Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jeremy Chinn...


electro's horse
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

I don't get why we don't blitz him off the edge more...the man is a heat-seeking missile.  His coverage on the other hand scares me.  Was hoping his *mis*usage (imo) was more of a Rhule/Snow thing but nothing seems to have changed with Chinn's role in the Wilks era.

We did in the 2nd half. We brought in Burris and dropped Hartsfield back. I counted about 8 snaps that Chinn was LB on the field. At one point we had Luvu, Smith, Chinn, and Shaq as our LBs. Luvu got a sack on that play. 

The 2nd half we made adjustments and the Seahawks didnt score a TD until the final 14 seconds of the game.

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 7
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First half they were high-low'ing him pretty effectively. Not sure how they were scheming to get him into those situations. 

Also I get that Lockett is a very good, shifty receiver but Chinn looked hesitant out there. 

Still made a big play in the fourth quarter, but they need to get back to what they were doing his rookie year. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

We did in the 2nd half. We brought in Burris and dropped Hartsfield back. I counted about 8 snaps that Chinn was LB on the field. At one point we had Luvu, Smith, Chinn, and Shaq as our LBs. Luvu got a sack on that play. 

The 2nd half we made adjustments and the Seahawks didnt score a TD until the final 14 seconds of the game.

This makes me feel better about keeping Wilks if that is what happens.  Rivera's lack of adjustments always drove me crazy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom lines to me are that a) we played well enough to beat the best team in the league and b) Bryce Young is growing into a bridge QB role (his ceiling) for us. As much as I don't want BY around after the season, it seems DC can still build the O with a game manager at QB for now. Best case scanario, we can build the D through the draft this year and take a QB we have conviction outside the 1st this or next draft. If BY keeps improving, we are going to win a couple more games this year.
    • Bryce has been a completely different QB since coming back. That started in Denver where it was obviously he was playing a lot more loose and willing to push the ball downfield  Bryce continues to build off of the previous weeks performance and that’s what you want to see Bryce has been making some real good anticipation throws. Reading defenses well. Pushing the ball downfield (7 throws of 20+ air yards yesterday. 8 if you want to include PI to Thielen). The deep ball accuracy has been there. Some of Young’s best throws yesterday were incompletions. Sideline balls to XL and Moore both should’ve been caught. RZ dot to Tremble should’ve been caught. And another RZ ball to Moore that Young gave him a chance at. Bryce is starting to execute Canales offense and yesterday Canales finally opened it up a bit. Canales was to blame for the 126 passing yards in Germany as he played a more conservative game.  The next bit I’m looking for his for Young to be a bit more decisive with running the ball. Start putting that on film and it’ll help open things up a tad
    • This KC team isn't the juggernaut it once was.  How many one score games have they won this season?  How many of those one score wins would probably have been loses if Mahomes wasn't the QB?  Their secondary is vulnerable and it was obvious today.  Grandpa Thielen was able to get open at will all game long. Bryce played well, but thinking this is the exact same KC defense Young was able to move the ball against as last year isn't going to compute.  Last year's KC defense was #2 overall.  They have regressed. I've said it before, Bryce can move the ball before the red zone, but once there, he struggles.  He is not a threat with his legs and the passing windows get much tighter.  He's not turning the ball over, so that is a great place to start and build upon.  I still question much better he can get.  Beyond a game manager?  I highly doubt it.
×
×
  • Create New...