Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Good analysis on Bryce Young vs LSU


JawnyBlaze
 Share

Recommended Posts

52 minutes ago, Waldo said:

He is so damn tiny. Great vision but he scares the hell out of me. I would be happy to snag a DE and then trade back up into the 1st with our 2nds for him. He looks like he is 5'10" at best and under 180 lbs lol. The combine measurements is going to be his biggest hurdle for him with his skills. Could be a legit NFL starter or a guy who peaked in school.

lol.  Trading back into the 1st for young.  Keep dreaming he will probably be gone before our 1st selection

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Icege said:

I've grown okay with the idea of gambling a 1st on Young despite his size, but I don't think any of the other QBs would be worth the swing. 😕

It's night and day compared to other prospects though how well he sees the field and goes through his progressions.

I can talk myself into Stroud at some level. I do prefer Young, though. Even though he's the size the Gramatica Bros., his skill level is elite.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

A QB who could take a beating was important when the o-line was paper mache. We need someone who can pass and this dude has elite accuracy.

Exactly, we are making strides in o-line consistency for the first time since the early 2000s. As long as he doesn't come in there at 5'9", I wouldn't be opposed. I'd rather take him and he explode into thin air from a hit than take Will Levis. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Good Video.  Makes me more comfortable about Young.  You can have all the tools, ie J. Russell, but if you can't process the field and make the correct decision, you'll never make it in the NFL.  I'd rather have a 6 foot QB that can process than a 6"4" physical specimen but can't read the field. 

Can we take Young's brain and put it in Sam Darnold's body?

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, NorthTryon said:

Exactly, we are making strides in o-line consistency for the first time since the early 2000s. As long as he doesn't come in there at 5'9", I wouldn't be opposed. I'd rather take him and he explode into thin air from a hit than take Will Levis. 

McShay says he is 5'10'' and recently weighed 186.  But at the combine, it is possible he is 5'9''...won't be an easy choice, but if he's there and our new staff says take him, I won't say a word...everyone knows his size is a concern, and everyone knows you ain't winning till you get a QB.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't care about offensive production for a team that literally only threw to him and the running back. I care about what I see on film:   Dude cannot separate on his own against talented LBs/S and had to be schemed open; his route running is below average; while pretty athletic, he doesn't have elite athleticism or speed; his blocking form has quite a few red flags (dude should be a dominant run blocker for his size). He was talented enough to get open in college against a slower LB/S; that won't be the case in the NFL. Not to mention, the dude pretty much was nonexistent until this year for Penn St. If I am drafting a TE in the top 10, choosing a 5th year senior that didn't do anything until his last season should be pretty alarming. Not saying he is going to be a bad player - I think he will be a solid short/intermediate possession TE in the NFL. I just don't understand the logic of taking him top 10
    • No one is arguing where we were on the season.  After the benching Bryce was one of the top deep ball passers in the league.  It's a skillset he has just shown he is capable of doing.  I believe he led the league in week 12 and was one of the top ones for that final quarter.  Dance around the topic and argue the stats all you want, I'm just going by what I saw on TV and read about.   https://x.com/PattonAnalytics/status/1877044086709854343 https://www.si.com/nfl/panthers/news/bryce-young-best-against-pressure-throwing-deep Hey it surprised me as well, but I'm not going to hide my head in the sand and try to ignore what is clearly right in front of me.  People have a hard time admitting their original thought may have been wrong.  That's just the world we live in.  We will see if Young can keep it up next year or not, but signs are point to DC running his offense regardless of who is QB.  
    • You are right, but as of late there has been more rookie TEs making immediate impact on teams. McBride, Laporta, Kincaid and obv Bowers.  My true opinion is the team has so many holes they can go multiple directions including Safety. So it just comes down to out of all the talent in the draft who will make the immediate impact. Wr? TE? LB? 
×
×
  • Create New...