most this year. Really creative looks and has made Goff look serviceable. Give him a guy like Richardson, Stroud, or Levis and i think he would have success.

Also, hes a Carolina native. Born in Charleston and went to UNC. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you had to put a gun to my head I would chose Johnson because yeah he had some weapons but Shane is working with a fully loaded team on offense.

Problem is I have come to realize that just because they are a hot name offensive doesn’t mean crap when they can’t be a leader. 
 

Pick the right guy not the hot name just because.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think either one would be a good choice. Johnson looks more creative to me, but Steichen is better at picking a defense apart and exploiting weaknesses. With the players we currently have on offense, I lean to Steichen to create an offense built around player strengths instead of relying on needing to be creative constantly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They reached for Pickett, so they are not immune to it.  I could see that as well.  I just think the Colts are flying under the radar and they have been too quiet concerning their QB situation--of course, they could think Jones is their guy (they had a good one named Jones a long time ago) but I think they are done with the Richardson experiment.   Even if I believed in Jones, I would still draft a QB--I also read one mock that said the Jets would take Sanders if he falls to 7---I disagree, but I was once wrong and it still bothers me.
    • I just switched to prime video with fanduel south. Will I be able to watch the Canes playoff games still?
    • I mean, you can use that "logic," but the problem is that most practice squad players, backups or average guys don't put the play on film that Wharton did when given their opportunities.  Perhaps you'll end up right, but I don't think that just because a guy has been in a rotation makes him inherently less productive because he gets more snaps. I will say that the KC fans I've seen on social media loved him, and considered him their second best DT,  regardless of his "rotational" status, and generally considered him a dawg, so I'm going to give him the benefit of doubt until he shows otherwise.
×
×
  • Create New...