Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Say what you want….


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, rayzor said:

i think for this year it's fine. i think even going forward it will still be good to have a team that can bully with the run the way we do. 

the problem is that we don't have much of a choice. we certainly don't have a QB that can help us out in a shootout so that's definitely going to have to be addressed, along with a pass catching TE or two.  i don't think we need a personality change as a team, tbh. i like the pounding culture. we just need to add to it, add the capability to kill through the air if needed. 

but i have to admit loving watch that seattle defense get wore out because we keep battering away. adding more of an air game to it can only thin out the defense more. i mean the way we're loading up at the line with big bodies, it's only a matter of time before defenses start stacking the box and shutting us down. we don't have much to spread the ball and them out. 

if wilkes can keep this aggressive nature going and building, i really don't care what our philosophy is otherwise. more than half the battle is getting players bought in to whatever mindset you are trying to instill. if it's aggressive, situationally aware, and disciplined (which this team seems to be), it will go along way in being successful.

i was big on getting some offensive brain to make us one of those flashy offenses that will pile on the points, but i'm really warming up to the idea of wiles being that guy. Just get him a better OC and QB and TE and i think we're set.

This to me is the key part here. In the 2022 NFL, we should be beyond one-dimensional smashmouth football...it should be punishing football where opponents are demoralized by the offense on the ground AND through the air, plus a lights-out, opportunistic D and special teams. We already had this in 2015. Again, that's why we need a QB that can impose his will on a defense to go along with a run game that threatens to. We should be able to exploit all their attacks, not just bullying on the ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/11/2022 at 10:43 PM, Shocker said:

if Darnold keeps playing mistake free football and moving this offense look out

 

On 12/11/2022 at 11:21 PM, Fright said:

If we can keep getting smart play out of Darnold, we could be a legit threat if we sneak in. 

Pardon the bump, fellas...

 

But may I point out that Sam had one throw at the start of the game(i believe) that was almost picked and made a poor decision in forcing a ball to Tremble who was covered in the endzone instead of running it in himself (he had wide-open space)?

It wasn't exactly mistake-free football from him.

He was fortunate he wasn't picked (That could've set the tone for the whole game right there) and we lost points on the latter. 

 

For those here saying we need a QB, yeah you damn right we need a QB.

 

Edited by glenwo2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm pretty sure this would be his first choice.

His love for the Panthers is clear, so yes.

My point is  that his success so far, and especially if we go 3-1 to finish, and he is an available black HC who became a coach of the ear candidate down the stretch.  If I had an opening I would sure put him on the invite list  (maybe not Arizona, lol!) for an interview.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, RenoCarolina said:

His love for the Panthers is clear, so yes.

My point is  that his success so far, and especially if we go 3-1 to finish, and he is an available black HC who became a coach of the ear candidate down the stretch.  If I had an opening I would sure put him on the invite list  (maybe not Arizona, lol!) for an interview.

I'd agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • i think i go in the opposite direction of most. my ideal retirement is living in some old downtown area in a flat above some shop or something.  life out in the country was just something i got real tired of. My kids actually miss some of living out there, which i understand. that was where they grew up for the most part. 40 acres with a 2.5 acre pond. it was beautiful, but also way too much (and too expensive) for me to keep up with. 
    • FLASHBACK: I remember back when ESPN was just starting--he was their anchor.  They used to show stuff like Rodeo and field hockey--I remember laughing when he went to a commercial mocking a cycling competition in Utah (or something similar--I made that up) and I laughed.  I told my dad, "We may have us a new anchor when we get back from commercial."  When they came back from commercial, Berman was looking very serious and he said, "Any comments by me do not reflect the views of ESPN....The men and women who cycle are dedicated athletes and we are honored to shine light on their sport." (Paraphrasing).  Dad laughed hysterically. My first memory of him--and that was like 1980.
    • Might not have a team without them. Although that probably applies to the Panthers, too.
×
×
  • Create New...