Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

All the fans that want to tank, you guys are all in on Stroud?


GoobyPls
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

Ohio State has been a great program under 4 different coaches over the past 20 years or so.

Name their best NFL QB ever.

 

I'll wait over here.

Someone brought up only 4 have been taken in the first and 2 of the 4 were from like the 1940s. It just leaves Haskins (mental issues) and Fields (looks promising, but too early to tell).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, X-Clown said:

 

Who was the best nfl qb that played for Texas tech before mahomes? What about Wyoming before Josh allen? LSU before Joe Burrow? Oregon before Justin Herbert? Cal before Aaron Rodgers? Michigan before Brady?

 


 

 

 

The difference is none of those schools QBs get a lot of attention. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MHS831 said:

Ohio State has been a great program under 4 different coaches over the past 20 years or so.

Name their best NFL QB ever.

 

I'll wait over here.

Joe Burrow was there for three seasons. Justin Fields last 5 games has his team averaging 30 points a game ( and they just did 10 points without him ). Don’t scout the school. Scout the player. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Varking said:

Maybe somebody will Fields him and a false story about how he’s a last in, first out kid who doesn’t work hard? Or that OSU QBs don’t work in the NFL? ( ignoring his recent stretch where they were the top scoring team in the NFL for five weeks and then dropped to 10 points this week without him )

Like how Corral fell because he’s an alcoholic who beats up kids?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Right now, we are 6th in the draft order.

Three teams ahead of us, (Chicago, Denver, and Pittsburgh) won't be taking a quarterback.

The Texans probably will.   Detroit is up in the air.  They currently have one of the top passing offenses in the league, so they may decide that they are good enough.  

Also, even if we fall further back in the draft, three of the teams behind us are unlikely to take a qb.  Of course, some team (Falcons, Colts) could trade up I suppose.

Seattle has Denver’s pick

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a prospect who looks strong on the field but has the question marks, makes sense to bring them in and see if they are indeed a nutjob or not.  Especially if they couldn't get a good sense in limited time to meet him at the combine.  Randy Mueller has talked about it before -- many GMs don't just use these top-30s to validate the guys they already love.  Although we seem to do that and kind of show our cards a lot lol.   But to the point, if they love tape, have met enough coaches/teammates and talked to them at the bowls/workouts, many teams don't need to wine and dine and get to know them.   There's certain guys who get to know regional scouts, GMs and position coaches starting mid-college season last year.    On the flipside, there's the wildcards who aren't privy to developing relationships with the pro-community while in school, have bad reps, and teams need to dig a bit further into it.  A top-30 becomes a good measuring stick for those teams think could be a stellar fit but are unsure on who the guy actually is - which matters a ton at the end of the day.  Organizational fit has so much more weight than let on and is why these drafts after the first few picks get so all over the map.  
    • https://x.com/rapsheet/status/1909256874043597020?s=46&t=xeIgh_-Vr2aKxBkBJdfnKA   CB Quincy Riley 
    • I mean, NTs are already basically a unicorn. You're looking for a guy who is big enough and strong enough to hold up snap after snap with two 300+ pound NFL athlete technically proficient people movers trying desperately to move you off that spot. That is a HARD guy to find that can hold his ground snap after snap in those scenarios. It's the trade off of the 3-4. Teams love it because it puts more speed on the field and 3-4 OLBs are easier to find than 4-3 DEs but that NT is a hard spot to fill.
×
×
  • Create New...