Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jason LaCanfora: Panthers potential landing spot for Raiders QB Derek Carr


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Did you see my post?

 

He's not in the building. Not at meetings, practice or lifting sessions. He's cleaned out his locker.

At any job in the world if you go home after a demotion and don't return to work that's quitting. 

It was  a mutual decision between the two sides to minimize disruption in the locker room. He didn't quit. It is okay to be wrong and move on. Saying the same thing over and over doesn't make it true.

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Did you see my post?

 

He's not in the building. Not at meetings, practice or lifting sessions. He's cleaned out his locker.

At any job in the world if you go home after a demotion and don't return to work that's quitting. 

  Please explain why a person who has BEEN fired because of the chance of an injury would participate in practice, lifting or anything that might result in injury at the team facility? 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Did you see my post?

 

He's not in the building. Not at meetings, practice or lifting sessions. He's cleaned out his locker.

At any job in the world if you go home after a demotion and don't return to work that's quitting. 

Yeah, because they are cutting him and they won't let him play.

Lol. So who quit on who?

What an exceptionally strange take on a very obvious situation. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Catsfan69 said:

If you go home and leave the building because you got benched that's quitting. 

 

He has left the team.

Where the hell are you getting this take from??  Is there any other journalist or source that agrees with this or are you just completing pulling it out of thin air??  Of course when it comes to QBs your takes have never been that good anyway so I guess it's par for the course...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC
    • https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC
    • If there's a prospect who looks strong on the field but has the question marks, makes sense to bring them in and see if they are indeed a nutjob or not.  Especially if they couldn't get a good sense in limited time to meet him at the combine.  Randy Mueller has talked about it before -- many GMs don't just use these top-30s to validate the guys they already love.  Although we seem to do that and kind of show our cards a lot lol.   But to the point, if they love tape, have met enough coaches/teammates and talked to them at the bowls/workouts, many teams don't need to wine and dine and get to know them.   There's certain guys who get to know regional scouts, GMs and position coaches starting mid-college season last year.    On the flipside, there's the wildcards who aren't privy to developing relationships with the pro-community while in school, have bad reps, and teams need to dig a bit further into it.  A top-30 becomes a good measuring stick for those teams think could be a stellar fit but are unsure on who the guy actually is - which matters a ton at the end of the day.  Organizational fit has so much more weight than let on and is why these drafts after the first few picks get so all over the map.  
×
×
  • Create New...