Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brock Purdy


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I said he looked terrible.  Absolutely terrible.  I didn't say he was a bust.  I was saying he look terrible.  Compare him to Purdy who has been with the team less than a year and look 1000% better than Lance.

oof

 

there are other examples of you showing your ass but I think you get the point

Edited by mrcompletely11
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Hmm what all rookies have played?  I know WIllis played one game, Pickett has played several but can't stay healthy, Howell hasn't played, Corral hasn't played, Ridder hasn't played but will this weekend....  Am I missing some others?

Skylar Thompson and Bailey Zappe are the only other two I can think of.  Skylar played a little when Tua and Teddy were injured but didn't look great (although he was one of those Preseason Superstars), but Zappe performed pretty well in his 2 starts.  Statistically, him and Purdy are remarkably close across the board on most stats and have played roughly the same number of snaps (210 for Purdy, 207 for Zappe).

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Brass judgement?  Purdy had almost as many completed passes in a row than Lance had the whole game.  Lance also had Samuel in the line-up.  

You and @mrcompletely11 make all these excuses why Lance looked so bad but discount Purdy's performance as JAG behind a great coach.  Why's that?

Are you just trying to go in a damn circle?  I gave several reason why Lance could have struggled vs Purdy in game 1.  He also may take longer to develop.  There are thousands of variables for trying to compare young QBs after their first few starts.  Teddy Bridgewater looked better than Peyton Manning, John Elway, and Troy Aikman in his first few starts.  Do you think Teddy was a better QB?

It is extremely brass and ignorant to call a QB a bust after 1 game.  What part of that can you not grasp?  When did I say Purdy is a "JAG"?  Are you just making things up?  I'm not saying Lance is better than Purdy, I am saying it is most definitely TBD at this point in their young careers.  Purdy could have that "it" factor and Lance could never figure it out.  There is no telling at this point...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, top dawg said:

But it's really not apples to apples. Purdy had substantially more practical experience than Lance. Lance is more physically gifted and had more perceptible traits, but he has a certain amount of rawness--more than most because of his collegiate career arc. Now with the injuries further stunting his development, Purdy may have passed him not only on the curve of development, but also the curve of expectations. Purdy has at least muddied the water. I wouldn't count out Lance just yet though. QBs develop at their own pace if given the opportunity. The problem, at least in my mind, is that NFL types are indoctrinated in the mindset that higher picks are always better and more deserving than the lower round projects. In addition to that line of thinking is that no one wants to be patient anymore. So there are the preconceived notions and a lack of patience, and unfortunately this leads to a lot of wasted talent missed opportunities. The guys farther down the totem pole have to work harder, be ready, and sometimes be lucky--including being drafted by the right team in the right situation--in order to succeed.

 

Fair enough.  What gets me is the double standard.  Lance gets all the he's developing love while Purdy gets it's only because he's playing in a good system.

Maybe it's both, maybe not.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

The whole point of this thread is wishful thinking. OP literally wanted it to happen and others resonate with his opinion. Again, wishful thinking, something that did not and will never happen. It's an issue that this board has for whatever reason. 

Wishful thinking is more about thinking something that you do that is not likely can affect your future positively. I think the OP was more just simply wishing based upon what's already happened. Purdy obviously is a 49er, and that's likely where he'll be at least for the next few years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ForJimmy said:

@mrcompletely11already quoted you saying it.  Just scroll up page 5....  Man it's getting bad....

again, this is the level of intelligence we are dealing with here, there are numerous other examples and he is just digging in

 

He literally called lance a bust after one game.   And he is ranting about us making excuses.  Its good for a laugh on friday morning

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Varking said:

I think if he were here in Carolina he wouldn’t be what he is now. We’ll see if he can keep this momentum. Five weeks is usually about where you can tell if a dude is getting it or not. 

You nailed it.  I personally think Kyle S is one of the better offensive minds in the game as well.  Looking at the NFC the 49ers are as good as anyone and maybe the best team 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is a wild statement it’s to late to save his season with six games left? That mountain of bad film as a rookie with trash coaching a weak azz line and dismal WRs. Guys that can’t catch on with other teams or guys traded to teams that are subpar at best. We put Bryce in a terrible situation to start his career does that matter to you or you feel he should’ve, as a rookie elevate this dumpster fire. If you’re giving him a fair assessment judge him off the last four games a good o-line decent WRs still not comparable to any other young QB WR room Hou (tank/nico..) Tua (Hill/Waddle) Caleb (Moore/Rome/Allen) let’s see what he can do with a decent structure around him for the next few weeks then let’s revisit how we’re going to grade or assess his performances.
    • As a bit of counterpoint, if he wanted to continue his professional career then handling it like a mature adult was the only option. Dude had been playing like absolute ass and needed to own it. It's great that he did but it's not like he didn't have a large amount of self interest in doing so. Not picking on Bryce specifically here, as this applies to any player or even anyone struggling early in their career. And he still has a long way to go, but signs are positive.
    • I agree he could still develop, but I think that could still be developed in practice. Just after a scary injury like that, I'm nervous to see him get reps in a live game situation when the best possible outcome is nothing more than worsening our draft selection. That said, I'm 100% not a doctor, so if he's clear to play, he wants to play, and there's no potential of aggravating this injury (which by all accounts it doesn't seem that is the case for this type of injury) then go for it, I guess.   But you hit the nail on the head. This draft class is really impressive. I can't remember the last time I was so impressed with a rookie that I'd actually prefer shutting him down. His game is so apparent that he doesn't need to prove anything at this point. Can't remember the last time that happened!
×
×
  • Create New...