Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Darnold is the best QB on this team


onmyown
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

I’m still not sure Sam is any better than PJ Walker 

I do not want a single QB on the roster outside of Corral to be here next year.  

Who knows. 

But he has more physical tools than anyone in this draft. Might as well roll with him the rest of the year save a pick on Baker and see what happens.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Who knows. 

But he has more physical tools than anyone in this draft. Might as well roll with him the rest of the year save a pick on Baker and see what happens.

I don’t care who Wilks plays to finish out the year.  I don’t want any of these guys as backups next year. 

I didn’t watch today.  Not watching Sam Darnold or Baker.  I’m ready for the new coach search and a new page. 

I’m going to intentionally watch one more game of bad QB play with my college team this Saturday and I’m done this year watching my teams.  I’ll just watch random good games. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, frankw said:

Only a bigot or someone slow in the head would use the SB50 fumble as an opportunity to randomly denigrate one of the most important players in franchise history during a game against the Broncos.

I'm such a bigot that I have biracial children and am pounding the desk for Penix.

Cam Newton should have been the best QB in history with his physical tools and he came up woefully short in my opinion. 

Great human being but only a Good QB

 

And not jumping on the fumble was as inexcusable as Kasay kicking the ball out of bounds.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

I don’t care who Wilks plays to finish out the year.  I don’t want any of these guys as backups.   

I didn’t watch today.  Not watching Sam Darnold or Baker. 

I’m going to intentionally watch one more game of bad QB play with my college team this Saturday and I’m done this year watching my teams.  I’ll just watch random good games. 

 

He played well. Why wouldn't you watch?

I've never missed an actual game in history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KatsAzz said:

Bingo!! I fully agree. Plus, Sam Darnold  has been  learning more about how the defense works and the looks they are giving him.

We need to remember Sam is only 25 years old, still learning and could show even more improvement  since he is presently on the best NFL team that he has been on, one that is giving him the protection ever quarterback needs.

I have no idea how Sam's long term career will play out here or someplace else, so my take is we will have to sit back and see what happens the rest of this season before passing complete judgement.

Geno Smith was a bust.  Remember?  Some times, it takes time.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

I'm such a bigot that I have biracial children and am pounding the desk for Penix.

Cam Newton should have been the best QB in history with his physical tools and he came up woefully short in my opinion. 

Great human being but only a Good QB

 

And not jumping on the fumble was as inexcusable as Kasay kicking the ball out of bounds.

So the latter then? You've gone on tangents about how much you dislike running quarterbacks because they can't win the big game multiple times just in the last month alone and moved the goalposts when people mention guys like Joe Montana and Steve Young. What does throwing out Penix here now mean is that supposed to sway the conversation after your remarks? Good talk. Enjoy your evening guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • I agree with all of that and Fitterer definitely sucked.  Some of that may also be blamed on the fact that he did not start with a fresh regime to come in.  So he had already burned some of his wick when we were starting over with a new coach (twice). The reality is that we do not often see players traded for that kind of package in the NFL today.  We don't see teams selling off star players for large hauls to start a re-build.  Whether or not that is the correct decision is up for debate.  But in the NFL it's observable that the opposite is mostly the case.  Teams tend to over value present assets vs future assets. It all goes back to the fact that "now" is all that matters if you're running an NFL team.  They say the NFL stands for "not for long".  You don't have the luxury to sow a field that won't be harvested until after you're gone.  Nobody's that selfless in NFL front offices.
    • I think part of the problem though is Fitts never embraced the rebuild and had a bigger picture plan for building a team. He was constantly trying to add a piece here or there to be competitive. Sometimes you just need to tear it down and start over. Rhule was gone. We were going to be hiring a new coach. New coach means new QB. And whether or not you are using them this year, future 1sts are valuable trading material plus we would have had their 2nd that year to add an edge rusher if we so chose.  How much different would it have looked if the trade for Bryce had been our 1st (9) and the Rams 2 1sts instead of our 24 1st which ended up being number 1 and DJ. A much better scenario for going and getting your new HC his new QB for his new offensive system instead of gutting the WR room. Sure, we would still end up losing Burns, but there was always the possibility that was going to happen anyway.  Self preservation no doubt played a role, but Fitts wasn't looking too hot already. It's never a good thing to see your GM panic in the draft room. 
×
×
  • Create New...