Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Catcrave 4 QBs if panthers drop out of top 10


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, JVic said:

Not a single franchise changing QB in this year's draft.  Keep trying to win, best player available wherever you pick, as long as that player isn't a QB until way late in the draft.  

Great strategy, BPA unless its a QB,P, or K. Since you value the 3 positions alike. 

I just hope you let the front office know when a franchise changing QB is available and we are allowed to draft him.

I guess you knew Allen, Mahomes, Rodgers, etc where franchise changing guys ahead of time. 

Edited by PootieNunu
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Once we're out of it, and in this division that could be week 18, play the young guys primarily and see what we have on our roster. We need to have some real game film on what we have for assets. Now a move like this may or may not result in losing, but I care less about a top 10 pick if we have 2 or 3 guys, like maybe Cade Mays, who can actually contribute and just need to see the field to prove it. 

I feel like we’ve already got a ton of young guys getting a good number of snaps. We’re even using Cade Mays at FB to get him on the field haha. So in the case of Cade Mays for example, who would you bench in the finale to squeeze him into the line-up? Like just move a healthy Corbett or Bozeman to the bench and start Mays? I know teams will do that to preserve starters for the playoff if they’ve already secured their playoff seeding going into the season finale, but I’m not sure I’ve ever seen a losing team deliberately bench a quality starter in favor of a rookie just to get them some snaps.
 

Maybe it happens, and I could entertain the idea that a coach would do something like that. I feel like it’s weird particularly for o-line though cause their job is to protect the quarterback. So knowingly starting a worse o-line just for the sake of getting a young guy reps and consequently putting your QB at heightened risk of getting destroyed seems almost unethical lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Snake said:

We are talking hypothetical situations. These is no reason to speculate. My awnser is what it is in a hypothetical situation. 

No clue what you’re saying….my question is specifically about you calling the team “stupid” if they win enough to drop out of the top 10. That implies that they have control over that outcome and could do something to ensure that they tank their way into that Top 10 pick. And that’s what I’m asking you about - what you would do to ensure the tank.

Otherwise it’s like…”ugh the Panthers are such idiots for losing out on the chance at a top 10 pick”

”Oh what would you have done differently to get the outcome you wanted?”

”Beats me, I dunno…but they’re still so stupid for not doing it”

Is that actually what’s going on here?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Gerry Green said:

 

What if, now hear me out. What if Corral comes in, after a year of learning, and impresses? Minshew, then Corral, and Richardson to the Practice Squad? Or do we keep 3 QBs? God I love this game.

I was high on Corral before the draft, but the road to him becoming even a competent QB in the NFL is long and twisted. The Coach who drafted him has been fired, also likely that the OC who seemed to love him will as well, he hardly played/practiced leading up to the draft due to an ankle injury in his bowl game, then he got next to no reps in the preseason because of history's saddest QB competition, then got injured in the preseason preventing him from taking valuable reps at practice he would need to get up to NFL game speed throughout his rookie year.

We are coming up on a calendar year since Corral played any relevant football, and by the time offseason activities kick off it will be roughly 18 months since he saw extended action even in a practice environment, not even counting the NFL level.

Dude got worst case scenario'd in terms of the team he got drafted to.

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

I was high on Corral before the draft, but the road to him becoming even a competent QB in the NFL is long and twisted. The Coach who drafted him has been fired, also likely that the OC who seemed to love him will as well, he hardly played/practiced leading up to the draft due to an ankle injury in his bowl game, then he got next to no reps in the preseason because of history's saddest QB competition, then got injured in the preseason preventing him from taking valuable reps at practice he would need to get up to NFL game speed throughout his rookie year.

We are coming up on a calendar year since Corral played any relevant football, and by the time offseason activities kick off it will be roughly 18 months since he saw extended action even in a practice environment, not even counting the NFL level.

Dude got worst case scenario'd in terms of the team he got drafted to.

 

According to Rhule he didn't have control over the roster so that would imply Corral was someone else's choice.  If you believe him. In any case I do not think we are in any position to be dicarding young qb prospects just yet. Whether fans think he is worth it or not they need all they can get to sift through for a possible keeper. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

According to Rhule he didn't have control over the roster so that would imply Corral was someone else's choice.  If you believe him. In any case I do not think we are in any position to be dicarding young qb prospects just yet. Whether fans think he is worth it or not they need all they can get to sift through for a possible keeper. 

I actually belive that Corral wasnt a rhule choice.  It was really a Mcadoo pick. Fits his scheme of getting the ball out quickly.

In my honest opinion, Mcadoo will be gone next season which will effectively limit Corrals potential of being our qb1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Ocpanthertew714 said:

I actually belive that Corral wasnt a rhule choice.  It was really a Mcadoo pick. Fits his scheme of getting the ball out quickly.

