Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scott Fowler interview with Matt Rhule ‘fans sealed his fare’


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

Of course he starts off commenting about how he feels. "Don't worry Panthers fans out there, I'm not mad or bitter" Nobody asked him about his personal feelings. It's not like he got done wrong, he got 3 years and like 5 QB's. He's said the same BS in every interview, I wish someone would challenge his bs and push him off his prepared remarks 

It wouldn't hurt my feelings if we had no more rule posts.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheSpecialJuan said:

Cam Newton's past comments of Matt Rhule's Panthers sound awfully accurate now

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2022/12/01/panthers-cam-newton-matt-rhule-fire-comments/

“Being honest . . . I don’t think a lot of guys really bought into it. And when I say ‘guys,’ I’m not throwing nobody under the bus. I won’t do that. But buying in isn’t just verbally committing. Buying in is being the pig and not the chicken. If that makes sense, if you guys ever heard the story of the commitment level of the pig. The pig gave his life, the chicken just produced an egg, right?

“So, this is not for the headline to be a pig or a chicken. It’s just the commitment level. It’s the actions. Your level of commitment Wednesday through Saturday through Sunday. In-game adjustments. The attention to details. But when you see a locker room like that—I think it starts not only with the players, but it goes to the coaches. Not only the coaches, but the personnel. Not only the personnel, but the people in the top office. So, it’s a trickle effect.”

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • While we're talking a fresh prospect that I happen to be a fan of, might as well get on a soapbox: Point 1 - He is not undersized by any means, his length is far above the mean His wingspan is in like the 85th percentile. An interesting note - his wingspan is 5 inches over Khalil Mack, 2 inches over Will Anderson's.  Only 1/2 inch away from the no-production yet size hyped 6'5 267 Shemar Stewart's. For comp - Ez's is around 83", arm length 34".  For NFL comp, the mean for wingspan is 80" and arms 33.5" at for starting EDGE defenders.  So it's not just my isolated comparisons. Point 2 - He isn't just a flashy "pass rush specialist" His film (and testing) shows elite quickness, hand work, and ability to play with the heads of OTs that normal prospects don't grasp. (see my prior post) Testing wise, one of the fastest 3-cones and short shuttles for an edge in years.  Fastest this year for both -- and those two drills are the ones teams look at for pass rushers, usually very indicative of success.  His quickness is off the charts. He's a guy that played well, showed well to those casually watching and those film-studying.  Then he goes out and tests well to back it up.  Apparently interviews super well.  So, I think it's all about his capacity/potential as a run defender.  That's really what it comes down to.  Can he be a 3-down guy or is he a specialist?  I see a 3-downer, his run defense is better than given credit for. A breakdown Ez vs. the NFL mean Arm Length: 34" vs. 33.5" (over) Wingspan: 83" vs. 80" (over) 3-Cone: 6.94 sec vs. 7.23 (WELL over, 95 percentile) Short Shuttle: 4.19 vs. 4.424 (over) Height: 6'2 1/2 vs. 6'3 (slight under) People look at the height a smidge under 6'3 and take that without considering the rest.   I think with Ez, it all comes down to what teams think his run defense upside is.  All it takes is one team - if they think he can become more that a passing down guy, then he could go high.  But if guys like Nik Bonitto and Haason Reddick can turn into these all-arounders, I don't see why this kid can't either who has higher pedigree and better measurables. Now, I prefer Graham, Walker inside, Will Johnson, Barron, and some others over him, but once we're in this tier outside of the top guys, I find the argument way more compelling for Ez over a Mykel Williams or Shemar Stewart.    
    • Well if we’re bringing this guy with character issues in for a visit why not consider Mike Green at 8!? 
×
×
  • Create New...