Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is this the best O-line since 2003?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, TheBigKat said:

I don’t think the 2015 O-line was anything more than serviceable. Where in 2003 yes it was a veteran O-line that was roided up like hell but guys like Steussie, Donalley, Mitchell were just opening lanes and the Mack truck known as Davis bulldozed through them.

 

If the Panthers are to have lasting success it starts with the lines and personally while I give Fitterer grief, what he’s done to retool the O-line in 2 seasons (Ekewonu, Corbett, Bozeman, Christensen) was nothing short of amazing work 

 

D125B898-D4EF-485D-BC8A-F98A681BABC6.jpeg

2008 was a really good line. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2015 oline serviceable? Wut? Pretty sure it ranked like #2 and was on or near the top of every known measurable we have.

furthermore, just watching how they moved with a qb like cam thy year was impressive

there are many years cams oline was ‘serviceable’ ranking around 17/18, but 2015 I’m going with more than just serviceable 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nah I wanna see these NFL evaluators talking about his prospects at WR aren't good because I would LOVE to see thier explanations 
    • You do realize that raw stats don't make someone a better or worse player, right? To begin with, the last time I checked, 1,319 is more yards than 1,258, so T-Mac had more yards (but I'll forgive you as a typo there and say you meant catches lol), but that's before even factoring in that Hunter did his in 13 games vs 12 for T-Mac because Arizona didn't make a bowl game. It's also completely ignoring the team around each player.  If you think Hunter having the 8th place finisher in the Heisman voting at QB isn't going to result in helping his top WRs stats, then you're sticking your head in the sand to purposefully not see it. Hunter's QB had 353 completions for 4,134 yards and 37 TDs vs T-Mac's QB who had 260 completions for 2,958 yards and 18 TDs. But sure, let's rank NFL prospects by their stats and say the guy with more catches and TDs is the better prospect.  So on that note, I now change my mind, T-Mac is no longer the best WR in the draft, it's Nick Nash who had 104 rec, 1,382 yards, and 16 TDs, all numbers better than Hunter's... because that's how this is done, right? As I've said before, if someone wants to like a player better than someone else that's totally fair, but come with real reasons, talk about their play, but to talk about things like stats as your reasoning, when you ignore the obvious and massive flaws in using those stats in that way, just makes you look dumb.
    • Nah you don't go out and put up the numbers he did without being able to run routes dude is a football junky so he works on his craft he isn’t THAT much more athletic than other players to just be able to go out and do whatever and succeed at that level 
×
×
  • Create New...