Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB Will Levis declaring for the NFL draft

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

KatsAzz Grand Master

KatsAzz

Posted
Posted (edited)

I only see two quarterbacks: C.J. Stroud and Bryce Young that are worthy of being taken in Rd # 1 in the 2023 NFL Draft, in my opinion. 

Those two are followed in order by  Will Levis, Tanner McKee and Anthony Richardson, 3 that are long shots to be  selected in 1st rd but more likely  2nd rd choices. 

If C.J. Stroud and Bryce Young are both gone when the Panthers are selecting, I am wondering if they will roll the dice and pick either Levis, McKee, Richardson, or just chose the best player available?

Edited by KatsAzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Kentucky Panther said:

If you are advocating for him to be drafted in the first you’re blind. He’s awful. If you’re not, I wouldn’t consider that “backing” and I would be confused as to why you’re quoting me.  
 

I didn’t even realize Florida fans liked him until these threads started popping up. 

I think the only Florida fan is @Varking. The rest of us are intrigued by his potential, as many NFL scouts are too apparently.

Hopefully you aren’t backing Levis since you have Kentucky in your user name…

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
raleigh-panther Grand Master

raleigh-panther

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, bythenbrs said:

So, by that criteria you would reject Lebron James, David Beckham, Dennis Rodman and Colin Kaepernick for having Biblically themed tattoos?  Seems pretty judgmental and narrow minded…

You know what I’m saying …and frankly no, I’m not a fan of those players either.    live a life that you don’t have to advertise Bible scriptures on your bicep 

As far as Levis , I’m judgmental having watched him fail in big games for two years

his tape doesn’t lie and no, he isn’t the second coming  of Josh Allen 

Edited by raleigh-panther
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jayboogieman Grand Master

jayboogieman

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

Speaking of QB's, how is Bryce Young 6' and Stetson is 5'11"? Bryce is clearly shorter

 

 

1 hour ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I'll tell ya how.  Because Bryce is 5'10" lol

I don't care how tall he is or how much he weighs. He plays with and against NFL size players every week. What matters is if he can play the position or not and take a hit. The answer to those questions is yes. Young has shown he's tough and plays QB better than any of the other guys in this class.

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
raleigh-panther Grand Master

raleigh-panther

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

 

I don't care how tall he is or how much he weighs. He plays with and against NFL size players every week. What matters is if he can play the position or not and take a hit. The answer to those questions is yes. Young has shown he's tough and plays QB better than any of the other guys in this class.

Don’t disagree on his ability but durability given workload in the pros is a lot more than college….there are 17 regular games plus 3  preseason plus all the other physical preparation work

his frame seems pretty small…it really has to be a concern and consideration 

Edited by raleigh-panther
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jayboogieman Grand Master

jayboogieman

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

Don’t disagree …but there are 17 regular games plus 3  preseason plus all the other physical preparation work

his frame seems pretty small…it really has to be a consideration 

I'd rather take the chance on Young than a guy that seems to fold at the slightest pressure(Stroud), a guy that can't make good decisions(Levis), a one year wonder in a weaker conference(Penix/Nix), or the raw, but physically talented guy(Richardson).

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
Just now, jayboogieman said:

I'd rather take the chance on Young than a guy that seems to fold at the slightest pressure(Stroud), a guy that can't make good decisions(Levis), a one year wonder in a weaker conference(Penix/Nix), or the raw, but physically talented guy(Richardson).

whats your threshold for size for where you wouldnt draft him?  Its looking now at best he is 5'11 190.  At best.  But other scouts/analyst are pegging him 5'10 180ish.  I dont give 2 chits how he is playing now or who it is against that type of size puts a team behind the 8 ball from the jump for numerous reasons.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Catsfan69 Grand Master

Catsfan69

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

 

I don't care how tall he is or how much he weighs. He plays with and against NFL size players every week. What matters is if he can play the position or not and take a hit. The answer to those questions is yes. Young has shown he's tough and plays QB better than any of the other guys in this class.

Not true. Kyler Murray knows he himself is too short.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...