Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College BBall 2022


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

That should have been a foul and 4 pt play for UNC

Yep. Instead it turns into two for state from ref ego. You know there's gonna be a few of those types of calls with a TV Teddy crew.

Trimble and Nance have regressed big time over the course of the season. Another knock on this coaching staff. I just don't see any player development happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'd love to see what this guy could do on a team with guards that could feed the post and shoot decently enough to keep defenses honest.

If he stays in school for a 5th year and transfers, you might get to see that.

If Bacot was a player 15-20 years ago or more, the NBA would have made him a top 5 pick at least. He actually has some nice post moves.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

If he stays in school for a 5th year and transfers, you might get to see that.

If Bacot was a player 15-20 years ago or more, the NBA would have made him a top 5 pick at least. He actually has some nice post moves.

Yeah, he's just 20 years too late to the game. But I'd be recruiting the poo out of these types. Dominant players that the NBA isn't clamoring for where they can literally make more in NIL money than they can playing pro ball. Yeah, give me all those guys.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...