Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College BBall 2022

jayboogieman

By jayboogieman,
in Charlotte Hornets

 Share

Recommended Posts

CamWhoaaCam Grand Master

CamWhoaaCam

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Carolina’s roster compared to last years is insane.

G - Davis, Trimble

G - Ryan, Dunn, Wilcher

F - Ingram, Wojcik

F - Withers, High

C - Bacot, Washington

If Carolina can land Cleveland then they’ll be in good shape next year. Dunlap would also be a good add from the perspective that he’d be a four year player.

Are any of those guys superstar talents?

 

This program needs to get back to finding those 1 and done talents. Those are the difference makers. Seem like the 1 and done talents aren't even going to college anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Are any of those guys superstar talents?

 

This program needs to get back to finding those 1 and done talents. Those are the difference makers. Seem like the 1 and done talents aren't even going to college anymore.

Ingram could be if he develops a consistent outside shot.

I think the days of super stars running college ball are over, that’s why we had UCONN and SDSU in the finals.

I think college ball is now all about finding 13 guys who can come together as a team and put that NIL garbage aside and just go out there and play to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Carolina’s roster compared to last years is insane.

G - Davis, Trimble

G - Ryan, Dunn, Wilcher

F - Ingram, Wojcik

F - Withers, High

C - Bacot, Washington

If Carolina can land Cleveland then they’ll be in good shape next year. Dunlap would also be a good add from the perspective that he’d be a four year player.

I read Cleveland is down to Mizzou, Auburn and Miami.  I guess we could sneak in there though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, Shocker said:

I read Cleveland is down to Mizzou, Auburn and Miami.  I guess we could sneak in there though.

Bummer, wonder if there’s still an option for Jackson and Cadeau to reclassify. Though that means someone is coming off the bench who probably doesn’t want to.

(Davis, Cadeau, Ryan, Jackson, Ingram, Bacot).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Bummer, wonder if there’s still an option for Jackson and Cadeau to reclassify. Though that means someone is coming off the bench who probably doesn’t want to.

(Davis, Cadeau, Ryan, Jackson, Ingram, Bacot).

I personally haven’t heard about anyone reclassifying but anything is possible.

UNC will probably be thin on depth in the front court but there is some talent there.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
On 5/30/2023 at 12:40 PM, Shocker said:

Cadeau reclassifies!  Nice 

https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/37760000/north-carolina-hoops-recruit-elliot-cadeau-enroll-early?platform=amp

This is huge. He'll be our best true pass first PG since Kendall Marshall. I want to see what Hubert Davis' offense is supposed to look like. All I've seen is a bunch of isolation one on one ball, but he also hasn't had a real PG to work with either.

Bacot has to be tickled to death. Really excited to see what he can do with someone on the roster who can actually throw an entry pass to the post. The guy has been working his ass off because he's had to get most of his himself off of a put backs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...