Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Burns really worth backing up a Brinks truck?


mc52beast
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hardest pill for me to swallow regarding Burns and our draft history:

Love Horn and was very much needed at the time. Hindsight sure, but imagine we had taken Micah Parsons to pair opposite Burns? Would have given us the ability to trade Burns for all of those picks and still have an elite pass rusher on a cheap deal. Yeesh. Always stuck asking “what could have been?” With this team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

There are EASILY ten defensive guys in the NFL who are worth twice what Burns is worth. Dude can't even get 10 sacks (fingers crossed for this season lol) and we're going to pay him like he's a TJ Watt.

Ellis and billy went through this past draft and singled out guys drafted later then burns that give equal or almost equal production.  Burns aint that good relative to the trade offer

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, BrianS said:

Really?  Does he?

Mike Rucker, 6'5", 275

Julius Peppers, 6'7", 295

Charles Johnson, 6'2", 275

Greg Hardy, 6'2", 280

JJ Watt, 6'5", 288

Myles Garret, 6'4", 271

Etc.

Brian Burns, 6'5", 250

 

He's 20 to 30 lbs lighter than a prototypical DE.  That matters.  Burns does not have the size or strength of a typical DE.  He does have exceptional speed.  Frankly, he fits as a 3-4 OLB far far better than he does as a DE.

So far, I am not convinced that Burns will ever be great for us.  He'll be good.  As long as he wants "good" money and not great, all is well.  But paying great money for good production isn't what smart teams do.

You just picked guys who were bigger. How about  a list of several guys Burns size who were or are considered some of the best in history.. How abou  Von Miller,  michael Strahan, Jack Youngblood, Jason Taylor,  Charles Haley ,etc.  And again it won't be big money before 2025 so you are wrong or exaggerating your point of view. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

They will extend him in the offseason to free up cap space for 2023

 

Also to be a more complete player he needs to add at least 20 lbs of muscle, I just dont see that happening

 

In closing, fug you fat neck fitt.  I truly hope your ass is canned you fuging moron

Some of the best players in the hall of fame were DEs close to Burns size. Strahan, Jack Youngblood, Charles Haley, future HOF Von Miller and the list goes on.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, SetfreexX said:

I feel like some of ya'll don't even watch him in our base fronts...he's normally standing up in a 2pt. 

Every now and then you see him in the Wide 9's, or a 3pt. 

People have to stop trying to force the idea that we run a traditional 4-3 defense, we don't and we haven't for a while. 

We've been hybrid more than anything with Even, and Odd fronts. 

''Pass Rushers'' get paid, that's just what it is, and that is his best attribute so he will get paid, he's on the 4th year of his rookie deal, and had his 5th year option picked up for 2023. They fact folks are worried about paying him is silly. 

The real piece is with NO help, he still has 6 sacks as the THE ONLY person an offense needs to pay attention to on the edge, and he is still producing. 

What ya'll should be looking at is who we can pair with him, to ease the load. I can understand not giving the ''bag'' to Reddick as he's somewhere between 10-20 lbs lighter than Brian (Reddick is 230-240 ish), and when Rhule nixed the signing of Carlos Dunlap (if you don't know go do your research) it hurt that group as we were in the latter stages of the FA period post draft and pickings were slim.

Brian is what you ''need'' in the NFL to win, you have to get after the QB and he does that as well as some of the best in the game, but stop trying to box him into a 4-3 role, he's not that. There really aren't a ton of guys in that ''traditional'' 43 role that excel as rushers. There are names, but the position is not what it used to be as Nickel is the base personnel package in the modern NFL, most teams are in it 60-70% of the time since offense feature 11 personnel, and spread sets, defending the run is harder because there are less big bodies on the field, and more space to run + dual threat QBs being more prominent in this era.

 

 

this.. thank you for being the voice of reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are teams that would kill to have their first round pick produce 31.5 sacks in 4 years and be relatively health and here the huddle group think says "no paying him bad" because he's bad in run defense and in the same breath think a rookie Will Anderson will turn this defense around I swear. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Hall of fame usually means a great player who plays at a high level for a long time. Way too early to crown him anything yet but let's  see how he develops over the next decade.

He should of taken another step already. Can’t go around paying max contracts on hope 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Aussie Tank said:

He should of taken another step already. Can’t go around paying max contracts on hope 

Remember when John Elway was middling at best and then won two Super bowls late in his career. He is in the hall of fame based on those Superbowls late in his career. As for max contracts we don't know what we will pay and may not until the end of 2023. So all this max contracts talk is way premature at this point.

Edited by panthers55
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see you're another football guru who uses one ranking and has that as the pinnacle of all rankings.. Pro Football Network has them top 20 overall. I'm not disputing that we had a middle of the pack OL last year. And I'm not disputing whether Moton has been good or will be good again this year. My reasons to get rid of him now are valid to me.  I would argue we could bring in Membou and that ranking would be no worse then last year. And we would have a young piece for the future that can play both tackle positions. If you would like to discuss your reasons for wanting to keep Moton, then that's fine. But don't act like a child and comment "STFU". That just proves your ignorance! When we have to overpay to keep him next year, or lose him for nothing, I don't wanna hear all the crying! 
    • Thanks Ice and Juan.  I appreciate people who produce and bring content to the table.   Without further ado, my reactions, and I will try to be "laconic" (word of the day): 8- Edge/LB Jalon Walker:  A great football player.  He must be used properly.  Does not eliminate the need for an edge--and we do not draft an edge here. 57- DT T.J. Sanders:  I really liked him at SC--a beast. A DE.  I am not sure how we will rotate in at NT--and I see NT as our biggest DL need IF we play Wharton at DE. 74- WR Jack Bech:  Love this guy.  a Dawg.  Eric Decker II. 111- S Billy Bowman Jr.  Good value here, but I was hoping for a S earlier.  I want one of the top 2 because if both S have position versatility, and we have Walker and DL with position versatility, we'd be hard to play. 114- CB Dorian Strong:  Fine. A depth piece behind Horn and Jackson (he he). However, I think CB is a bigger need than people are projecting. 140- LB Demetrius Knight Jr.:  Another Gamecock--love him.  Morgan will love him.  A dawg.  A steal here. 146- G Caleb Rogers:  Don't we have enough guards?  Moton is in his final year and we don't draft a T? 163- RB Jarquez Hunter:  Not sure I have ever heard of him--probably suing his parents for naming him Jarquez--but the name does mean "Strong and valiant" if spelled correctly.  Do his friends call him Jar Jar?  I would. 230- S Maxen Hook  The great grand son of Peter Pan's nemesis.  He has both hands--for now, but that is because Toledo did not play the Florida Gators.  
×
×
  • Create New...