Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lamar Jackson

DaveThePanther2008

By DaveThePanther2008,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Toomers Mentor

Toomers

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

1-3 vs 10-5 vs Prime Manning,Brady and Big Ben for Flacco

Yeah he's on the same level as Flacco

image.thumb.png.61ffa01bfc0c63916e274cbd69e2f399.png

  .Convenient again how you didn’t mention Flacco was 26-33 from 2015–19. And LJ has went 43-15 since. I guess the “pocket passing” model hit a wall at age 30. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Toomers Mentor

Toomers

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Catsfan69 said:

Or maybe Flacco's arm wore out?

How? That doesn’t happen to guys that can make every throw. Just QBs who run. Right? 
 

  Sure doesn’t seem like the Ravens were better off with Flacco. Dig up some actual relevant information. Who know? You might get lucky. 

Edited by Toomers
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

A ring trumps all things.

I don't if it's one in 20yrs 

So you think Foles is a legit top QB in the league.  Foles, Flacco, Brady, Mahomes, Stafford, Rogers, and Russ are the only ones with rings right now.  Foles is greater than Herbert, Burrow, Ryan, Dak, Lamar, and Allen (according to you).  Foles is on par with Brees, Rogers, Mahomes, Stafford and Russ (according to you).    Another reason why we can't take your QB takes very seriously....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Catsfan69 Grand Master

Catsfan69

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

So you think Foles is a legit top QB in the league.  Foles, Flacco, Brady, Mahomes, Stafford, Rogers, and Russ are the only ones with rings right now.  Foles is greater than Herbert, Burrow, Ryan, Dak, Lamar, and Allen (according to you).  Foles is on par with Brees, Rogers, Mahomes, Stafford and Russ (according to you).    Another reason why we can't take your QB takes very seriously....

I would take the majority of those players over Lamar.

Lamar isn't worth the price he's going to ask for. He's the Brian Burns of QBs.

We need to aim higher.

 

But I think you Jimmy amongst others are more worried about style points than results. You'd rather have a flashy guy that looks cool and gives you tingles over a boring guy that just gets the job done and wind.

You'd probably take Lamar over Payton Manning if they were both coming out of college at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
philit99 Mentor

philit99

Posted
Posted

Hey here is a great idea, let’s let our new head coach and Scott decide what QB we should go after. It is obvious Rhule had no idea what type of QB he wanted. The next coach may want a veteran or a QB in the draft. I am not a fan of giving up two years worth of 1st round picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

I would take the majority of those players over Lamar.

Lamar isn't worth the price he's going to ask for. He's the Brian Burns of QBs.

We need to aim higher.

 

But I think you Jimmy amongst others are more worried about style points than results. You'd rather have a flashy guy that looks cool and gives you tingles over a boring guy that just gets the job done and wind.

You'd probably take Lamar over Payton Manning if they were both coming out of college at the same time.

I like them to be able to make a play even when the OL breaks down.  Burrow is pretty good at that and I wouldn't say he has a ton of "style" points, younger Rogers was also good at this.  You are just too caught up in Super Bowl wins when that is without a doubt a TEAM effort and usually requires a solid HC as well.  Look no further than Stafford with Detroit (how many playoff games did he win there?).  Give that good QB and great team and solid HC and BOOM Super Bowl.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

I would take the majority of those players over Lamar.

Lamar isn't worth the price he's going to ask for. He's the Brian Burns of QBs.

We need to aim higher.

 

But I think you Jimmy amongst others are more worried about style points than results. You'd rather have a flashy guy that looks cool and gives you tingles over a boring guy that just gets the job done and wind.

You'd probably take Lamar over Payton Manning if they were both coming out of college at the same time.

Lamar flew under the radar a little in college.  I didn't think he could do what he is doing on this level.  This year I like Stroud (who isn't a runner), Young (size concerns scare me), then Levis/Richardson as project QBs with high ceilings, Penix has some potential, but more as the left handed gun slinger.  What's your solution to our QB issue?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Waldo
      BPA: Too Much Value to Trade Down

      By Waldo · Posted

      Just take less value for a trade back this year. 'But the trade value chart'... just doesn't matter when an extra 2nd should be enough to move back this year given the situation. I would take an extra 2nd over any player that could potentially be there at 8 and it's not close. Let the media bitch about it, just doesn’t matter if we walk away with an edge, FS and WR in  the first 2 rounds given how close all of that talent is when looking at it big picture. Fug the value chart and just give me a decent additional 2nd for the win. All it takes is someone falling in love with Sanders or the RB or whatever. If there was more talent in this draft then that would be a terrible idea but turning down a trade because the value was less than other years when the tellent is obviously less at the top of this draft would just show how poorly the people in charge understand this class and it's weaknesses. It would be like not finding a slot WR or RB later, just dumb IMO.
    • Bear Hands
      God forbid this is the way the Draft shakes out

      By Bear Hands · Posted

      I get a sense they are weighing defense along w/ BPA. Whoever the staff likes between Mykel/Ez is my sense here. I would also throw in Harmon but our FAs along with Brown/Robinson make it a tough fit.  Trade downs may be unlikely in our spot so taking that out per request, Membou could be BPA, but gut says we go DBPA. Positional value is there, upside is there, Less anxious about them vs Shemar. I don’t think there’s offensive skill guys worth it - maybe Golden. There’s no ILBs, no safeties worth it, Will Johnson - injuries, Barron - is he just a NB/FS?  It’s Mykel season.
    • Sup
      God forbid this is the way the Draft shakes out

      By Sup · Posted

      I said Warren but I totally could live with this too. BPA, and I don't think it's Williams or Shemar or any other defensive player in this scenario.
×
×
  • Create New...