Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers at Ravens thread


rayzor
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, OGPanther1993 said:

Baker was undoubtedly bad but there isn’t a QB on this roster that would’ve looked decent under the circumstances today.

True but troting Baker out there knowing he's garbage could cost a later round draft pick.  We know what Baker is, and that's not a QB1.  Experiment over.  Darnold and/or Walker the rest of the season.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

Keep telling yourself that and maybe one day it will come true. 

If you wanna keep being joyless over two (Two) frst round picks be my guest.

We both know you would've hated those players anway because you refuse to enjoy anything.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CPantherKing said:

Fitt is just going to keep trading for failed 1st round picks in hopes the 1st round picks he rated highly like Darnold, Mayfield, and Henderson will prove they are worth a 1st round pick. 

I doubt it.  Even if Fitts had a hand in those decisions outside of the execution portion of the trades, with Rhule gone now, he wouldn't double down on stupid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

He could rushed over many times and overplayed more times then I could count.  He played like poo.   Let’s not try and make things up.   He continues to take these wide ass angles and let the play come through underneath him.    

You are just trying to create a narrative to validate your thoughts on the Rams trade being a miss. The Ravens struggled mightily to move the ball against us and Burns was a primary factor of that. 

Burns never lost contain today, hence why Lamar couldnt get poo on the ground.  This is knit pick poo.

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OGPanther1993 said:

Baker was undoubtedly bad but there isn’t a QB on this roster that would’ve looked decent under the circumstances today.

Numerous times he could have stepped up in the pocket today. The last couple drives they brought more pressure but earlier he was just playing scared

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Smithers said:

That burns is an average player who isn’t worth the hype.  “Superstar” players don’t whiff regularly and rack up multiple offsides penalties in a game.  JPP outplayed Burns and only played like 15 snaps

That is an erroneous as it is self-serving. 

You are exposing your lack of football knowledge with that nonsense.

I really want to be nice but that is sheer stupidity.

You're going to be one of those guys complaining when Burns is paid like the player he is. He has more sacks in NFL history at his age and is the best pass rusher we have had since Peppers. He sacked Lamar twice today. You need to educate yourself about what actually constitutes real football.

Seriously, I know I sound like an old fart, but God almighty there used to be a better level of football knowledge and discourse here. It is as depressing as the team has been.

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

You are just trying to create a narrative to validate your thoughts on the Rams trade being a miss. The Ravens struggled mightily to move the ball against us and Burns was a primary factor of that. 

Burns never lost contain today, hence why Lamar couldnt get poo on the ground.  This is knit pick poo.

I think we need to come to terms with the fact that we are not just a QB away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rags said:

If you wanna keep being joyless over two (Two) frst round picks be my guest.

We both know you would've hated those players anway because you refuse to enjoy anything.

Thank you. It's beyond mind numbing at this point. It's got to be called out if this site has a future

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Seltzer said:

Anyone who thinks Burns had a bad game is honestly too stupid to engage with. The defense outside of CJ was incredible.

Baker needs to take a permanent vacation from the NFL and take Shi with him.

TMJ was the lone bright spot offensively. 

He is developing into a legit WR2

Ah yes.  The old anyone who disagrees with me is stupid argument. From the guy calling this place a cesspool lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just admit that you don’t follow all the draft discussions on here. If draft results were so random, how come some teams tend to be perennial losers like us and some teams are perennial winners and it all starts with the draft? It’s almost comical these type of stupid responses. Oh, why aren’t you the GM? Gee I wonder since I work in a completely different field. How about you give us some examples of where the huddle consensus drafting was worse than our drafting from 2018 to 2025? I know I’ve given a ton of examples and you just shoot this generic poo of oh you couldn’t possibly done better as an armchair GM. Why don’t you dispute any of my examples? Let’s go to Brooks. I wanted Frazier at C because I still feel like that’s a hole. Other Huddlers mentioned DeJean at CB. Here’s why many of us didn’t want Brooks because 1) he might not play due to tearing his ACL late in the college season, 2) any scout/GM worth their salt would know that the 2025 RB draft class was loaded and 3) trading up multiple picks knowing 1 and 2 seems silly. Heck, after the draft, pretty clear that day 3 was where the RB value was. The huddle was right on Brooks and at most, we’ll get 2 years of Brooks while Hubbard is still under contract. If you know so much about the underlying machinations of the draft, you should be able to dispute the actual examples and how the huddle’s picks were just plain lucky and how Dan, Scott and Marty’s picks were just unlucky. Pulling the why aren’t you an NFL GM is a much repeated response when an actual reasoned response isn’t possible. Our drafting hasn’t been unlucky the past 7 drafts, it’s just been bad with lost of idiotic moves that were far worse than the huddle consensus.
    • I got y’all https://static01.nyt.com/athletic/uploads/wp/2025/04/09073220/2025-Beast-v02.pdf Th3!Be@$T!#2025
    • 100%!! Last year we focused completely on offense, and it made leaps, especially when Bryce settled in for the 2nd half of the season. We kept all those players and improved our RB stable this free agency! This year we focused almost entirely on D, specifically our run D. I expect it to jump to at least average, which would be awesome considering they are starting at dead frikin last. Our draft class from last year, however, doesn't exactly make me tingle. I know, I know..."traded away our first round pick, give them time to develop", but still. The 1 gem was Coker, a UDFA who I really like, but he ain't exactly Randy Moss. We have to do better! We can't afford to only build via Free agency.
×
×
  • Create New...