Coaching Agreement?

[Mr. Scot]

4 hours ago, KillerKat said:

Dont blame him. It sucks going to work everyday arguing with stupid mother fugers. He is the interim for now. He must do what he must do.

I think people don't get that sometimes.

Most of us probably have or have previously had coworkers you couldn't stand. Well coaches are human too, and they don't like having difficult to deal with coworkers any more than you do.

Scott O'Brien was a famous example of that in Carolina. He was generally considered one of the better special teams coaches in the league, but nearly everybody that had to work with him hated him.

[onmyown]

it’s almost as if someone who wasn’t coaching who wanted to, wasn’t for a reason

Rhule was too stupid to figure that out. but no one wanted to play for Rhule. he was inept but his next biggest problem is he had zero connections and coaching for a small college coach when you already have a decent NFL resume frankly looks fuging retarded, that’s something Tepper was too stupid to figure out.

if you’re going to go the route that has a .01% chance of working out (hiring a college coach) for some dumbass reason, at least know he will have competent staff with experience

McAdoo is and was trash.

Edited November 9, 2022 by onmyown

[Mr. Scot]

1 hour ago, onmyown said:

it’s almost as if someone who wasn’t coaching who wanted to, wasn’t for a reason

Rhule was too stupid to figure that out. but no one wanted to play for Rhule. he was inept but his next biggest problem is he had zero connections and coaching for a small college coach when you already have a decent NFL resume frankly looks fuging retarded, that’s something Tepper was too stupid to figure out.

if you’re going to go the route that has a .01% chance of working out (hiring a college coach) for some dumbass reason, at least know he will have competent staff with experience

McAdoo is and was trash.

Agree to a point...Campen and Tabor have both been good.

Mind you, Tabor was unemployed and Campen was with the Texans. They wanted him back but he chose Carolina instead.

(the wisdom of that may be debatable but it benefits us regardless)

[pantherj]

1 hour ago, Pakmeng said:

You want to lose. Yet you say this. Do you not connect your thoughts?

Wilks wants to win. If Wilks thinks the best way to win is to start PJ, then Wilks makes bad decisions. If Wilks makes bad decisions now, then he is more likely to make bad decisions in the future. I care about future winning, therefor I want Wilks fired from the HC position. I hope that clears things up for you.

[raleigh-panther]

18 hours ago, Cdparr7 said:

Can’t really blame Baker. Stupid move unless you are tanking (which they consistently say they aren’t ) 

PJ is still PJ, take away the DJ Moore Touchdown and I’m not sure he got the start against Cinci. 
 

Baker came in and ideally would be the hot hand. Really strange decision. 

It’s all about Baker not hitting that 70% snap that triggers a 4th rd vs 5th rd pick 

darnold will play before Baker 

of course, it doesn’t really matter which one plays other than the draft choice give back.

It’s clear baker isn’t the answer so it’s smart business to not give up that better draft position