In my honest opinion, Mcadoo will be gone next season which will effectively limit Corrals potential of being our qb1

I would not worry to much about whose qb1 until the next head coach is hired and he has filled out the room.  I cannot get excited about the draft until the next coach is announced. And if there will be a new GM to hire said coach. 

To me it's pointless to even think about which qb we should take until we know what kind of offense we intend to run. Or for that matter, who the OC is going to be.

But I get it, you Mel Kipper wannabes have to be heard. So I will try to stay out of it as much as I can.  But you make it hard to sometimes. 

Edited by Jon Snow
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

I would not worry to much about whose qb1 until the next head coach is hired and he has filled out the room.  I cannot get excited about the draft until the next coach is announced. And if there will be a new GM to hire said coach. 

To me it's pointless to even think about which qb we should take until we know what kind of offense we intend to run. Or for that matter, who the OC is going to be.

But I get it, you Mel Kipper wannabes have to be heard. So I will try to stay out of it as much as I can.  But you make it hard to sometimes. 

Hahha

Actually read what I said...

I'm basically stating Corral was more of a Mcadoo pick l due to his quick release and relatability to the type of offense Mcadoo wants to run. Research it. Maybe you'll gain insight for once.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ocpanthertew714 said:

Hahha

Actually read what I said...

I'm basically stating Corral was more of a Mcadoo pick l due to his quick release and relatability to the type of offense Mcadoo wants to run. Research it. Maybe you'll gain insight for once.

I read it. I'm not sure what you are talking about because McAdoo will not be here so it doesn't matter how Corral got here. If he stays will be uo to the new coaching staff.  I'm not even discussing whether he has talent or not.  Maybe you should read my post.... for once.

F*ck you too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MasterAwesome said:

No clue what you’re saying….my question is specifically about you calling the team “stupid” if they win enough to drop out of the top 10. That implies that they have control over that outcome and could do something to ensure that they tank their way into that Top 10 pick. And that’s what I’m asking you about - what you would do to ensure the tank.

Otherwise it’s like…”ugh the Panthers are such idiots for losing out on the chance at a top 10 pick”

”Oh what would you have done differently to get the outcome you wanted?”

”Beats me, I dunno…but they’re still so stupid for not doing it”

Is that actually what’s going on here?

Look my statement is what it is. I'm not getting into a argument that has no right or wrong awnser. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

I read it. I'm not sure what you are talking about because McAdoo will not be here so it doesn't matter how Corral got here. If he stays will be uo to the new coaching staff.  I'm not even discussing whether he has talent or not.  Maybe you should read my post.... for once.

F*ck you too.

Haha 

You're an old dirty bastard

Stop being so crusty

I like u tho...

 Cheers   !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Agreed. A healthy bit from column A (stats) and column B (film) paints the most accurate picture, which is currently that Bryce is not performing up to the standard a 1st round QB (let alone drafted #1 overall) is expected to (statistically). When we dig into the film to see why, we see that while he's having his struggles (not stepping up in the pocket, bailing out early, hesitating on some throws, making occasional bad reads, etc) the team that surrounded him last season was simply awful. Bottom 5 defense, bottom 5 OL, bottom 5 weapons... but somehow one player has to overcome ALL of that in their rookie season? Yeesh... Taking this season into consideration, he started where he left off last season and was rightfully benched. Since starting again, the team has gotten on its first winning streak in a few years and he's made good plays to keep them in the game. Is he lighting it up? Nah... but he is beginning to show the reason so many draftniks had him as QB1a for his class. Re: what the team does next season... who friggin knows anymore at this point T_T. Resign Dalton? Sign Jones? Draft somebody in the mid-to-late rounds? Go with another UFA? Maybe grab an FA that can compete with Bryce for the starting position and draft a rookie to sit and develop? Might be best of both worlds for the team, but ugh... not a fun position to still be in with question marks throughout the position group.
    • Yeah, this is basically the same as asking, "What if Bryce Young suddenly had Patrick Mahomes brain, how would he do?" It isn't happening. This ship is beyond sailed. Send him somewhere else, let us move on and him move on. 
    • Dalton is too close to starting right now. If it hadn't been for a car accident, he still would be. Switching Dalton for Jones does nothing except reduce the backup's age by a decade. One is in his NFL prime, the other is almost in his NFL grave. Not a horrible move if you're trying to improve the team. We've got to get better as a team and a lateral move like that would improve the team. The problem isn't that he's close to starting. The problem is we have a GM that signed off on BY and didn't bring in any serious QB competition for camp, a HC that said yeah, he's my guy until BY poo the bed so bad he couldn't start him, and an offense that's limited because BY can't make all the throws a normal NFL QB can.  The problem isn't that Jones could be an improvement as a backup QB. The problem is he could be better than our "franchise" QB. 
×
×
  • Create New...