Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Games Week 12


Varking
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

Richardson is big, fast and strong if he shows that he can retain info and is a good human can’t see he can’t be our QB, he’s more physically gifted than Hurts. One thing I would like to know is how does he look after he gets popped does he get rattled? 

He didn't get rattled taking a hit after throwing that 74 yard bomb. Highest ceiling of the class, everyone else are stuck in the mud and he's doing things others can't. For some reason they didn't even run him today 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

He didn't get rattled taking a hit after throwing that 74 yard bomb. Highest ceiling of the class, everyone else are stuck in the mud and he's doing things others can't. For some reason they didn't even run him today 

 

Going off history and his inconsistency’s he could be had around the Lamar/Hurts draft range and we good get a blue chipper with our first or trade back 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aussie Tank said:

Going off history and his inconsistency’s he could be had around the Lamar/Hurts draft range and we good get a blue chipper with our first or trade back 

It's still really early for that, if we pick high and could trade back we could get 2 good players. If we pick around 8 again it's gonna be tough on the GM/HC to decide between Richardson or "BPA". I don't think he'll make it past 15 or so. A relatively good team will have no problem grabbing him and sitting him behind a starter for a year or seeing if he can beat out your Carr/Daniels Jones/Mac Jones/Zach Wilson, probably more mid guys that could lose their job to him off versatility alone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

It's still really early for that, if we pick high and could trade back we could get 2 good players. If we pick around 8 again it's gonna be tough on the GM/HC to decide between Richardson or "BPA". I don't think he'll make it past 15 or so. A relatively good team will have no problem grabbing him and sitting him behind a starter for a year or seeing if he can beat out your Carr/Daniels Jones/Mac Jones/Zach Wilson, probably more mid guys that could lose their job to him off versatility alone

But if they rate him as a potential franchise QB just gotta pull the trigger 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Aussie Tank said:

But if they rate him as a potential franchise QB just gotta pull the trigger 

Yeah, for the "tankers", tanking is asking for a gamble. Richardson is the gamble. You shouldn't tank for Stroud or Young who have low/average ceilings. I like Bryce but you gotta do the whole Saints thing with him with great line and WR's to outscore average teams. Stroud is a second too slow in the pocket to deal with NFL pressure. Levis would be a 3rd-5th round pick if old white dudes would stop talking about him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yeah, for the "tankers", tanking is asking for a gamble. Richardson is the gamble. You shouldn't tank for Stroud or Young who have low/average ceilings. I like Bryce but you gotta do the whole Saints thing with him with great line and WR's to outscore average teams. Stroud is a second too slow in the pocket to deal with NFL pressure. Levis would be a 3rd-5th round pick if old white dudes would stop talking about him

Remember mate were just poo kickers teams tell the truth with draft capital. First I want to hire the best offensive coach we can get and let him choose. I’ll get behind who ever they choose if they use premium capital because they will believe that they’ve got a franchise guy. Sure I’ve got my favourites but I’m just a bloke who drives buggies in swamps killing mozzies 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Eric4280 said:

I don’t know if it’s been discussed- would anyone hate taking Rattler later?

If he is available later. Which for me is 5th-7th, I would probably actually love the pick. Those are the sweet spot for drafting dudes who might not be all upstairs but have crazy talent. Like a Burfict or a Hardy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Aussie Tank said:

Richardson is big, fast and strong if he shows that he can retain info and is a good human can’t see he can’t be our QB, he’s more physically gifted than Hurts. One thing I would like to know is how does he look after he gets popped does he get rattled? 

He's inaccurate as hell. He misses by miles not inches on his bad throws. He will be an interception machine. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nah I wanna see these NFL evaluators talking about his prospects at WR aren't good because I would LOVE to see thier explanations 
    • You do realize that raw stats don't make someone a better or worse player, right? To begin with, the last time I checked, 1,319 is more yards than 1,258, so T-Mac had more yards (but I'll forgive you as a typo there and say you meant catches lol), but that's before even factoring in that Hunter did his in 13 games vs 12 for T-Mac because Arizona didn't make a bowl game. It's also completely ignoring the team around each player.  If you think Hunter having the 8th place finisher in the Heisman voting at QB isn't going to result in helping his top WRs stats, then you're sticking your head in the sand to purposefully not see it. Hunter's QB had 353 completions for 4,134 yards and 37 TDs vs T-Mac's QB who had 260 completions for 2,958 yards and 18 TDs. But sure, let's rank NFL prospects by their stats and say the guy with more catches and TDs is the better prospect.  So on that note, I now change my mind, T-Mac is no longer the best WR in the draft, it's Nick Nash who had 104 rec, 1,382 yards, and 16 TDs, all numbers better than Hunter's... because that's how this is done, right? As I've said before, if someone wants to like a player better than someone else that's totally fair, but come with real reasons, talk about their play, but to talk about things like stats as your reasoning, when you ignore the obvious and massive flaws in using those stats in that way, just makes you look dumb.
    • Nah you don't go out and put up the numbers he did without being able to run routes dude is a football junky so he works on his craft he isn’t THAT much more athletic than other players to just be able to go out and do whatever and succeed at that level 
×
×
  • Create New...