Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What's your offer to Chicago?


BrisbanePanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

Nothing. I’m old enough to remember Vince Young scoring 5 TDs and setting a record for most all purpose yards in the Rose Bowl.  

Means Didly-poo. 

 

So does tripping ass first into the Playoffs, losing, keeping the same QBs, and keeping the coach who did "ok".

  • Pie 6
  • Flames 5
  • Poo 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really anything. I never liked trading up but it’s the way to go at this point. When we got cam, a losing team was deliberate.  The Panthers seem to be destined to be kings of the shitpile. Which means  no hope. If it can only consist of two firsts that’d be great -we have plenty of 2/3s to give them. 
 

this isn’t to say draft one just because but if everyone believes in one of them, do it.

Edited by onmyown
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Per the chart, it would be our 1st and 3rd staying at #8. Win this putrid division and drop to #19 and it becomes our 1st, 2nd, and another late rounder.

That's just per the chart. Some of these trades for high picks to take QBs in recent years might mean the chart gets tossed out the window. It might depend on how far they're willing to slide down the board. At #8 they'd still be in prime position to land an impact player. They might not even be looking to slide all the way back to #19 unless it's a huge offer.

For reference, the Niners traded three 1sts and a 3rd to move from #12 to #3 to take Trey Lance. Per the chart, it should've only taken their 1st, 3rd, and maybe a late rounder to sweeten the pot. But when the pick is gonna be a QB and the phones are ringing just throw the chart out the window. The Dolphins still have another 1st coming their way from that trade this year. Meanwhile, Trey Lance has hardly played. He's only thrown 102 passes in the NFL.

  • Pie 2
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Per the chart, it would be our 1st and 3rd staying at #8. Win this putrid division and drop to #19 and it becomes our 1st, 2nd, and another late rounder.

That's just per the chart. Some of these trades for high picks to take QBs in recent years might mean the chart gets tossed out the window. It might depend on how far they're willing to slide down the board. At #8 they'd still be in prime position to land an impact player. They might not even be looking to slide all the way back to #19 unless it's a huge offer.

For reference, the Niners traded three 1sts and a 3rd to love from #12 to #3 to take Trey Lance. Per the chart, it should've only taken their 1st, 3rd, and maybe a late rounder to sweeten the pot. But when the pick is gonna be a QB and the phones are ringing just throw the chart out the window.

 

Yea that chart doesn’t mean much for top picks. Charts do not factor in competition, only worth.

It’s hard to tell but I think 8, next year’s first and this years second is minimum. Add in either this years’ third or next years second and it becomes more realistic.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, onmyown said:

Yea that chart doesn’t mean much for top picks. Charts do not factor in competition, only worth.

It’s hard to tell but I think 8, next year’s first and this years second is minimum. Add in either this years’ third or next years second and it becomes more realistic.

Im not opposed to it, but you gotta be certain. He's gotta blow you away in the interviews and whiteboard work. That's the crucial part of the equation that us fans get virtually no insight into.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trying to help those 3 folks who hate this move.    In 2025 2.75 million is basically the new "vet" minimum.    They still need #3 RB and returner, draft could/should be the lane for that.    There's no downside to this move, they could cut with little effect and replace with your chosen rookie.   
    • Is it though? Even looking at just this past year, DK played 3 more games and had 81 more yards than Higgins had, but he also did it on less catches, with DK averaging 15 yards per catch and Higgins with 12.5. Yes, Higgins had 10 TDs to DK's 5, but I'd say that was far less about the WRs than the QBs, seeing as Burrow had 43 TDs (and only 9 INTs) to Geno's 21 TDs (and 15 INTs).  Swap the two of them last year and DK puts up better stats with Burrow as his QB than Higgins did, no doubt about it in my mind. DK has also only missed 3 games in his career, Higgins has missed 5 in each of the last 2 seasons. People here complain about our WR speed (and it's many people's biggest issue with T-Mac in the draft), but Higgins ran a 4.59 40 and DK ran a 4.33. DK has only played one more season than Higgins but he has 1,730 yards and 14 TDs more than Higgins, despite playing with the ghost of Russell Wilson and Geno Smith, while Higgins has had Burrow. To me, there is no debate, DK is a significantly better WR than Higgins.  Give him Burrow as his QB during his career and his numbers would dwarf what Higgins has put up.
    • Thanks to @CarolinaLivin for the Juan-like work!  
×
×
  • Create New...