Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper does have his positives


ChuckWag78
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, ChuckWag78 said:

I just saw the above reported. This is one thing we won't have to worry about as long as Tepper owns the team. We saw this first hand with Rhule. 

If he is too inept to be involved to be in the hiring process yet too stupid or egotistical to recognize this, on top of not knowing how the NFL works, what does it matter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

So you're mad how Tepper handled the rock hill project? 

I guess it would be pretty cut and dry, if the other partners in that project upheld their end of the deal, but they did not.  So now Tepper be damn for protecting his and the Carolina Panthers interest?

Sounds like hypocritical bullshit to me. 

Not sure why the rich have to be hated so much. 

Have you read the legal contract documentation and bankruptcy filings regarding the Rock Hill and Tepper situation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Ocpanthertew714 said:

Yeah but what about Rock Hill?

One of the weird things about billionaires is how often they're willing to waste their own and everybody else's time fighting over sums of money completely trivial to them for spite.

IMO when you're a billionaire, you should stop thinking about money and start thinking about time. It's the nonrenewable resource that is far more finite to you than money is at that point. 

Tepper is just screwing himself and everyone else by being petty over Rock Hill.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of the younger owners (relatively speaking), I'd like him to model things like a Biscotti or Kroenke who similarly purchased their way into the league instead of family inheritance but they didn't place themselves as a Jones type czar.

He honestly just needs to find his version of Roseman, Les Snead or Ozzie/DeCosta.  I'm unsure if Fit and/or Dan can really elevate into the Executive GM type role, but who knows, maybe it clicks.  That's the missing part on the football side IMO.  He needs to find his trusted right hand (or two) and we're kind of in a TBD with Scott and Morgan right now.  Internally, I'm guessing there really doesn't feel to be a need for an executive between them and Tepper given he's a bit more hands on.  Just hope he owns up to the need if it becomes apparent there's a gap in structure.  

On the non-football side of things, Kristi Coleman and Nicole are running the show on paper/from what we know, likely with DT's heavy hand.  That's where overall, I just hope he doesn't f*ck over the QC.  

I get the sense it's a heavy guided hand, with moments of "Dammit guys, just do this now, we need it" but overall, he may be a bit more hands off on a day to day than is let on.  Rock Hill was a mess, that's really all that needs to be said, should've been elsewhere IMO.

Just turn the corner, don't screw over the city that made this possible, and you know, win.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/16/2022 at 2:14 PM, Ocpanthertew714 said:

Yeah but what about Rock Hill?

Yeah there’s a lot to bash Tepper on but this one isn’t it. I’m not trying to defend a billionaire but the city truly did just stop paying. Tepper could’ve financed the entire project but that wasn’t the deal so I don’t blame him one bit for pulling out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/16/2022 at 2:53 PM, Waldo said:

Mark Davis Sport GIF by UFC

How could a billionaire with a kids bowl cut get into a situation like this? 

Lolz...in Vages with a new expensive stadium. I don't feel one bit of pity for anyone dumb enough to hire McDanials as a HC with his history. 

Someone needs to arrest his barber.

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...