Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF grades (Week 11)

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

ColumbusCounty Proficient

ColumbusCounty

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

1. DE Amaré Barno: 74.9
2. S Sam Franklin Jr.: 70.1
3. LB Frankie Luvu: 69.6
4. S Xavier Woods: 68.2
5. CB Jaycee Horn: 65.8

Sam Franklin... low key becoming a beast on ST. If you would have asked me b4 this game though I would've never suggested he see playing time. But yesterday he made a couple of plays that caught my attention. 

Luvu and Woods are two players I'm glad we locked up for more than a year. I love the constant communication I see on defense. 

Barno though.... he's a project but I'd keep him around. Get that man a personal chef and lock him in the weight room. For where he was picked...if yesterday is as any early indication...I'm liking the returns. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PNW_PantherMan Grand Master

PNW_PantherMan

Posted
Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, Martin said:

What didn’t you like about his game this week? 

He was routinely taken care of by a single blocker the entire game.  Most of the times he makes a play is when someone else gets penetration and forces the play back to him, or they forget to block him entirely.  One of his hurries was completely unblocked.  Same with the sack

Edited by PNW_PantherMan
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Basbear said:

Why earth does the coaching staff want CJ Henderson in the parking lot before the snap?? If trust level is that bad, play a different CB...

 

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

Play zone 10 yards off a guy they can usually keep separation 

Because Wilks' approach is the same as Ron's. Play 10 deep on that soft coverage. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Yep and apparently if you don't think so, you're too dumb to even converse with.😩

Burns sack was a blown assignment and he went completely untouched to the QB.  The RT, for whatever reason, took another player.  I could have made that sack.  Just say'n... it is what it is.  Hey, Burns padded his sack stats and ain't mad about it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
stratocatter Mentor

stratocatter

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

He was routinely taken care of by a single blocker the entire game.  Most of the times he makes a play is when someone else gets penetration and forces the play back to him, or they forget to block him entirely.  One of his hurries was completely unblocked.  Same with the sack

Yes. One man negates him in the run game. He needs to get bigger and stronger. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Martin Grand Master

Martin

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

He was routinely taken care of by a single blocker the entire game.  Most of the times he makes a play is when someone else gets penetration and forces the play back to him, or they forget to block him entirely.  One of his hurries was completely unblocked.  Same with the sack

I didn’t catch the whole game, but from what I saw the defense outside of Henderson was very, very good. Looked like Burns held up very well against the run and I didn’t see any mistakes on his past. If I remember correctly he bullrushed the LT a few times. He’s no Lawrence Taylor for sure, and he never will be, but I thought he had a good game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Martin
      Why I Believe That We Will Trade Down

      By Martin · Posted

      I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • MHS831
      General Draft Rumors/Speculation Thread

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • MHS831
      General Draft Rumors/Speculation Thread

      By MHS831 · Posted

      After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...